A refinement-based approach to safe smart contract deployment and evolution

IF 2 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Software and Systems Modeling Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1007/s10270-023-01143-z
Pedro Antonino, Juliandson Ferreira, Augusto Sampaio, A. W. Roscoe, Filipe Arruda
{"title":"A refinement-based approach to safe smart contract deployment and evolution","authors":"Pedro Antonino, Juliandson Ferreira, Augusto Sampaio, A. W. Roscoe, Filipe Arruda","doi":"10.1007/s10270-023-01143-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In our previous work, we proposed a verification framework that shifts from the “code is law” to a new “specification is law” paradigm related to the safe evolution of smart contracts. The framework proposed there relaxed the well-established requirement that, once a smart contract is deployed in a blockchain, its code is expected to be immutable. More flexibly, contracts are allowed to be created and upgraded provided they meet a corresponding formal specification that was fixed. In the current paper, we extend this framework to allow specifications to evolve, provided a refinement notion is preserved. We propose a notion of specification refinement tailored for smart contracts and a methodology for checking it. In addition to weakening preconditions and strengthening postconditions and invariants, we allow for the change of data representation and interface extension. Thus, we are able to reason about a significantly wider class of smart contract evolution histories, when contrasted with the original framework. The new framework is centred around <i>a trusted deployer</i>: an off-chain service that formally verifies and enforces the notions of implementation conformance and specification refinement. We have investigated its applicability to the safe deployment and upgrade of contracts implementing widely used Ethereum standards (the ERC20 Token Standard, the ERC3156 Flash Loans, the ERC1155 Multi Token Standard and The ERC721 standard for Non-Fungible Tokens); we handle evolutions possibly involving changes in data representation and interface extensions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49507,"journal":{"name":"Software and Systems Modeling","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Software and Systems Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-023-01143-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In our previous work, we proposed a verification framework that shifts from the “code is law” to a new “specification is law” paradigm related to the safe evolution of smart contracts. The framework proposed there relaxed the well-established requirement that, once a smart contract is deployed in a blockchain, its code is expected to be immutable. More flexibly, contracts are allowed to be created and upgraded provided they meet a corresponding formal specification that was fixed. In the current paper, we extend this framework to allow specifications to evolve, provided a refinement notion is preserved. We propose a notion of specification refinement tailored for smart contracts and a methodology for checking it. In addition to weakening preconditions and strengthening postconditions and invariants, we allow for the change of data representation and interface extension. Thus, we are able to reason about a significantly wider class of smart contract evolution histories, when contrasted with the original framework. The new framework is centred around a trusted deployer: an off-chain service that formally verifies and enforces the notions of implementation conformance and specification refinement. We have investigated its applicability to the safe deployment and upgrade of contracts implementing widely used Ethereum standards (the ERC20 Token Standard, the ERC3156 Flash Loans, the ERC1155 Multi Token Standard and The ERC721 standard for Non-Fungible Tokens); we handle evolutions possibly involving changes in data representation and interface extensions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于完善的安全智能合约部署和演进方法
在我们之前的工作中,我们提出了一个验证框架,从 "代码即法律 "转变为与智能合约安全演进相关的新的 "规范即法律 "范式。该框架放宽了智能合约一旦部署到区块链中,其代码就必须是不可变的这一既定要求。更为灵活的是,只要符合相应的固定形式规范,就可以创建和升级合约。在本文中,我们对这一框架进行了扩展,允许规范在保留细化概念的前提下不断演进。我们提出了一个为智能合约量身定制的规范细化概念和一种检查方法。除了弱化前置条件、强化后置条件和不变式外,我们还允许改变数据表示和接口扩展。因此,与原始框架相比,我们能够推理出更广泛的智能合约演化历史。新框架以可信部署器为中心:它是一种链外服务,可以正式验证和执行执行一致性和规范完善的概念。我们研究了该框架在安全部署和升级执行广泛使用的以太坊标准(ERC20 代币标准、ERC3156 Flash Loans、ERC1155 多代币标准和 ERC721 非流通代币标准)的合约方面的适用性;我们处理的演进可能涉及数据表示和接口扩展的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Software and Systems Modeling
Software and Systems Modeling 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: We invite authors to submit papers that discuss and analyze research challenges and experiences pertaining to software and system modeling languages, techniques, tools, practices and other facets. The following are some of the topic areas that are of special interest, but the journal publishes on a wide range of software and systems modeling concerns: Domain-specific models and modeling standards; Model-based testing techniques; Model-based simulation techniques; Formal syntax and semantics of modeling languages such as the UML; Rigorous model-based analysis; Model composition, refinement and transformation; Software Language Engineering; Modeling Languages in Science and Engineering; Language Adaptation and Composition; Metamodeling techniques; Measuring quality of models and languages; Ontological approaches to model engineering; Generating test and code artifacts from models; Model synthesis; Methodology; Model development tool environments; Modeling Cyberphysical Systems; Data intensive modeling; Derivation of explicit models from data; Case studies and experience reports with significant modeling lessons learned; Comparative analyses of modeling languages and techniques; Scientific assessment of modeling practices
期刊最新文献
A model template for reachability-based containment checking of imprecise observations in timed automata Supporting method engineering with a low-code approach: the LOMET  tool A system-theoretic assurance framework for safety-driven systems engineering IAT/ML: a metamodel and modelling approach for discourse analysis Universal conceptual modeling: principles, benefits, and an agenda for conceptual modeling research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1