Are changes in antibiotic prophylaxis recommendations responsible for an increased risk of cefazolin allergy?

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-24 DOI:10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101349
Nicolas Chéron , Luc de Chaisemartin , Simon Aubert , Felix Laborier , Philippe Montravers , Catherine Neukirch , Aurélie Gouel-Chéron
{"title":"Are changes in antibiotic prophylaxis recommendations responsible for an increased risk of cefazolin allergy?","authors":"Nicolas Chéron ,&nbsp;Luc de Chaisemartin ,&nbsp;Simon Aubert ,&nbsp;Felix Laborier ,&nbsp;Philippe Montravers ,&nbsp;Catherine Neukirch ,&nbsp;Aurélie Gouel-Chéron","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The first line of prevention of surgical site infection relies on the timely administration of antibiotic prophylaxis. First- and second-generation cephalosporins are the most recommended antibiotics in elective surgery. The incidence of cefazolin allergy has increased worldwide over the years. The sensitization mechanism of cefazolin is currently unknown, and data supporting cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins are lacking. Sensitization could occur through previous exposure either to cefazolin or to structurally related chemical agents. The objective of this study was to evaluate sensitization agents towards cefazolin.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The OpenBabel chemoinformatics toolbox was used to search for similarities between cefazolin and other molecules in an extensive drug database. Using the pholcodine-rocuronium similarity score as a threshold, we selected drugs with the most similar structure to that of cefazolin. Exposure to those drugs and cefazolin was assessed in a cohort of patients with skin test-proven cefazolin allergy at a specialized allergy centre via a self-administered anonymous questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Using the pholcodine-rocuronium similarity score as a threshold (score≥0.7), 42 molecules were found to be similar to cefazolin (all cephalosporins). Only 8 were marketed in France. None of the 14 cefazolin-allergic patients who answered the questionnaire (65% female, median age 56 years) reported exposure to any identified antibiotics. In contrast, 11 (78%) had at least one previous surgery requiring cefazolin before the index case.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Direct previous cefazolin exposure was identified in 78% of cefazolin-allergic patients. Cefazolin started to take a central place in antibiotic prophylaxis after 2010, when cefamandole usage decreased drastically. Changes in antibiotic prophylaxis over the past 14 years in France could have been the turning point for the increased incidence of cefazolin allergy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":"43 2","pages":"Article 101349"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The first line of prevention of surgical site infection relies on the timely administration of antibiotic prophylaxis. First- and second-generation cephalosporins are the most recommended antibiotics in elective surgery. The incidence of cefazolin allergy has increased worldwide over the years. The sensitization mechanism of cefazolin is currently unknown, and data supporting cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins are lacking. Sensitization could occur through previous exposure either to cefazolin or to structurally related chemical agents. The objective of this study was to evaluate sensitization agents towards cefazolin.

Methods

The OpenBabel chemoinformatics toolbox was used to search for similarities between cefazolin and other molecules in an extensive drug database. Using the pholcodine-rocuronium similarity score as a threshold, we selected drugs with the most similar structure to that of cefazolin. Exposure to those drugs and cefazolin was assessed in a cohort of patients with skin test-proven cefazolin allergy at a specialized allergy centre via a self-administered anonymous questionnaire.

Results

Using the pholcodine-rocuronium similarity score as a threshold (score≥0.7), 42 molecules were found to be similar to cefazolin (all cephalosporins). Only 8 were marketed in France. None of the 14 cefazolin-allergic patients who answered the questionnaire (65% female, median age 56 years) reported exposure to any identified antibiotics. In contrast, 11 (78%) had at least one previous surgery requiring cefazolin before the index case.

Conclusion

Direct previous cefazolin exposure was identified in 78% of cefazolin-allergic patients. Cefazolin started to take a central place in antibiotic prophylaxis after 2010, when cefamandole usage decreased drastically. Changes in antibiotic prophylaxis over the past 14 years in France could have been the turning point for the increased incidence of cefazolin allergy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗生素预防建议的变化是否是导致头孢唑啉过敏风险增加的原因?
背景手术部位感染的第一道预防措施是及时使用抗生素预防。第一代和第二代头孢菌素是择期手术中最推荐使用的抗生素。近年来,头孢唑啉过敏的发生率在全球范围内有所上升。头孢唑啉的致敏机制目前尚不清楚,也缺乏支持青霉素类和头孢菌素类之间交叉反应的数据。致敏的原因可能是以前接触过头孢唑啉或结构相关的化学制剂。本研究的目的是评估头孢唑啉的致敏剂。方法使用 OpenBabel 化学信息学工具箱在广泛的药物数据库中搜索头孢唑啉和其他分子之间的相似性。以酚妥拉明-俄库铵相似度得分作为阈值,我们选出了与头孢唑啉结构最相似的药物。结果以pholcodine-rocuronium相似度得分作为阈值(得分≥0.7),发现有42种分子与头孢唑啉相似(均为头孢菌素类)。只有 8 种在法国上市。在回答问卷的 14 位头孢唑啉过敏症患者(65% 为女性,中位年龄 56 岁)中,没有一人报告曾接触过任何已确定的抗生素。与此相反,11 名患者(78%)在发病前至少做过一次需要使用头孢唑啉的手术。2010年后,头孢唑啉开始在抗生素预防中占据中心位置,而当时头孢孟多的使用量急剧下降。法国在过去14年中抗生素预防措施的变化可能是头孢唑啉过敏发病率上升的转折点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.
期刊最新文献
The association between neuraxial labor analgesia and subacute pain after childbirth: a randomized controlled trial. Prevention of perioperative venous thromboembolism: 2024 guidelines from the French Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis (GIHP) developed in collaboration with the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR), the French Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SFTH) and the French Society of Vascular Medicine (SFMV) and endorsed by the French Society of Digestive Surgery (SFCD), the French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (SFPT) and INNOVTE (Investigation Network On Venous ThromboEmbolism) network. Developing a sustainable team in critical care: focus on gender-based diversity Intraoperative ketamine and pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS): A systematic review and meta-analysis Is quantitative neuromuscular monitoring mandatory after administration of the recommended dose of sugammadex? A prospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1