Quantitative imaging of dynamic myocardial blood flow using dual-head rapidly rotating gantry single-photon emission computed tomography to enhance coronary artery disease diagnosis

iRadiology Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1002/ird3.51
Yongli Bai, Bingyue Bai, Gang Miao, Wenzhi Wang, Longmei Wang, Dan Ma, Wenjing Shi
{"title":"Quantitative imaging of dynamic myocardial blood flow using dual-head rapidly rotating gantry single-photon emission computed tomography to enhance coronary artery disease diagnosis","authors":"Yongli Bai,&nbsp;Bingyue Bai,&nbsp;Gang Miao,&nbsp;Wenzhi Wang,&nbsp;Longmei Wang,&nbsp;Dan Ma,&nbsp;Wenjing Shi","doi":"10.1002/ird3.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to evaluate the performance of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD) using dynamic single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) with a dual-head rapidly rotating gantry (RRG) and to compare this method with conventional myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), which can be obtained in a one-stop manner.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 93 patients with suspected or confirmed CAD who underwent RRG SPECT/CT were retrospectively enrolled. They underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and conventional MPI within 3 weeks. Based on the ICA results, the performance of MBF quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters were compared at patient and vessel levels using ≥50% and ≥75% stenosis as the criteria for CAD diagnosis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of two types of parameters.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>For patient-level analysis, the area under ROC curves (AUCs) for stress MBF (sMBF), MFR, summed stress score (SSS), and summed different score (SDS) were 0.971, 0.939, 0.612, and 0.546, respectively, for ≥50% stenosis as positive, and were 0.983, 0.932, 0.735, and 0.509, respectively, for ≥75% stenosis as positive criteria. For vessel-level analysis, the AUCs of sMBF, MFR, SSS, and SDS were 0.981, 0.933, 0.636, and 0.560, respectively, for ≥50% stenosis as positive and were 0.984, 0.933, 0.767, and 0.583, respectively, for ≥75% stenosis as positive criteria.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Compared with semi-quantitative parameters of conventional MPI, MBF quantitative parameters of dual-head RRG SPECT had higher diagnostic performance for CAD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73508,"journal":{"name":"iRadiology","volume":"2 3","pages":"305-317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ird3.51","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iRadiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ird3.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the performance of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD) using dynamic single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) with a dual-head rapidly rotating gantry (RRG) and to compare this method with conventional myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), which can be obtained in a one-stop manner.

Methods

A total of 93 patients with suspected or confirmed CAD who underwent RRG SPECT/CT were retrospectively enrolled. They underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and conventional MPI within 3 weeks. Based on the ICA results, the performance of MBF quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters were compared at patient and vessel levels using ≥50% and ≥75% stenosis as the criteria for CAD diagnosis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of two types of parameters.

Results

For patient-level analysis, the area under ROC curves (AUCs) for stress MBF (sMBF), MFR, summed stress score (SSS), and summed different score (SDS) were 0.971, 0.939, 0.612, and 0.546, respectively, for ≥50% stenosis as positive, and were 0.983, 0.932, 0.735, and 0.509, respectively, for ≥75% stenosis as positive criteria. For vessel-level analysis, the AUCs of sMBF, MFR, SSS, and SDS were 0.981, 0.933, 0.636, and 0.560, respectively, for ≥50% stenosis as positive and were 0.984, 0.933, 0.767, and 0.583, respectively, for ≥75% stenosis as positive criteria.

Conclusions

Compared with semi-quantitative parameters of conventional MPI, MBF quantitative parameters of dual-head RRG SPECT had higher diagnostic performance for CAD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用双头快速旋转龙门单光子发射计算机断层扫描对动态心肌血流进行定量成像,以提高冠状动脉疾病诊断水平
本研究旨在评估使用双头快速旋转龙门(RRG)动态单光子发射计算机断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(SPECT/CT)诊断冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的心肌血流(MBF)和心肌血流储备(MFR)的性能,并将此方法与可一站式获得的传统心肌灌注成像(MPI)进行比较。该研究回顾性地纳入了 93 名疑似或确诊为 CAD 的患者,他们都接受了 RRG SPECT/CT 检查。他们在 3 周内接受了有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)和传统 MPI 检查。根据 ICA 结果,以血管狭窄≥50% 和≥75% 作为诊断 CAD 的标准,比较了 MBF 定量和半定量参数在患者和血管层面的表现。在患者层面的分析中,应激 MBF(sMBF)、MFR、应激总分(SSS)和差异总分(SDS)的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.≥50%狭窄为阳性标准的AUC分别为0.971、0.939、0.612和0.546,≥75%狭窄为阳性标准的AUC分别为0.983、0.932、0.735和0.509。与传统 MPI 的半定量参数相比,双头 RRG SPECT 的 MBF 定量参数对 CAD 的诊断性能更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Artificial intelligence in medical imaging An investigation into the applicability of rapid artificial intelligence-assisted compressed sensing in brain magnetic resonance imaging performed at 5 Tesla field strength Foot pain as first presenting symptom of renal cell carcinoma, due to metastatic lesion in medial cuneiform Key imaging perspectives on Achilles tendon tears—A radiological roadmap: Pictorial essay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1