The intersectional social patterning of early-COVID-era digital intimacies among transgender and gender-diverse young adults: effects on peri-pandemic sexual decision-making.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES Culture, Health & Sexuality Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-24 DOI:10.1080/13691058.2024.2302054
Simone J Skeen, Demetria Cain, Kripa Mehta, Joshua A Rusow, Keith J Horvath, Cathy J Reback
{"title":"The intersectional social patterning of early-COVID-era digital intimacies among transgender and gender-diverse young adults: effects on peri-pandemic sexual decision-making.","authors":"Simone J Skeen, Demetria Cain, Kripa Mehta, Joshua A Rusow, Keith J Horvath, Cathy J Reback","doi":"10.1080/13691058.2024.2302054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interactive communications technologies facilitate identity formation and socio-sexual connection among transgender and gender-diverse young people. However, within their communities, variations in technology use along ethno-racial, sexual and gendered lines, and as facilitators of sexual resilience during the early COVID-19 pandemic, remain under-studied. Among <i>N</i> = 230 transgender and gender-diverse young adults, surveyed between October 2020 and September 2021, latent class analyses characterised participants by preferred functional affordances, such as finding dates, sex and friends (Model 1), and by simultaneous account-keeping across social, dating and 'hookup' apps (Model 2). Werron and Ringel's typology of pandemic practices characterised qualitative descriptions of sexual decision-making attributed to COVID-19. Both fit indices favoured two-class solutions. Model 1 detected an <i>n</i> = 89, 43% 'high interactive communications technologies-enabled intimacy' (versus 'low technology-enabled intimacy') class, in which digitally mediated friendships, dates, sexual encounters and gay/lesbian sexualities, predominated. An <i>n</i> = 38, 17% 'high socio-sexual polymedia' (versus 'low polymedia') class in Model 2 was characterised by simultaneous social media, 'hookup' and dating app usage. 'High' subgroups saw statistically significant reductions in sexual partners, with the high polymedia class also associated with reductions in HIV testing. Qualitative results contextualised these reductions as, predominantly, 'responsive' pandemic practices: reactions to stay-at-home orders.</p>","PeriodicalId":10799,"journal":{"name":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2024.2302054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interactive communications technologies facilitate identity formation and socio-sexual connection among transgender and gender-diverse young people. However, within their communities, variations in technology use along ethno-racial, sexual and gendered lines, and as facilitators of sexual resilience during the early COVID-19 pandemic, remain under-studied. Among N = 230 transgender and gender-diverse young adults, surveyed between October 2020 and September 2021, latent class analyses characterised participants by preferred functional affordances, such as finding dates, sex and friends (Model 1), and by simultaneous account-keeping across social, dating and 'hookup' apps (Model 2). Werron and Ringel's typology of pandemic practices characterised qualitative descriptions of sexual decision-making attributed to COVID-19. Both fit indices favoured two-class solutions. Model 1 detected an n = 89, 43% 'high interactive communications technologies-enabled intimacy' (versus 'low technology-enabled intimacy') class, in which digitally mediated friendships, dates, sexual encounters and gay/lesbian sexualities, predominated. An n = 38, 17% 'high socio-sexual polymedia' (versus 'low polymedia') class in Model 2 was characterised by simultaneous social media, 'hookup' and dating app usage. 'High' subgroups saw statistically significant reductions in sexual partners, with the high polymedia class also associated with reductions in HIV testing. Qualitative results contextualised these reductions as, predominantly, 'responsive' pandemic practices: reactions to stay-at-home orders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
变性和性别多元化年轻人早期 COVID 时代数字亲密关系的交叉社会模式:对流行期性决策的影响。
互动通信技术促进了变性和性别多元化年轻人的身份形成和社会性联系。然而,在他们的社区中,技术使用在种族、性和性别方面的差异,以及在 COVID-19 大流行早期作为性复原力的促进因素,仍未得到充分研究。在 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 9 月期间接受调查的 N = 230 名变性和性别多样化的年轻人中,潜类分析根据参与者偏好的功能性负担(如寻找约会、性和朋友)(模型 1)以及同时在社交、约会和 "勾搭 "应用程序中保留账户(模型 2)对其进行了特征描述。Werron和Ringel的流行实践类型学描述了COVID-19对性决策的定性描述。两个拟合指数都倾向于两类解决方案。模型 1 发现了一个 n = 89、43% 的 "高互动通信技术促成的亲密关系"(相对于 "低技术促成的亲密关系")类别,其中以数字为媒介的友谊、约会、性接触和男同性恋/女同性恋性行为占主导地位。模型 2 中有一个 n = 38、17% 的 "高社会性多媒体"(相对于 "低多媒体")群体,其特点是同时使用社交媒体、"勾搭 "和约会应用程序。据统计,"高 "亚组的性伴侣数量显著减少,高多媒介组的 HIV 检测数量也有所减少。定性结果表明,这些减少主要是 "响应 "流行病的做法:对家庭订单的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
80
期刊最新文献
Cultural taboos and low sexual and reproductive health literacy among university students in Magway city, Myanmar. (In)visibilising pregnancy loss in Southern Malawi. Girls' experiences of cellphone porn use in South Africa and their accounts of sexual risk in the classroom. Healthcare professionals' attitudes towards the termination of pregnancy: a qualitative analysis of survey data in Northern Ireland. Views and experiences of young women from a migrant or refugee background regarding the contraceptive implant in Australia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1