Examining the association between men's gender equitable attitudes and contraceptive outcomes in rural Maharashtra, India

Mohan Ghule , Anvita Dixit , Nicole E. Johns , Madhusudana Battala , Shahina Begum , Sarah Averbach , Jay G. Silverman , Niranjan Saggurti , Anita Raj
{"title":"Examining the association between men's gender equitable attitudes and contraceptive outcomes in rural Maharashtra, India","authors":"Mohan Ghule ,&nbsp;Anvita Dixit ,&nbsp;Nicole E. Johns ,&nbsp;Madhusudana Battala ,&nbsp;Shahina Begum ,&nbsp;Sarah Averbach ,&nbsp;Jay G. Silverman ,&nbsp;Niranjan Saggurti ,&nbsp;Anita Raj","doi":"10.1016/j.dialog.2024.100168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Previous literature suggests that men reporting more gender-equitable attitudes are more likely to use condoms, but there is a paucity of data evaluating whether these attitudes are associated with contraceptive communication and use. The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that men reporting more gender-equitable attitudes will be more likely to (a) engage in contraceptive communication with their wives and (b) that they and/or their wives will be more likely to use all forms of family planning, compared to men with less equitable attitudes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using cross-sectional dyadic survey data from young married couples from rural Maharashtra, India (<em>N</em> = 989), we assessed the associations between men's gender role attitudes and a) spousal contraceptive communication and b) contraceptive use by type (none, traditional, condoms, pills, or IUD). The contraceptive use outcome is based on wives' report. We assessed these associations via bivariate <em>t</em>-test (communication outcome) or ANOVA test (contraceptive type outcome), as well as unadjusted and adjusted logistic (communication outcome) and multinomial logistic (contraceptive type outcome) regression models. Adjusted models included sociodemographic factors selected a priori based on established associations with gender-equitable attitudes and/or our assessed outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Men with more gender-equitable attitudes were more likely to discuss family planning with their wives (AOR = 1·05, 95%CI 1·03-1·07, <em>p</em> &lt; 0·001) and to use condoms (ARRR = 1·03, 95%CI 1·00-1·06, <em>p</em> = 0·07). There was no association between gender-equitable attitudes and use of other types of contraception.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>While gender-equitable attitudes among men may facilitate condom use and family planning communication in marriage, they do not appear to be linked with greater likelihood of use of more effective types of contraceptive use. This suggests that males supportive of gender equity may take greater responsibility for family planning vis a vis a less effective contraceptive, condoms, in the absence of more effective short-acting contraceptives for men.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>The <span>National Institutes of Health</span> [Grant number <span>5R01HD084453-01A1</span>] and the <span>Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation</span>, Seattle, WA [grant number <span>INV-002967</span>].</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72803,"journal":{"name":"Dialogues in health","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772653324000042/pdfft?md5=2358270151454f3d577968005eba178a&pid=1-s2.0-S2772653324000042-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogues in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772653324000042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Previous literature suggests that men reporting more gender-equitable attitudes are more likely to use condoms, but there is a paucity of data evaluating whether these attitudes are associated with contraceptive communication and use. The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that men reporting more gender-equitable attitudes will be more likely to (a) engage in contraceptive communication with their wives and (b) that they and/or their wives will be more likely to use all forms of family planning, compared to men with less equitable attitudes.

Methods

Using cross-sectional dyadic survey data from young married couples from rural Maharashtra, India (N = 989), we assessed the associations between men's gender role attitudes and a) spousal contraceptive communication and b) contraceptive use by type (none, traditional, condoms, pills, or IUD). The contraceptive use outcome is based on wives' report. We assessed these associations via bivariate t-test (communication outcome) or ANOVA test (contraceptive type outcome), as well as unadjusted and adjusted logistic (communication outcome) and multinomial logistic (contraceptive type outcome) regression models. Adjusted models included sociodemographic factors selected a priori based on established associations with gender-equitable attitudes and/or our assessed outcomes.

Findings

Men with more gender-equitable attitudes were more likely to discuss family planning with their wives (AOR = 1·05, 95%CI 1·03-1·07, p < 0·001) and to use condoms (ARRR = 1·03, 95%CI 1·00-1·06, p = 0·07). There was no association between gender-equitable attitudes and use of other types of contraception.

Interpretation

While gender-equitable attitudes among men may facilitate condom use and family planning communication in marriage, they do not appear to be linked with greater likelihood of use of more effective types of contraceptive use. This suggests that males supportive of gender equity may take greater responsibility for family planning vis a vis a less effective contraceptive, condoms, in the absence of more effective short-acting contraceptives for men.

Funding

The National Institutes of Health [Grant number 5R01HD084453-01A1] and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA [grant number INV-002967].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究印度马哈拉施特拉邦农村地区男性的性别平等态度与避孕结果之间的关系
背景以前的文献表明,持性别平等态度的男性更有可能使用安全套,但评估这些态度是否与避孕沟通和使用相关的数据却很少。本研究的目的是检验以下假设:与态度不够公平的男性相比,态度较为公平的男性更有可能(a)与妻子进行避孕沟通,以及(b)他们和/或他们的妻子更有可能使用各种形式的计划生育措施。方法利用印度马哈拉施特拉邦农村地区年轻已婚夫妇的横断面双向调查数据(N = 989),我们评估了男性的性别角色态度与 a) 配偶避孕沟通和 b) 避孕药具使用类型(无、传统、避孕套、避孕药或宫内节育器)之间的关联。避孕药具的使用结果是根据妻子的报告得出的。我们通过双变量 t 检验(沟通结果)或方差分析检验(避孕药具类型结果)以及未调整和调整的 logistic(沟通结果)和多项式 logistic(避孕药具类型结果)回归模型来评估这些关联。调整后的模型包括根据与性别平等态度和/或我们评估的结果之间的既定关联而预先选择的社会人口因素。研究结果:性别平等态度较好的男性更有可能与妻子讨论计划生育问题(AOR = 1-05,95%CI 1-03-1-07,p <0-001)和使用避孕套(ARRR = 1-03,95%CI 1-00-1-06,p = 0-07)。虽然男性的性别平等态度可能会促进安全套的使用和婚姻中的计划生育沟通,但似乎与更有可能使用更有效类型的避孕药具没有关联。这表明,在缺乏对男性更有效的短效避孕药物的情况下,支持性别平等的男性可能会对避孕效果较差的避孕药物--安全套--承担更大的计划生育责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dialogues in health
Dialogues in health Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
134 days
期刊最新文献
Correlation between fall experience and life functions among community-dwelling older adults in Japan Breaking barriers: A gender-based quota system in nursing school admission in Bangladesh Success rates and adherence to antiretroviral therapy among treatment-naïve patients in Davao City, Philippines: A ten-year retrospective cohort study An overlooked risk for skin health: Less availability and higher cost of sunscreen for people with melanated skin Genomic analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 variants circulated in the Philippines, 2020–2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1