Needling and Lavage in Rotator Cuff Calcific Tendinitis: Ultrasound-Guided Technique.

IF 1 Q3 SURGERY JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques Pub Date : 2024-01-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00029
Fenneken Laura Ten Hove, Pieter Bas de Witte, Monique Reijnierse, Ana Navas
{"title":"Needling and Lavage in Rotator Cuff Calcific Tendinitis: Ultrasound-Guided Technique.","authors":"Fenneken Laura Ten Hove, Pieter Bas de Witte, Monique Reijnierse, Ana Navas","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rotator cuff calcific tendinitis (RCCT) is a commonly occurring disease, with a prevalence of up to 42.5% in patients with shoulder pain<sup>1,2</sup>. RCCT is characterized by hydroxyapatite deposits in the tendons of the rotator cuff and is considered a self-limiting disease that can be treated nonoperatively<sup>3</sup>. However, in a substantial group of patients, RCCT can have a very disabling and long-lasting course<sup>1,4</sup>, requiring additional treatment. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous needling and lavage (i.e., barbotage) is a safe and effective treatment option for RCCT<sup>5</sup>. In the present article, we focus on the 1-needle barbotage technique utilized in combination with an injection of corticosteroids in the subacromial bursa.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>It must be emphasized that symptomatic RCCT should be confirmed before barbotage is performed. Therefore, we recommend a diagnostic ultrasound and/or physical examination prior to the barbotage. Barbotage is performed under ultrasound guidance with the patient in the supine position. After sterile preparation and localization of the calcified deposit(s), local anesthesia in the soft tissue (10 mL lidocaine 1%) is administered. Next, the subacromial bursa is injected with 4 mL bupivacaine (5 mg/mL) and 1 mL methylprednisolone (40 mg/mL) with use of a 21G needle. The deposit(s) are then punctured with use of an 18G needle. When the tip of the needle is in the center of the deposit(s), they are flushed with a 0.9% saline solution and the dissolved calcium re-enters the syringe passively. This process is repeated several times until no more calcium enters the syringe. In the case of solid deposits, it may not be possible to aspirate calcium; if so, an attempt to fragment the deposits by repeated perforations, and thus promote resorption, can be made. Postoperatively, patients are instructed to take analgesics and to cool the shoulder.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>RCTT can initially be treated nonoperatively with rest, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and/or physiotherapy<sup>3</sup>. If the initial nonoperative treatment fails, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT), corticosteroid injections, and/or barbotage can be considered<sup>8</sup>. In severe chronic recalcitrant cases, arthroscopic debridement and/or removal can be performed as a last resort.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Both barbotage and ESWT result in a reduction of calcific deposits, as well as significant pain reduction and improvement of function<sup>8</sup>. No standard of care has been established until now; however, several prior meta-analyses concluded that barbotage is the most effective treatment option, with superior clinical outcomes after 1 to 2 years of follow-up<sup>9-11</sup>. No difference in complication rates has been reported between the various minimally invasive techniques. The purpose of barbotage is to stimulate the resorption process, which is promoted by the perforation of the deposits. Clinical outcomes are not associated with the success of the aspiration<sup>7,12</sup>. Patients with ≥1 larger deposit show greater improvement following barbotage than patients with small deposits<sup>12</sup>, in contrast with ESWT, in which larger deposits have been associated with worse outcomes. The inferior outcome of barbotage in patients with small deposits remains the subject of debate, but outcomes may be confounded by the fact that patients with smaller deposits might be less symptomatic at baseline and are therefore less likely to demonstrate improvement<sup>4</sup>.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>In the first weeks after barbotage, there is generally a substantial reduction in symptoms. Symptoms can recur at around 3 months, presumably because the effect of the corticosteroids is temporary<sup>5</sup>. After 6 months and 1 year, patients show substantial improvement in pain, shoulder function, and quality of life, with results superior to those shown for subacromial injections and ESWT<sup>9,10,13,14</sup>. At 5 years postoperatively, there are no significant differences in outcomes between barbotage and subacromial injections<sup>15</sup>. This may demonstrate a self-limiting course in the long term.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>Good candidates for barbotage are those with RCCT who have ≥1 large calcific deposit.If a patient has a solid deposit, the physician can gently rotate and repeatedly puncture the deposit to promote disaggregation and fragmentation.Barbotage generally results in adequate pain relief and functional improvement even in patients in whom calcium deposits cannot be aspirated<sup>12</sup>.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>SAI = injection in the subacromial bursaNSAIDs = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10805427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rotator cuff calcific tendinitis (RCCT) is a commonly occurring disease, with a prevalence of up to 42.5% in patients with shoulder pain1,2. RCCT is characterized by hydroxyapatite deposits in the tendons of the rotator cuff and is considered a self-limiting disease that can be treated nonoperatively3. However, in a substantial group of patients, RCCT can have a very disabling and long-lasting course1,4, requiring additional treatment. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous needling and lavage (i.e., barbotage) is a safe and effective treatment option for RCCT5. In the present article, we focus on the 1-needle barbotage technique utilized in combination with an injection of corticosteroids in the subacromial bursa.

Description: It must be emphasized that symptomatic RCCT should be confirmed before barbotage is performed. Therefore, we recommend a diagnostic ultrasound and/or physical examination prior to the barbotage. Barbotage is performed under ultrasound guidance with the patient in the supine position. After sterile preparation and localization of the calcified deposit(s), local anesthesia in the soft tissue (10 mL lidocaine 1%) is administered. Next, the subacromial bursa is injected with 4 mL bupivacaine (5 mg/mL) and 1 mL methylprednisolone (40 mg/mL) with use of a 21G needle. The deposit(s) are then punctured with use of an 18G needle. When the tip of the needle is in the center of the deposit(s), they are flushed with a 0.9% saline solution and the dissolved calcium re-enters the syringe passively. This process is repeated several times until no more calcium enters the syringe. In the case of solid deposits, it may not be possible to aspirate calcium; if so, an attempt to fragment the deposits by repeated perforations, and thus promote resorption, can be made. Postoperatively, patients are instructed to take analgesics and to cool the shoulder.

Alternatives: RCTT can initially be treated nonoperatively with rest, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and/or physiotherapy3. If the initial nonoperative treatment fails, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT), corticosteroid injections, and/or barbotage can be considered8. In severe chronic recalcitrant cases, arthroscopic debridement and/or removal can be performed as a last resort.

Rationale: Both barbotage and ESWT result in a reduction of calcific deposits, as well as significant pain reduction and improvement of function8. No standard of care has been established until now; however, several prior meta-analyses concluded that barbotage is the most effective treatment option, with superior clinical outcomes after 1 to 2 years of follow-up9-11. No difference in complication rates has been reported between the various minimally invasive techniques. The purpose of barbotage is to stimulate the resorption process, which is promoted by the perforation of the deposits. Clinical outcomes are not associated with the success of the aspiration7,12. Patients with ≥1 larger deposit show greater improvement following barbotage than patients with small deposits12, in contrast with ESWT, in which larger deposits have been associated with worse outcomes. The inferior outcome of barbotage in patients with small deposits remains the subject of debate, but outcomes may be confounded by the fact that patients with smaller deposits might be less symptomatic at baseline and are therefore less likely to demonstrate improvement4.

Expected outcomes: In the first weeks after barbotage, there is generally a substantial reduction in symptoms. Symptoms can recur at around 3 months, presumably because the effect of the corticosteroids is temporary5. After 6 months and 1 year, patients show substantial improvement in pain, shoulder function, and quality of life, with results superior to those shown for subacromial injections and ESWT9,10,13,14. At 5 years postoperatively, there are no significant differences in outcomes between barbotage and subacromial injections15. This may demonstrate a self-limiting course in the long term.

Important tips: Good candidates for barbotage are those with RCCT who have ≥1 large calcific deposit.If a patient has a solid deposit, the physician can gently rotate and repeatedly puncture the deposit to promote disaggregation and fragmentation.Barbotage generally results in adequate pain relief and functional improvement even in patients in whom calcium deposits cannot be aspirated12.

Acronyms and abbreviations: SAI = injection in the subacromial bursaNSAIDs = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肩袖钙化性腱鞘炎的针刺和冲洗:超声引导技术。
背景:肩袖钙化性肌腱炎(RCCT)是一种常见疾病,在肩痛患者中发病率高达 42.5%1,2。肩袖钙化性肌腱炎的特点是羟基磷灰石沉积在肩袖肌腱中,被认为是一种可通过非手术治疗的自限性疾病3。然而,在相当一部分患者中,RCCT 可导致严重的致残性和长期的病程1,4,需要额外的治疗。超声引导下经皮针刺和灌洗(即巴氏针)是治疗 RCCT 的一种安全有效的方法5。在本文中,我们将重点介绍在肩峰下滑囊注射皮质类固醇的同时使用 1 针刺洗技术:必须强调的是,有症状的 RCCT 应在实施倒钩前得到确认。因此,我们建议在实施肩关节切开术前进行超声波诊断和/或体格检查。Barbotage 在超声引导下进行,患者取仰卧位。在无菌准备和定位钙化沉积物后,对软组织进行局部麻醉(10 毫升 1%利多卡因)。然后,使用 21G 针头向肩峰下滑囊注射 4 毫升布比卡因(5 毫克/毫升)和 1 毫升甲基强的松龙(40 毫克/毫升)。然后使用 18G 注射针穿刺沉积物。当针尖位于沉积物中心时,用 0.9% 的生理盐水冲洗沉积物,溶解的钙被动地重新进入注射器。此过程重复多次,直到没有钙进入注射器。如果是固体沉积物,则可能无法吸出钙质;如果是固体沉积物,则可以尝试通过反复穿孔使沉积物破碎,从而促进吸收。术后指导患者服用止痛药并冷却肩部:RCTT最初可通过休息、非甾体抗炎药物和/或物理疗法进行非手术治疗3。如果最初的非手术治疗无效,可考虑采用体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)、皮质类固醇注射和/或巴氏疗法8。在严重的慢性顽固性病例中,关节镜清创术和/或切除术是最后的选择。理由:钙化沉积物的减少以及疼痛的明显减轻和功能的显著改善都得益于体外冲击波疗法8。到目前为止,还没有确定治疗的标准;不过,之前的几项荟萃分析得出结论, barbotage 是最有效的治疗方案,随访 1 到 2 年后的临床疗效更佳9-11。各种微创技术的并发症发生率没有差异。打孔术的目的是刺激沉积物的吸收过程,而沉积物的吸收过程是通过打孔来促进的。临床结果与抽吸成功与否无关7,12。与 ESWT 相反,沉积物越多,疗效越差。沉积物较小的患者接受 barbotage 治疗的效果较差,这一点仍存在争议,但结果可能会受到以下事实的影响:沉积物较小的患者基线症状可能较轻,因此不太可能出现改善4:巴氏治疗后的头几周,症状通常会大幅减轻。症状可能会在 3 个月左右复发,这可能是因为皮质类固醇的作用是暂时的5。6 个月和 1 年后,患者在疼痛、肩关节功能和生活质量方面均有显著改善,效果优于肩峰下注射和 ESWT9,10,13,14。术后 5 年,巴氏疗法和肩峰下注射疗法的疗效无明显差异15。从长远来看,这可能是一种自限性病程:如果患者有固体沉积物,医生可轻轻旋转并反复穿刺沉积物,以促进分解和碎裂。即使是无法吸出钙沉积物的患者,进行 Barbotage 也能充分缓解疼痛并改善功能12:SAI = 肩峰下滑囊注射NSAIDs = 非甾体抗炎药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques (JBJS EST) is the premier journal describing how to perform orthopaedic surgical procedures, verified by evidence-based outcomes, vetted by peer review, while utilizing online delivery, imagery and video to optimize the educational experience, thereby enhancing patient care.
期刊最新文献
Bikini Incision Modification of the Direct Anterior Approach. Closed Intramedullary Pinning of Displaced Radial Neck Fracture (Metaizeau Technique). Flexible Intramedullary Nail Placement in Pediatric Humerus Fractures. Ligamentum Flavum Flap Technique in Lumbar Microdiscectomy. Surgery for Pediatric Trigger Finger.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1