Priority change and driving factors in the voluntary carbon offset market

IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Cleaner Environmental Systems Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100164
Hidemichi Fujii , Jeremy Webb , Sagadevan Mundree , David Rowlings , Peter Grace , Clevo Wilson , Shunsuke Managi
{"title":"Priority change and driving factors in the voluntary carbon offset market","authors":"Hidemichi Fujii ,&nbsp;Jeremy Webb ,&nbsp;Sagadevan Mundree ,&nbsp;David Rowlings ,&nbsp;Peter Grace ,&nbsp;Clevo Wilson ,&nbsp;Shunsuke Managi","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Voluntary carbon offset markets play an important role in climate change mitigation by deploying technologies in order of lowest abatement cost. The objective of this study is to identify the key drivers of changes in the volume of carbon credits issued in voluntary registry offset markets from 2006 to 2020 using a decomposition analysis framework. The results show that the volume of issued carbon credits related to forestry and land use increased from 2006 to 2015 due to priority increases and scale expansions in REDD+ projects. In addition, the reasons for the priority changes in carbon credits issued varied according to the scale of carbon offset programs in each region. The comparison of scale effect and carbon offset program priority is a useful tool for understanding changes in carbon credits issued according to project technology and region. The very rapid increase in forestry carbon credits issued does however pose important policy implications given it has been accompanied by widespread indications of poor governance and questionable outcomes in terms of CO<sub>2</sub> reduction. In light of the IPCC's reliance on carbon credits the need for thoroughgoing policy reform is underlined.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100164"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000023/pdfft?md5=15f05529676410cca6e8a2a0c56d4889&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000023-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Voluntary carbon offset markets play an important role in climate change mitigation by deploying technologies in order of lowest abatement cost. The objective of this study is to identify the key drivers of changes in the volume of carbon credits issued in voluntary registry offset markets from 2006 to 2020 using a decomposition analysis framework. The results show that the volume of issued carbon credits related to forestry and land use increased from 2006 to 2015 due to priority increases and scale expansions in REDD+ projects. In addition, the reasons for the priority changes in carbon credits issued varied according to the scale of carbon offset programs in each region. The comparison of scale effect and carbon offset program priority is a useful tool for understanding changes in carbon credits issued according to project technology and region. The very rapid increase in forestry carbon credits issued does however pose important policy implications given it has been accompanied by widespread indications of poor governance and questionable outcomes in terms of CO2 reduction. In light of the IPCC's reliance on carbon credits the need for thoroughgoing policy reform is underlined.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自愿碳补偿市场的优先事项变化和驱动因素
自愿碳抵消市场按照减排成本最低的顺序部署技术,在减缓气候变化方面发挥着重要作用。本研究的目的是利用分解分析框架,确定 2006 年至 2020 年自愿登记碳补偿市场碳信用额发放量变化的主要驱动因素。研究结果表明,由于 REDD+ 项目优先级的提高和规模的扩大,2006 年至 2015 年与林业和土地利用相关的碳信用额发放量有所增加。此外,各地区碳抵消项目的规模不同,导致碳信用额优先级变化的原因也不同。规模效应与碳补偿项目优先权的比较是了解项目技术和地区碳信用额发放变化的有用工具。然而,林业碳信用额的快速增长确实带来了重要的政策影响,因为与之相伴的是管理不善和在二氧化碳减排方面的结果令人质疑的普遍迹象。鉴于 IPCC 对碳信用额度的依赖,强调了进行彻底政策改革的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Cleaner Environmental Systems Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Gate-to-gate life cycle assessment of lithium-ion battery recycling pre-treatment Assessing greenhouse gas emissions in hospitals: The development of an open-access calculator and its application to a German case-study Life cycle assessment and material flow analysis of road and rail infrastructure assets – A critical review A review of best international life cycle assessment (LCA) practices in wood construction: Challenges for Ireland Life cycle assessment of aquaculture production in Greece
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1