Impact of Lowered Inpatient Correctional Bedtime Insulin Dosing on Glycemic Outcomes of Veterans.

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of pharmacy practice Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-23 DOI:10.1177/08971900241228776
Allacyn Hiscox, Jennifer Armbrust, Maria Shin, Jeffrey Bahng
{"title":"Impact of Lowered Inpatient Correctional Bedtime Insulin Dosing on Glycemic Outcomes of Veterans.","authors":"Allacyn Hiscox, Jennifer Armbrust, Maria Shin, Jeffrey Bahng","doi":"10.1177/08971900241228776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> This study evaluated glycemic outcomes for hospitalized patients after reduction in bedtime correctional insulin dosing. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective, single-center analysis of a protocol change that reduced bedtime correctional insulin scale. Comparable cohorts pre- and post-protocol change were created which included patients who were ordered correctional insulin with at least 1 blood glucose (BG) reading. The primary outcome was number of nocturnal hypoglycemia readings. Secondary outcomes included, but were not limited to, mean fasting BG, BG within various ranges, and length of stay. <b>Results:</b> 3 percent of patients in the post-protocol change group (N = 100) experienced nocturnal hypoglycemia compared to 6% of patients in the pre-change group (N = 100) (<i>P</i> = .507). There were no significant differences in BG ranges <110 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, 140 to 180 mg/dL, and >180 mg/dL. However, 19% of patients in the post-protocol change group had BG of >250 mg/dL as compared to 9% in the pre-change group (<i>P</i> = .033). Mean fasting BG was higher in the post-protocol change group compared to the pre-change group (156.5 mg/dL vs 139.3 mg/dL [<i>P</i> = .002]), as was hospital length of stay (5.17 vs 4.6 days, [<i>P</i> = .024]). <b>Conclusions:</b> A decreased bedtime correctional insulin scale had mixed results with more patients achieving goal fasting BG but also more patients experiencing BG > 250 mg/dL and longer length of stay. Larger prospective studies are required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this type of intervention and its long-term impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"1141-1148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900241228776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated glycemic outcomes for hospitalized patients after reduction in bedtime correctional insulin dosing. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center analysis of a protocol change that reduced bedtime correctional insulin scale. Comparable cohorts pre- and post-protocol change were created which included patients who were ordered correctional insulin with at least 1 blood glucose (BG) reading. The primary outcome was number of nocturnal hypoglycemia readings. Secondary outcomes included, but were not limited to, mean fasting BG, BG within various ranges, and length of stay. Results: 3 percent of patients in the post-protocol change group (N = 100) experienced nocturnal hypoglycemia compared to 6% of patients in the pre-change group (N = 100) (P = .507). There were no significant differences in BG ranges <110 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, 140 to 180 mg/dL, and >180 mg/dL. However, 19% of patients in the post-protocol change group had BG of >250 mg/dL as compared to 9% in the pre-change group (P = .033). Mean fasting BG was higher in the post-protocol change group compared to the pre-change group (156.5 mg/dL vs 139.3 mg/dL [P = .002]), as was hospital length of stay (5.17 vs 4.6 days, [P = .024]). Conclusions: A decreased bedtime correctional insulin scale had mixed results with more patients achieving goal fasting BG but also more patients experiencing BG > 250 mg/dL and longer length of stay. Larger prospective studies are required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this type of intervention and its long-term impact.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
降低住院教养床边胰岛素剂量对退伍军人血糖结果的影响。
目的:本研究评估了住院患者减少睡前胰岛素剂量后的血糖结果。方法这是对减少睡前胰岛素剂量的方案变更进行的一项回顾性单中心分析。建立了方案变更前后的可比队列,其中包括至少有一次血糖 (BG) 读数的接受胰岛素治疗的患者。主要结果是夜间低血糖读数的次数。次要结果包括但不限于平均空腹血糖、各种范围内的血糖以及住院时间。研究结果改变方案后组(N = 100)有 3% 的患者出现夜间低血糖,而改变方案前组(N = 100)有 6% 的患者出现夜间低血糖(P = .507)。血糖范围 180 mg/dL 无明显差异。然而,在方案改变后组,19% 的患者血糖>250 毫克/分升,而在方案改变前组,只有 9% 的患者血糖>250 毫克/分升(P = .033)。改变方案后组的平均空腹血糖高于改变方案前组(156.5 mg/dL vs 139.3 mg/dL [P = .002]),住院时间也高于改变方案前组(5.17 天 vs 4.6 天,[P = .024])。结论减少睡前胰岛素修正量表的结果好坏参半,更多患者达到了空腹血糖目标,但也有更多患者血糖> 250 mg/dL,住院时间更长。需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究,以评估此类干预措施的安全性和有效性及其长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
期刊最新文献
Pharmacist Integration to Support Continuous Glucose Monitoring Initiation: A Collaborative, Patient-Centered Approach. Priapism Associated With the Rapid Titration of Prazosin: A Case Report. Thrombosis Secondary to Intravenous Dicyclomine Administration: A Case Report and Literature Review. Implementation of AUC-Guided Vancomycin Dosing: What Role Remains for Trough-Only Monitoring? A Retrospective, Cohort Study. Association Between Erythromycin or Clindamycin Resistance and 30-Day Mortality in Patients With MSSA Bacteremia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1