Study on critical crack length of wet-sieved and full-graded concrete under mode I loading

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1680/jmacr.23.00059
Xingyu Zheng, Zhimin Wu, Mengdi Jia
{"title":"Study on critical crack length of wet-sieved and full-graded concrete under mode I loading","authors":"Xingyu Zheng, Zhimin Wu, Mengdi Jia","doi":"10.1680/jmacr.23.00059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study quantitatively compares the critical crack lengths of wet-sieved and full-graded concrete obtained from experimental measurements, the numerical simulation, with that from the analytical solution based on the linear elastic fracture mechanics formula (LEFM). The experiments are conducted on wedge-splitting specimens with depths from 200 mm to 1500 mm and a maximum aggregate size of 150 mm. Strain gauges and clip gauges are pasted and mounted along the direction of crack growth to measure the critical crack length. The numerical and analytical methods are used to calculate the critical crack length. The average relative error between the analytical calculations and measurements is still 14%, even if the specimen depth increases to 1500 mm. Additionally, the effective fracture toughness is calculated by combining the peak load and critical crack length, resulting in an average relative error of 17%. These results indicate that the existing analytical method is inadequate for determining the critical crack length. Consequently, a modified analytical method is adopted, utilizing the 95% peak load in the post-peak region and the corresponding crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD), which provides calculated results that agree well with experimental data. Furthermore, the effective fracture toughness can be reasonably derived using the critical crack lengths from the modified analytical method.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"53 49","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.23.00059","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study quantitatively compares the critical crack lengths of wet-sieved and full-graded concrete obtained from experimental measurements, the numerical simulation, with that from the analytical solution based on the linear elastic fracture mechanics formula (LEFM). The experiments are conducted on wedge-splitting specimens with depths from 200 mm to 1500 mm and a maximum aggregate size of 150 mm. Strain gauges and clip gauges are pasted and mounted along the direction of crack growth to measure the critical crack length. The numerical and analytical methods are used to calculate the critical crack length. The average relative error between the analytical calculations and measurements is still 14%, even if the specimen depth increases to 1500 mm. Additionally, the effective fracture toughness is calculated by combining the peak load and critical crack length, resulting in an average relative error of 17%. These results indicate that the existing analytical method is inadequate for determining the critical crack length. Consequently, a modified analytical method is adopted, utilizing the 95% peak load in the post-peak region and the corresponding crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD), which provides calculated results that agree well with experimental data. Furthermore, the effective fracture toughness can be reasonably derived using the critical crack lengths from the modified analytical method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模式 I 荷载下湿吸水混凝土和满级配混凝土临界裂缝长度研究
本研究定量比较了通过实验测量、数值模拟和基于线性弹性断裂力学公式(LEFM)的分析求解得到的湿陷性混凝土和满级配混凝土的临界裂缝长度。实验在深度为 200 毫米至 1500 毫米、最大骨料粒径为 150 毫米的楔形劈裂试件上进行。沿裂纹生长方向粘贴和安装应变片和夹片,以测量临界裂纹长度。采用数值和分析方法计算临界裂缝长度。即使试样深度增加到 1500 毫米,分析计算和测量之间的平均相对误差仍为 14%。此外,通过结合峰值载荷和临界裂纹长度计算有效断裂韧性,得出的平均相对误差为 17%。这些结果表明,现有的分析方法不足以确定临界裂纹长度。因此,我们采用了一种改进的分析方法,利用峰值后区域 95% 的峰值载荷和相应的裂缝口张开位移 (CMOD),计算结果与实验数据非常吻合。此外,利用修改后的分析方法得出的临界裂缝长度,可以合理地推导出有效断裂韧性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Engineering Molecular Assembly for High Performance Plastic Thermoelectrics. Mechanistic Design in Photocatalysis. Processable, High-Performance Circularly Polarized Luminescence Architectures for Information Interaction Visible-Light-Mediated aza Paternò–Büchi Reactions and Related Cycloadditions for the Formation of Azetidines and Azetines Thianthrenium Salts in Photochemistry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1