Peatland restoration in Norway – evaluation of ongoing monitoring and identification of plant indicators of restoration success

IF 1 4区 生物学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES Nordic Journal of Botany Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI:10.1111/njb.03988
Magni Olsen Kyrkjeeide, Mari Jokerud, Anne Catriona Mehlhoop, Linn Marie Foldnes Lunde, Marte Fandrem, Anders Lyngstad
{"title":"Peatland restoration in Norway – evaluation of ongoing monitoring and identification of plant indicators of restoration success","authors":"Magni Olsen Kyrkjeeide, Mari Jokerud, Anne Catriona Mehlhoop, Linn Marie Foldnes Lunde, Marte Fandrem, Anders Lyngstad","doi":"10.1111/njb.03988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Norway launched a national action plan on wetland restoration in 2016. So far, 90% of the restoration effort has been on peatland restoration, with about 140 mires restored so far. There are three main restoration goals stated in the action plan: 1) limit greenhouse gas (GHG) emission, 2) climate adaptation and 3) improved ecological condition. Quantifying the outcome of the restoration actions is necessary to evaluate whether the goals of the action plan are met. A vegetation monitoring protocol was suggested before restoration started and has been implemented at five restoration sites. As the peatland restoration effort in Norway is increasing, it is timely to evaluate if the data currently collected can measure peatland restoration outcome. We evaluate the monitoring protocol based on statistical analyses of the data collected at two sites, describe how indicator species can be identified using generalized composition data used as the basis for classifying habitats in Norway (EcoSyst framework), and suggest the way forward for peatland restoration monitoring in Norway. Data collected according to the monitoring protocol can document changes in species composition at restoration sites, but has limitations when the ecological complexity at the sites increases and reference sites are unavailable. We argue that adjusting the monitoring protocol will: 1) facilitate alignment with existing peatland research; 2) connect better with monitoring programs where data is collected applying EcoSyst framework principles; and 3) enable upscaling to cover the wide variation emerging in peatland restoration.","PeriodicalId":54716,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Botany","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.03988","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Norway launched a national action plan on wetland restoration in 2016. So far, 90% of the restoration effort has been on peatland restoration, with about 140 mires restored so far. There are three main restoration goals stated in the action plan: 1) limit greenhouse gas (GHG) emission, 2) climate adaptation and 3) improved ecological condition. Quantifying the outcome of the restoration actions is necessary to evaluate whether the goals of the action plan are met. A vegetation monitoring protocol was suggested before restoration started and has been implemented at five restoration sites. As the peatland restoration effort in Norway is increasing, it is timely to evaluate if the data currently collected can measure peatland restoration outcome. We evaluate the monitoring protocol based on statistical analyses of the data collected at two sites, describe how indicator species can be identified using generalized composition data used as the basis for classifying habitats in Norway (EcoSyst framework), and suggest the way forward for peatland restoration monitoring in Norway. Data collected according to the monitoring protocol can document changes in species composition at restoration sites, but has limitations when the ecological complexity at the sites increases and reference sites are unavailable. We argue that adjusting the monitoring protocol will: 1) facilitate alignment with existing peatland research; 2) connect better with monitoring programs where data is collected applying EcoSyst framework principles; and 3) enable upscaling to cover the wide variation emerging in peatland restoration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挪威的泥炭地恢复--对持续监测的评估和恢复成功的植物指标的确定
挪威于2016年启动了一项湿地恢复国家行动计划。到目前为止,90%的恢复工作都集中在泥炭地恢复上,迄今已恢复了约140块沼泽地。该行动计划提出了三大恢复目标:1)限制温室气体(GHG)排放;2)适应气候;3)改善生态条件。要评估行动计划的目标是否已经实现,就必须量化恢复行动的成果。在恢复工作开始之前,我们提出了植被监测协议,并已在五个恢复地点实施。随着挪威泥炭地恢复工作的不断增加,现在正是评估目前收集的数据能否衡量泥炭地恢复成果的时候。我们根据在两个地点收集到的数据进行统计分析,对监测方案进行评估,说明如何利用作为挪威生境分类基础的广义组成数据(EcoSyst 框架)确定指示物种,并对挪威泥炭地恢复监测的未来发展方向提出建议。根据监测方案收集的数据可以记录恢复地点物种组成的变化,但当恢复地点的生态复杂性增加且无法获得参照地点时,这些数据就会受到限制。我们认为,调整监测方案将1)便于与现有泥炭地研究保持一致;2)更好地与采用生态科学框架原则收集数据的监测项目联系起来;3)能够扩大规模,以涵盖泥炭地恢复过程中出现的各种变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Botany
Nordic Journal of Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
100
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Nordic Journal of Botany publishes original contributions on all aspects of the taxonomy, evolution, conservation, ecology and biogeography of plants (including algae and bryophytes) and fungi.
期刊最新文献
Corrections to: “Ferdinand Schur's taxa of Iridaceae, their revision and effective typification of names” Begonia bijantiae, a new species of Begonia from Arunachal Pradesh, northeast India and notes on Begonia ovatifolia Broadening the horizon of Indian mycobiota: two new species and one new generic record in Boletoid mushrooms (Boletaceae) Lectotypification of Ceropegia driophila (Apocynaceae) and proposal of Ceropegia paohsingensis as a heterotypic synonym Conservation status of three rare endemic Phaseolus bean (Leguminosae, Phaseoleae) species of Costa Rica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1