Low dose pipamperone therapy for major depression: A randomized controlled clinical trial comparison with citalopram

Erik Buntinx , Lars Bastiaanse , Alan S. Schatzberg , Charles B. Nemeroff , Philip D. Harvey
{"title":"Low dose pipamperone therapy for major depression: A randomized controlled clinical trial comparison with citalopram","authors":"Erik Buntinx ,&nbsp;Lars Bastiaanse ,&nbsp;Alan S. Schatzberg ,&nbsp;Charles B. Nemeroff ,&nbsp;Philip D. Harvey","doi":"10.1016/j.pmip.2024.100115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Serotonin-Dopamine antagonists (SDA) have been evaluated as monotherapy and augmentation therapy for major depression (MDD) Despite evidence of efficacy for both, adverse events with SDA are considerably greater than for monotherapy. In this randomized clinical trial, low doses of pipamperone, an SDA approved in the EU, were used to treat major depression. We were in efficacy across treatments and the relative safety of pipamperone compared to previous treatments with SDA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this study, patients with MDD (n = 555; 535 received treatment) were randomized to low dose pipamperone plus placebo, citalopram plus placebo, or pipamperone plus citalopram in a 10-week efficacy study. Adverse events and clinician efficacy ratings with MADRS were examined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study was completed by 383 participants, with the most common reason for drop out being withdrawal of consent. All three arms showed treatment-related changes with no significant differences between treatments (all effect sizes from larger than d = 1.48, largest = 1.77: pipamperone plus citalopram). Drop-outs due to adverse events were 4 % with pipamperone monotherapy, compared to 3 % with citalopram alone. There were no differences in weight gain across the treatments and EPS was reported by one case and tremor was reported by two cases with combined treatment arm. Nausea was more common with citalopram monotherapy (16 % vs 9 % for pipamperone).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These data suggest that low doses of pipamperone have a substantially better safety profile than previous SDA medications used to treat MDD and that pipamperone has potential to be an efficacious treatment for MD, as monotherapy or combination therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Trials Registration</h3><p>This trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov: (NCT01312922).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19837,"journal":{"name":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468171724000012/pdfft?md5=509d7728ba0ab0afc449f0ac6a4c8bd1&pid=1-s2.0-S2468171724000012-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468171724000012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Serotonin-Dopamine antagonists (SDA) have been evaluated as monotherapy and augmentation therapy for major depression (MDD) Despite evidence of efficacy for both, adverse events with SDA are considerably greater than for monotherapy. In this randomized clinical trial, low doses of pipamperone, an SDA approved in the EU, were used to treat major depression. We were in efficacy across treatments and the relative safety of pipamperone compared to previous treatments with SDA.

Methods

In this study, patients with MDD (n = 555; 535 received treatment) were randomized to low dose pipamperone plus placebo, citalopram plus placebo, or pipamperone plus citalopram in a 10-week efficacy study. Adverse events and clinician efficacy ratings with MADRS were examined.

Results

The study was completed by 383 participants, with the most common reason for drop out being withdrawal of consent. All three arms showed treatment-related changes with no significant differences between treatments (all effect sizes from larger than d = 1.48, largest = 1.77: pipamperone plus citalopram). Drop-outs due to adverse events were 4 % with pipamperone monotherapy, compared to 3 % with citalopram alone. There were no differences in weight gain across the treatments and EPS was reported by one case and tremor was reported by two cases with combined treatment arm. Nausea was more common with citalopram monotherapy (16 % vs 9 % for pipamperone).

Conclusions

These data suggest that low doses of pipamperone have a substantially better safety profile than previous SDA medications used to treat MDD and that pipamperone has potential to be an efficacious treatment for MD, as monotherapy or combination therapy.

Clinical Trials Registration

This trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov: (NCT01312922).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低剂量哌潘立酮治疗重度抑郁症:与西酞普兰的随机对照临床试验比较
尽管有证据表明羟色胺-多巴胺拮抗剂(SDA)对重度抑郁症(MDD)均有疗效,但其不良反应却大大高于单药治疗。在这项随机临床试验中,欧盟批准的一种 SDA--低剂量哌潘立酮被用于治疗重度抑郁症。在这项为期 10 周的疗效研究中,我们将 MDD 患者(n = 555;535 人接受了治疗)随机分配到低剂量哌潘立酮加安慰剂、西酞普兰加安慰剂或哌潘立酮加西酞普兰的治疗方案中。结果383名参与者完成了研究,最常见的退出原因是撤回同意书。所有三个治疗组都出现了与治疗相关的变化,但治疗间无显著差异(所有效应大小均大于 d = 1.48,最大 = 1.77:哌潘酮加西酞普兰)。哌潘立酮单药治疗因不良反应而退出治疗的比例为4%,而单独使用西酞普兰的比例为3%。不同治疗方案在体重增加方面没有差异,联合治疗组有一例报告了EPS,两例报告了震颤。结论这些数据表明,小剂量哌潘立酮的安全性大大优于以前用于治疗MDD的SDA药物,而且哌潘立酮有可能成为一种治疗MDD的有效药物,无论是作为单一疗法还是联合疗法。临床试验注册本试验已在clinicaltrials.gov上注册:(NCT01312922)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy as an adjunctive treatment for treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review The role of meta-cognitive and emotional beliefs, and negative repetitive thinking in the relationship between emotional abuse and psychological distress in psychiatric outpatients: A serial multiple mediation model Low handgrip strength is a risk factor for symptoms of anxiety and depression in survivors breast cancer patients BDNF blood levels as a potential biomarker Predictor of treatment response and remission in bipolar depression Erratum regarding missing ethical statements in previously published articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1