Diffusion tensor imaging: survival analysis prediction in breast cancer patients.

Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-26 DOI:10.1007/s00117-023-01254-0
Devrim Ulaş Urut, Derya Karabulut, Savaş Hereklioglu, Gulşah Özdemir, Berkin Anıl Cicin, Bekir Hacıoglu, Necet Süt, Nermin Tunçbilek
{"title":"Diffusion tensor imaging: survival analysis prediction in breast cancer patients.","authors":"Devrim Ulaş Urut, Derya Karabulut, Savaş Hereklioglu, Gulşah Özdemir, Berkin Anıl Cicin, Bekir Hacıoglu, Necet Süt, Nermin Tunçbilek","doi":"10.1007/s00117-023-01254-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to explore the performance of diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) parameters in evaluating disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with invasive breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 49 women with invasive breast cancer who were diagnosed between 2017 and 2022 were included. All patients underwent breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with DTI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) features, with examiners blinded to the clinical data. Volume anisotropy (VA), fractional anisotropy (FA), and ADC values were measured to assess intratumoral measured heterogeneity. Correlations and differences in diffusion metrics according to OS and DFS status of the cases were analyzed. The discriminative ability of the quantitative findings was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses and validated in the independent cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated patients with metastases (n = 13, 36.5%) and those without metastases (n = 36, 73.5%). Differences in the ADC, FA, and VA values were observed. The results of Cox regression survival analysis for all the patients included in the survival analysis revealed that DTI metrics contributed to the prediction of overall survival (OS) in the emerging models (p < 0.05). Both FA and VA were associated with OS (p = 0.037 and p = 0.038, respectively). However, ADC was not associated with OS (p = 0.177) or DFS (p = 0.252).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the prognostic value of DTI-MRI in breast cancer with statistical survival analysis techniques. We believe that DTI measurements can be used as a biomarker for OS analysis in breast cancer given the available data.</p>","PeriodicalId":74635,"journal":{"name":"Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"54-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-023-01254-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to explore the performance of diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) parameters in evaluating disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Material and methods: A total of 49 women with invasive breast cancer who were diagnosed between 2017 and 2022 were included. All patients underwent breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with DTI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) features, with examiners blinded to the clinical data. Volume anisotropy (VA), fractional anisotropy (FA), and ADC values were measured to assess intratumoral measured heterogeneity. Correlations and differences in diffusion metrics according to OS and DFS status of the cases were analyzed. The discriminative ability of the quantitative findings was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses and validated in the independent cohort.

Results: We evaluated patients with metastases (n = 13, 36.5%) and those without metastases (n = 36, 73.5%). Differences in the ADC, FA, and VA values were observed. The results of Cox regression survival analysis for all the patients included in the survival analysis revealed that DTI metrics contributed to the prediction of overall survival (OS) in the emerging models (p < 0.05). Both FA and VA were associated with OS (p = 0.037 and p = 0.038, respectively). However, ADC was not associated with OS (p = 0.177) or DFS (p = 0.252).

Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the prognostic value of DTI-MRI in breast cancer with statistical survival analysis techniques. We believe that DTI measurements can be used as a biomarker for OS analysis in breast cancer given the available data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弥散张量成像:乳腺癌患者生存分析预测。
目的:我们旨在探讨弥散张量成像(DTI)和表观弥散系数(ADC)参数在评估浸润性乳腺癌患者无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)中的表现:共纳入2017年至2022年期间确诊的49名浸润性乳腺癌女性患者。所有患者均接受了具有 DTI 和弥散加权成像(DWI)特征的乳腺磁共振成像(MRI)检查,检查人员对临床数据进行了盲法处理。通过测量体积各向异性(VA)、分数各向异性(FA)和 ADC 值来评估瘤内测量的异质性。根据病例的OS和DFS状态分析了弥散指标的相关性和差异。通过接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)分析评估了定量结果的鉴别能力,并在独立队列中进行了验证:我们对有转移灶的患者(13 人,占 36.5%)和无转移灶的患者(36 人,占 73.5%)进行了评估。观察到 ADC、FA 和 VA 值存在差异。对所有纳入生存分析的患者进行的 Cox 回归生存分析结果显示,在新兴模型中,DTI 指标有助于预测患者的总生存期(OS)(P 结论:"DTI 指标有助于预测患者的总生存期(OS)":据我们所知,这是第一项利用统计生存分析技术评估 DTI-MRI 对乳腺癌预后价值的研究。我们认为,根据现有数据,DTI 测量可用作乳腺癌 OS 分析的生物标记物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[New innovations in cross-sectional imaging diagnostics of the aorta]. Mitteilungen des Berufsverbandes der Deutschen Radiologie. [Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the breast : What can we expect from the future?] [Importance of parametric and molecular imaging for therapeutic management of breast cancer]. [Parametric imaging in breast diagnostics : Computed tomography].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1