Are routine autopsy protocols adequate for accurate appraisal of coronary atherosclerosis?

C Velican, D Velican
{"title":"Are routine autopsy protocols adequate for accurate appraisal of coronary atherosclerosis?","authors":"C Velican,&nbsp;D Velican","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atherosclerotic involvement of 1,106 coronary arterial trees was investigated by means of gross inspection, light microscopy, and the method of successive observations of similar topographic sites placed in sequence according to age, sex, cause of death, and anatomic branching pattern. The results obtained, based on strict adherence to routine autopsy protocols, were compared with control studies, which demonstrated that such strict adherence had constrained us to overlook the following aspects: a) existence of particular anatomic branching patterns, such as those of atherogenic character and/or involved in onset of myocardial ischemia; b) development of obstructive plaques in coronary branch vessels; c) presence of obstructive lesions in vessels which supply the conduction system; d) the obstructive character of platelet and fibrin microemboli and thrombi which showered the intramyocardial vessels; e) accurate identification, classification, and grading of atherosclerotic lesions with the aid of routine autopsy protocols, which was not possible in our material.</p>","PeriodicalId":23840,"journal":{"name":"Zentralblatt fur allgemeine Pathologie u. pathologische Anatomie","volume":"135 6","pages":"619-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zentralblatt fur allgemeine Pathologie u. pathologische Anatomie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Atherosclerotic involvement of 1,106 coronary arterial trees was investigated by means of gross inspection, light microscopy, and the method of successive observations of similar topographic sites placed in sequence according to age, sex, cause of death, and anatomic branching pattern. The results obtained, based on strict adherence to routine autopsy protocols, were compared with control studies, which demonstrated that such strict adherence had constrained us to overlook the following aspects: a) existence of particular anatomic branching patterns, such as those of atherogenic character and/or involved in onset of myocardial ischemia; b) development of obstructive plaques in coronary branch vessels; c) presence of obstructive lesions in vessels which supply the conduction system; d) the obstructive character of platelet and fibrin microemboli and thrombi which showered the intramyocardial vessels; e) accurate identification, classification, and grading of atherosclerotic lesions with the aid of routine autopsy protocols, which was not possible in our material.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常规尸检方案是否足以准确评估冠状动脉粥样硬化?
对1106棵冠状动脉树的动脉粥样硬化累及情况进行了研究,方法包括肉眼检查、光学显微镜以及根据年龄、性别、死亡原因和解剖分支模式依次排列的相似地形位置的连续观察方法。在严格遵守常规尸检方案的基础上获得的结果与对照研究进行了比较,结果表明,这种严格的遵守限制了我们忽视以下方面:a)存在特定的解剖分支模式,例如动脉粥样硬化特征和/或与心肌缺血发作有关的分支模式;B)冠状动脉分支血管梗阻性斑块的形成;C)在供应传导系统的血管中存在阻塞性病变;D)血小板、纤维蛋白微栓子和血栓阻塞心内血管;E)在常规尸检方案的帮助下准确识别、分类和分级动脉粥样硬化病变,这在我们的研究中是不可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Gomori reactions in orthology and pathology]. Routine immunohistochemical characterization of short term in vitro explants from human intracranial tumours. Histological and immunocytochemical findings in a case of fetal choroid plexus papilloma. [Fibrolamellar variant of hepatocellular carcinoma]. [Electron microscopy for bioptic bone marrow diagnosis].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1