Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for irritability in autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis with the GRADE assessment.

IF 6.3 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY Molecular Autism Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI:10.1186/s13229-024-00585-6
Hangnyoung Choi, Jae Han Kim, Hee Sang Yang, Jong Yeob Kim, Samuele Cortese, Lee Smith, Ai Koyanagi, Elena Dragioti, Joaquim Radua, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Jae Il Shin, Keun-Ah Cheon, Marco Solmi
{"title":"Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for irritability in autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis with the GRADE assessment.","authors":"Hangnyoung Choi, Jae Han Kim, Hee Sang Yang, Jong Yeob Kim, Samuele Cortese, Lee Smith, Ai Koyanagi, Elena Dragioti, Joaquim Radua, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Jae Il Shin, Keun-Ah Cheon, Marco Solmi","doi":"10.1186/s13229-024-00585-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous interventions for irritability in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have been investigated. We aimed to appraise the magnitude of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for irritability in ASD without any restrictions in terms of eligible interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science until April 15, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a parallel design that examined the efficacy of interventions for the treatment of irritability in patients of any age with ASD without any restrictions in terms of eligible interventions. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis by pooling effect sizes as Hedges' g. We classified assessed interventions as follows: pharmacological monotherapy, risperidone plus adjuvant therapy versus risperidone monotherapy, non-pharmacological intervention, and dietary intervention. We utilized the Cochrane tool to evaluate the risk of bias in each study and the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence for each meta-analyzed intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 5640 references, we identified 60 eligible articles with 45 different kinds of interventions, including 3531 participants, of which 80.9% were males (mean age [SD] = 8.79 [3.85]). For pharmacological monotherapy, risperidone (Hedges' g - 0.857, 95% CI - 1.263 to - 0.451, certainty of evidence: high) and aripiprazole (Hedges' g - 0.559, 95% CI - 0.767 to - 0.351, certainty of evidence: high) outperformed placebo. Among the non-pharmacological interventions, parent training (Hedges' g - 0.893, 95% CI - 1.184 to - 0.602, certainty of evidence: moderate) showed a significant result. None of the meta-analyzed interventions yielded significant effects among risperidone + adjuvant therapy and dietary supplementation. However, several novel molecules in augmentation to risperidone outperformed risperidone monotherapy, yet from one RCT each.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>First, various tools have been utilized to measure the irritability in ASD, which may contribute to the heterogeneity of the outcomes. Second, meta-analyses for each intervention included only a small number of studies and participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Only risperidone, aripiprazole among pharmacological interventions, and parent training among non-pharmacological interventions can be recommended for irritability in ASD. As an augmentation to risperidone, several novel treatments show promising effects, but further RCTs are needed to replicate findings. Trial registration PROSPERO, CRD42021243965.</p>","PeriodicalId":18733,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Autism","volume":"15 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10807060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Autism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-024-00585-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Numerous interventions for irritability in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have been investigated. We aimed to appraise the magnitude of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for irritability in ASD without any restrictions in terms of eligible interventions.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science until April 15, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a parallel design that examined the efficacy of interventions for the treatment of irritability in patients of any age with ASD without any restrictions in terms of eligible interventions. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis by pooling effect sizes as Hedges' g. We classified assessed interventions as follows: pharmacological monotherapy, risperidone plus adjuvant therapy versus risperidone monotherapy, non-pharmacological intervention, and dietary intervention. We utilized the Cochrane tool to evaluate the risk of bias in each study and the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence for each meta-analyzed intervention.

Results: Out of 5640 references, we identified 60 eligible articles with 45 different kinds of interventions, including 3531 participants, of which 80.9% were males (mean age [SD] = 8.79 [3.85]). For pharmacological monotherapy, risperidone (Hedges' g - 0.857, 95% CI - 1.263 to - 0.451, certainty of evidence: high) and aripiprazole (Hedges' g - 0.559, 95% CI - 0.767 to - 0.351, certainty of evidence: high) outperformed placebo. Among the non-pharmacological interventions, parent training (Hedges' g - 0.893, 95% CI - 1.184 to - 0.602, certainty of evidence: moderate) showed a significant result. None of the meta-analyzed interventions yielded significant effects among risperidone + adjuvant therapy and dietary supplementation. However, several novel molecules in augmentation to risperidone outperformed risperidone monotherapy, yet from one RCT each.

Limitations: First, various tools have been utilized to measure the irritability in ASD, which may contribute to the heterogeneity of the outcomes. Second, meta-analyses for each intervention included only a small number of studies and participants.

Conclusions: Only risperidone, aripiprazole among pharmacological interventions, and parent training among non-pharmacological interventions can be recommended for irritability in ASD. As an augmentation to risperidone, several novel treatments show promising effects, but further RCTs are needed to replicate findings. Trial registration PROSPERO, CRD42021243965.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对自闭症谱系障碍易激惹性的药物和非药物干预:采用 GRADE 评估方法进行的系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:针对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)易激惹性的许多干预措施已得到研究。我们的目的是评估针对自闭症谱系障碍易激惹性的药物和非药物干预措施的效果,对符合条件的干预措施不作任何限制:我们系统地检索了 PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus 和 Web of Science,直至 2023 年 4 月 15 日。我们纳入了采用平行设计的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验研究了治疗任何年龄段 ASD 患者易激惹性的干预措施的疗效,对符合条件的干预措施没有任何限制。我们将评估的干预措施分为以下几类:药物单一疗法、利培酮加辅助疗法与利培酮单一疗法、非药物干预和饮食干预。我们使用 Cochrane 工具评估了每项研究的偏倚风险,并使用 GRADE 方法评估了每项荟萃分析干预措施的证据确定性:在 5640 篇参考文献中,我们发现了 60 篇符合条件的文章,涉及 45 种不同的干预措施,包括 3531 名参与者,其中 80.9% 为男性(平均年龄 [SD] = 8.79 [3.85])。在单一药物疗法中,利培酮(Hedges' g - 0.857,95% CI - 1.263 to - 0.451,证据确定性:高)和阿立哌唑(Hedges' g - 0.559,95% CI - 0.767 to - 0.351,证据确定性:高)的疗效优于安慰剂。在非药物干预中,家长培训(Hedges' g - 0.893,95% CI - 1.184 to - 0.602,证据确定性:中)的效果显著。在利培酮+辅助疗法和膳食补充剂中,没有一项荟萃分析干预措施产生了显著效果。然而,在利培酮的辅助治疗中,几种新型分子药物的疗效优于利培酮单药治疗,但每种药物均来自一项研究:局限性:首先,测量ASD易激惹性的工具多种多样,这可能会导致结果的异质性。其次,每种干预措施的荟萃分析仅包括少量研究和参与者:结论:药物干预中只有利培酮、阿立哌唑和非药物干预中的家长培训可用于治疗ASD的易激惹性。作为利培酮的辅助治疗,几种新型疗法显示出了良好的效果,但还需要进一步的RCT研究来验证研究结果。试验注册PROSPERO,CRD42021243965。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Autism
Molecular Autism GENETICS & HEREDITY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
44
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Autism is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes high-quality basic, translational and clinical research that has relevance to the etiology, pathobiology, or treatment of autism and related neurodevelopmental conditions. Research that includes integration across levels is encouraged. Molecular Autism publishes empirical studies, reviews, and brief communications.
期刊最新文献
Understanding cognitive flexibility in emotional evaluation in autistic males and females: the social context matters. Investigating frank autism: clinician initial impressions and autism characteristics. Auditory N1 event-related potential amplitude is predictive of serum concentration of BPN14770 in fragile X syndrome. Characterizing genetic pathways unique to autism spectrum disorder at multiple levels of biological analysis. Developmental trajectories in infants and pre-school children with Neurofibromatosis 1.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1