Exploring health equity in Lesotho's Child Grants Programme.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health policy and planning Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI:10.1093/heapol/czad116
Elodie Besnier, Virginia Kotzias, Thandie Hlabana, Kathryn Beck, Céline Sieu, Kimanzi Muthengi
{"title":"Exploring health equity in Lesotho's Child Grants Programme.","authors":"Elodie Besnier, Virginia Kotzias, Thandie Hlabana, Kathryn Beck, Céline Sieu, Kimanzi Muthengi","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czad116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite their growing popularity, little is known about how cash transfers (CTs) can affect health equity in targeted communities. Lesotho's Child Grants Programme (CGP) is an unconditional CT targeting poor and vulnerable households with children. Started in 2009, the CGP is one of Lesotho's key programmes in developing the country's social protection system. Using the CGP's early phases as a case study, this research aims to capture how programme stakeholders understood and operationalized the concept of health equity in Lesotho's CGP. The qualitative analysis relied on the triangulation of findings from a desk review and semi-structured key informant interviews with programme stakeholders. The programme documents were coded deductively and the interview transcripts inductively. Both materials were analysed thematically before triangulating their findings. We explored determining factors for differences or disagreements within a theme according to the programme's chronology, the stakeholders' affiliations and their role(s) in the CGP. The definitions of health equity in the context of the CGP reflected an awareness among stakeholders of these issues and their determinants but also the challenges raised by the complex (or even debated) nature of the concept. The most common definition of this concept focused on children's access to health services for the most disadvantaged households, suggesting a narrow, targeted approach to health equity as targeting disadvantages. Yet, even the most common definition of this concept was not fully translated into the programme, especially in the day-to-day operations and reporting at the local level. This operationalization gap affected the study of selected health spillover effects of the CGP on health equity and might have undermined other programme impacts related to specific health disadvantages or gaps. As equity objectives become more prominent in CTs, understanding their meaning and translation into concrete, observable and measurable applications in programmes are essential to support impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10883666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czad116","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite their growing popularity, little is known about how cash transfers (CTs) can affect health equity in targeted communities. Lesotho's Child Grants Programme (CGP) is an unconditional CT targeting poor and vulnerable households with children. Started in 2009, the CGP is one of Lesotho's key programmes in developing the country's social protection system. Using the CGP's early phases as a case study, this research aims to capture how programme stakeholders understood and operationalized the concept of health equity in Lesotho's CGP. The qualitative analysis relied on the triangulation of findings from a desk review and semi-structured key informant interviews with programme stakeholders. The programme documents were coded deductively and the interview transcripts inductively. Both materials were analysed thematically before triangulating their findings. We explored determining factors for differences or disagreements within a theme according to the programme's chronology, the stakeholders' affiliations and their role(s) in the CGP. The definitions of health equity in the context of the CGP reflected an awareness among stakeholders of these issues and their determinants but also the challenges raised by the complex (or even debated) nature of the concept. The most common definition of this concept focused on children's access to health services for the most disadvantaged households, suggesting a narrow, targeted approach to health equity as targeting disadvantages. Yet, even the most common definition of this concept was not fully translated into the programme, especially in the day-to-day operations and reporting at the local level. This operationalization gap affected the study of selected health spillover effects of the CGP on health equity and might have undermined other programme impacts related to specific health disadvantages or gaps. As equity objectives become more prominent in CTs, understanding their meaning and translation into concrete, observable and measurable applications in programmes are essential to support impact.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索莱索托儿童补助金计划中的卫生公平问题。
尽管现金转移(CT)越来越受欢迎,但人们对其如何影响目标社区的健康公平却知之甚少。莱索托的 "儿童补助金计划"(CGP)是一项无条件的现金转移计划,目标群体是有孩子的贫困和弱势家庭。儿童补助金计划始于 2009 年,是莱索托发展社会保护体系的关键计划之一。本研究以 "儿童发展社区项目 "的早期阶段为案例,旨在了解项目利益相关者是如何理解和实施莱索托 "儿童发展社区项目 "中的健康公平概念的。定性分析依赖于对案头审查结果和与计划利益相关者进行的半结构化关键信息提供者访谈结果的三角分析。对计划文件进行了演绎编码,对访谈记录进行了归纳编码。在对调查结果进行三角分析之前,先对这两份材料进行了专题分析。我们根据计划的时间顺序、利益相关者的隶属关系以及他们在 CGP 中的角色,探讨了在一个主题中产生分歧或分歧的决定性因素。CGP 中对健康公平的定义反映了利益相关者对这些问题及其决定因素的认识,但也反映了这一概念的复杂性(甚至是争论性)所带来的挑战。对这一概念最常见的定义侧重于处境最不利家庭的儿童获得保健服务的机会,这表明对保健公平采取了一种狭隘的、有针对性的方法,即针对不利条件。然而,即使是这一概念最常见的定义也没有完全落实到计划中,特别是在地方一级的日常运作和报告中。这种操作上的差距影响了对 CGP 对健康公平的特定健康溢出效应的研究,并可能削弱与特定健康劣势或差距有关的其他计划影响。随着公平目标在 "共同国家评估 "中变得更加突出,理解其含义并将其转化为具体、可观察和可衡量的计划应用,对于支持计划影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health policy and planning
Health policy and planning 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries. Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.
期刊最新文献
Validity of a visual analogue scale to measure and value the perceived level of sanitation - evidence from Ghana and Mozambique. Care seeking during pregnancy: testing the assumptions behind Service Delivery Reform for Maternal and Newborn Health in rural Kenya. Organizational resilience and primary care nurses' work conditions and wellbeing: a multilevel empirical study in China. Examining sustained sub-national health system development: experience from the Western Cape province, South Africa, 1994-2016. Beliefs of Pentecostal pastors concerning the use of antiretroviral treatment among Pentecostal Christians living with HIV in a suburb of Cape Town-South Africa: a community health systems lens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1