Trust in artificial intelligence: Literature review and main path analysis

Bruno Miranda Henrique , Eugene Santos Jr.
{"title":"Trust in artificial intelligence: Literature review and main path analysis","authors":"Bruno Miranda Henrique ,&nbsp;Eugene Santos Jr.","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is present in various modern systems, but it is still subject to acceptance in many fields. Medical diagnosis, autonomous driving cars, recommender systems and robotics are examples of areas in which some humans distrust AI technology, which ultimately leads to low acceptance rates. Conversely, those same applications can have humans who over rely on AI, acting as recommended by the systems with no criticism regarding the risks of a wrong decision. Therefore, there is an optimal balance with respect to trust in AI, achieved by calibration of expectations and capabilities. In this context, the literature about factors influencing trust in AI and its calibration is scattered among research fields, with no objective summaries of the overall evolution of the theme. In order to close this gap, this paper contributes a literature review of the most influential papers on the subject of trust in AI, selected by quantitative methods. It also proposes a Main Path Analysis of the literature, highlighting how the theme has evolved over the years. As results, researchers will find an overview on trust in AI based on the most important papers objectively selected and also tendencies and opportunities for future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"2 1","pages":"Article 100043"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000033/pdfft?md5=730364a034e2bd4ec1f23bf724f7adef&pid=1-s2.0-S2949882124000033-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is present in various modern systems, but it is still subject to acceptance in many fields. Medical diagnosis, autonomous driving cars, recommender systems and robotics are examples of areas in which some humans distrust AI technology, which ultimately leads to low acceptance rates. Conversely, those same applications can have humans who over rely on AI, acting as recommended by the systems with no criticism regarding the risks of a wrong decision. Therefore, there is an optimal balance with respect to trust in AI, achieved by calibration of expectations and capabilities. In this context, the literature about factors influencing trust in AI and its calibration is scattered among research fields, with no objective summaries of the overall evolution of the theme. In order to close this gap, this paper contributes a literature review of the most influential papers on the subject of trust in AI, selected by quantitative methods. It also proposes a Main Path Analysis of the literature, highlighting how the theme has evolved over the years. As results, researchers will find an overview on trust in AI based on the most important papers objectively selected and also tendencies and opportunities for future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能中的信任:文献综述和主要路径分析
人工智能(AI)存在于各种现代系统中,但在许多领域仍有待接受。医疗诊断、自动驾驶汽车、推荐系统和机器人技术都是一些人类不信任人工智能技术的领域,最终导致接受率低下。反之,同样是这些应用,人类也可能过度依赖人工智能,按照系统的建议行事,对错误决策的风险不闻不问。因此,对人工智能的信任需要一个最佳平衡点,通过校准期望值和能力来实现。在这种情况下,有关影响人工智能信任度及其校准的因素的文献散见于各个研究领域,没有对这一主题的整体演变进行客观总结。为了填补这一空白,本文通过定量方法,对人工智能信任主题中最具影响力的论文进行了文献综述。本文还提出了文献的主要路径分析,强调了该主题多年来的演变过程。研究人员将根据客观筛选出的最重要文献,对人工智能中的信任问题进行综述,并发现未来研究的趋势和机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can ChatGPT read who you are? Understanding young adults’ attitudes towards using AI chatbots for psychotherapy: The role of self-stigma Aversion against machines with complex mental abilities: The role of individual differences Differences between human and artificial/augmented intelligence in medicine Integrating sound effects and background music in Robotic storytelling – A series of online studies across different story genres
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1