The Clinician's Tardive Inventory (CTI): A New Clinical Tool for Documenting and Rating Tardive Dyskinesia.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Clinical Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-01-24 DOI:10.4088/JCP.23m14886
Richard M Trosch, Cynthia L Comella, Stanley N Caroff, William G Ondo, Alicia C Shillington, Brandon J LaChappelle, Robert A Hauser, Christoph U Correll, Joseph H Friedman
{"title":"The Clinician's Tardive Inventory (CTI): A New Clinical Tool for Documenting and Rating Tardive Dyskinesia.","authors":"Richard M Trosch, Cynthia L Comella, Stanley N Caroff, William G Ondo, Alicia C Shillington, Brandon J LaChappelle, Robert A Hauser, Christoph U Correll, Joseph H Friedman","doi":"10.4088/JCP.23m14886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Current clinician-rated tardive dyskinesia (TD) symptom scales have not addressed the expanding clinical signs and functional impact of TD. The study objective was to develop and test the reliability of a new integrated instrument.</p><p><p><b><i>Methods:</i></b> A movement disorder neurologist devised the outline of the rating scale. A Steering Committee (5 neurologists and 2 psychiatrists) provided revisions until consensus was reached. The Clinician's Tardive Inventory (CTI) assesses abnormal movements of the eye/eyelid/face, tongue/mouth, jaw, and limb/trunk; complex movements defined as complicated movements different from simple patterned movements or postures; and vocalizations. The CTI rates frequency of symptoms from 0 to 3 (ranging from absent to constant). Functional impairments, including activities of daily living (ADL), social impairment, symptom distress, and physical harm, are rated 0-3 (ranging from unawareness to severe impact). The CTI underwent interrater and test-retest reliability testing between February and June 2022 based on videos and accompanying vignettes, which were reviewed by 2 movement disorder specialists to determine adequacy. Four clinicians rated each video/vignette. Interrater agreement was analyzed via 2-way random-effects intraclass correlation (ICC), and test-retest agreement was assessed utilizing the Kendall tau-b.</p><p><p><b><i>Results:</i></b> Forty-five video/vignettes were assessed for interrater reliability and 16 for test-retest reliability. The most prevalent movements were those of the tongue and mouth (77.8%) and jaw (55.6%). ICCs for movement frequency for anatomic symptoms were as follows: anatomic symptom summary score 0.92, abnormal eye movement 0.89, abnormal tongue/mouth movement 0.91, abnormal jaw movement 0.89, abnormal limb movement 0.76, complex movement 0.87, and abnormal vocalization 0.77; ICCs for functional impairments were as follows: total impairment score 0.92, physical harm 0.82, social embarrassment 0.88, ADLs 0.83, and symptom bother 0.92; Retests were conducted a mean (SD) of 15 (3) days later with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.66 to 0.87.</p><p><p><b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The CTI is a new integrated instrument with proven reliability in assessing TD signs and functional impacts. Future validation study is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23m14886","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Current clinician-rated tardive dyskinesia (TD) symptom scales have not addressed the expanding clinical signs and functional impact of TD. The study objective was to develop and test the reliability of a new integrated instrument.

Methods: A movement disorder neurologist devised the outline of the rating scale. A Steering Committee (5 neurologists and 2 psychiatrists) provided revisions until consensus was reached. The Clinician's Tardive Inventory (CTI) assesses abnormal movements of the eye/eyelid/face, tongue/mouth, jaw, and limb/trunk; complex movements defined as complicated movements different from simple patterned movements or postures; and vocalizations. The CTI rates frequency of symptoms from 0 to 3 (ranging from absent to constant). Functional impairments, including activities of daily living (ADL), social impairment, symptom distress, and physical harm, are rated 0-3 (ranging from unawareness to severe impact). The CTI underwent interrater and test-retest reliability testing between February and June 2022 based on videos and accompanying vignettes, which were reviewed by 2 movement disorder specialists to determine adequacy. Four clinicians rated each video/vignette. Interrater agreement was analyzed via 2-way random-effects intraclass correlation (ICC), and test-retest agreement was assessed utilizing the Kendall tau-b.

Results: Forty-five video/vignettes were assessed for interrater reliability and 16 for test-retest reliability. The most prevalent movements were those of the tongue and mouth (77.8%) and jaw (55.6%). ICCs for movement frequency for anatomic symptoms were as follows: anatomic symptom summary score 0.92, abnormal eye movement 0.89, abnormal tongue/mouth movement 0.91, abnormal jaw movement 0.89, abnormal limb movement 0.76, complex movement 0.87, and abnormal vocalization 0.77; ICCs for functional impairments were as follows: total impairment score 0.92, physical harm 0.82, social embarrassment 0.88, ADLs 0.83, and symptom bother 0.92; Retests were conducted a mean (SD) of 15 (3) days later with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.66 to 0.87.

Conclusions: The CTI is a new integrated instrument with proven reliability in assessing TD signs and functional impacts. Future validation study is warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床医师迟发性运动障碍量表(CTI):记录和评定迟发性运动障碍的新临床工具。
目的:目前由临床医生评定的迟发性运动障碍(TD)症状量表并未涉及TD不断扩大的临床症状和对功能的影响。本研究旨在开发一种新的综合工具并测试其可靠性:方法:一位运动障碍神经学家设计了评分量表的大纲。指导委员会(5 名神经科医生和 2 名精神科医生)对其进行了修订,直至达成共识。临床医师迟缓量表(CTI)评估眼/睑/面、舌/口、下颌和肢体/躯干的异常运动;复杂运动,即不同于简单模式化运动或姿势的复杂运动;以及发声。CTI 将症状频率分为 0 至 3 级(从无到持续)。功能障碍包括日常生活活动 (ADL)、社交障碍、症状困扰和身体伤害,评分为 0 到 3(从不知情到严重影响)。2022 年 2 月至 6 月期间,CTI 根据视频和随附的小故事进行了互测和重测可靠性测试,并由两名运动障碍专家对视频和小故事进行了审查,以确定其适当性。四名临床医生对每段视频/小故事进行评分。通过双向随机效应类内相关性(ICC)分析相互之间的一致性,并利用 Kendall tau-b 评估测试-复测一致性:对 45 个视频/小节进行了研究者间可靠性评估,对 16 个视频/小节进行了测试-重测可靠性评估。最常见的动作是舌头和口腔(77.8%)以及下颌(55.6%)的动作。解剖症状运动频率的 ICC 值如下:解剖症状总分 0.92、眼部异常运动 0.89、舌/口部异常运动 0.91、下颌异常运动 0.89、肢体异常运动 0.76、复杂运动 0.87 和发声异常 0.77;功能障碍的 ICCs 如下:功能障碍总分 0.92、身体伤害 0.82、社交尴尬 0.88、ADLs 0.83 和症状困扰 0.92;平均(标清)15(3)天后进行重测,相关系数在 0.66 至 0.87 之间:CTI 是一种新的综合工具,在评估 TD 征兆和功能影响方面具有公认的可靠性。未来的验证研究值得进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 75 years, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry has been a leading source of peer-reviewed articles offering the latest information on mental health topics to psychiatrists and other medical professionals.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the leading psychiatric resource for clinical information and covers disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, addiction, posttraumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder while exploring the newest advances in diagnosis and treatment.
期刊最新文献
Rates of Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder in Black and White Postpartum Women. Towards a Further Understanding of Meta-Analysis Using Gestational Exposure to Cannabis and Birth Defects as a Case in Point. Clarification Regarding the Psychiatrist's Role: Psychiatric Care Versus Psychosocial Support-Reply to Akerson et al. Mental Health Assessment and Psychosocial Intervention Are Already Happening for Maternal-Fetal Interventions. Substance Use Disorder Treatment Programs for Transgender and Gender Diverse Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1