Rescreening on RBANS Delayed Memory Index? Forget About It!

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1097/WAD.0000000000000606
Marwan N Sabbagh, Wojciech Michalak, Charlotte Thim Hansen, Christian Ahmad Wichmann, Alice Clark
{"title":"Rescreening on RBANS Delayed Memory Index? Forget About It!","authors":"Marwan N Sabbagh, Wojciech Michalak, Charlotte Thim Hansen, Christian Ahmad Wichmann, Alice Clark","doi":"10.1097/WAD.0000000000000606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the value of rescreening patients with Alzheimer's disease who do not meet the inclusion criteria for the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Delayed Memory Index (RBANS DMI) at the initial assessment.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Participants (aged 50-85 years, without dementia, Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥22, valid Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] global score, and amyloid status at baseline) were identified in the European Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia database. Changes from baseline in RBANS DMI were estimated using a mixed model for repeated measurements. Logistic regressions were used to estimate the probability of participants with baseline RBANS DMI 86-95 having RBANS DMI ≤85, CDR global score ≥0.5, and amyloid positivity at 6 and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was significant variability in the change in RBANS DMI scores over time (median change at 6 months: 2.0). An estimated 15% of participants with RBANS DMI 86-95 at baseline progressed to ≤85 at 6 months; 8% also achieved CDR global score ≥0.5 and 5% were also amyloid positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results from our analysis indicate that there is limited value in rescreening patients based on their initial RBANS DMI score.</p>","PeriodicalId":7679,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000606","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the value of rescreening patients with Alzheimer's disease who do not meet the inclusion criteria for the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Delayed Memory Index (RBANS DMI) at the initial assessment.

Patients and methods: Participants (aged 50-85 years, without dementia, Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥22, valid Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] global score, and amyloid status at baseline) were identified in the European Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia database. Changes from baseline in RBANS DMI were estimated using a mixed model for repeated measurements. Logistic regressions were used to estimate the probability of participants with baseline RBANS DMI 86-95 having RBANS DMI ≤85, CDR global score ≥0.5, and amyloid positivity at 6 and 12 months.

Results: There was significant variability in the change in RBANS DMI scores over time (median change at 6 months: 2.0). An estimated 15% of participants with RBANS DMI 86-95 at baseline progressed to ≤85 at 6 months; 8% also achieved CDR global score ≥0.5 and 5% were also amyloid positive.

Conclusions: The results from our analysis indicate that there is limited value in rescreening patients based on their initial RBANS DMI score.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新评估 RBANS 延迟记忆指数?算了吧
目的评估对初次评估时不符合神经心理状态评估可重复性电池延迟记忆指数(RBANS DMI)纳入标准的阿尔茨海默病患者进行再筛查的价值:从欧洲阿尔茨海默氏症预防数据库中确定参与者(年龄 50-85 岁,无痴呆症,迷你精神状态检查得分≥22 分,有效的临床痴呆评级 [CDR] 总分,基线时淀粉样蛋白状态)。采用重复测量混合模型估算 RBANS DMI 与基线相比的变化。使用逻辑回归估计基线RBANS DMI为86-95的参与者在6个月和12个月时RBANS DMI≤85、CDR总分≥0.5以及淀粉样蛋白阳性的概率:随着时间的推移,RBANS DMI评分的变化存在很大差异(6个月时的中位变化:2.0)。基线时 RBANS DMI 为 86-95 分的参与者中,估计有 15%的人在 6 个月时病情发展到了≤85 分;有 8%的人的 CDR 总分也达到了≥0.5 分,还有 5%的人淀粉样蛋白呈阳性:我们的分析结果表明,根据患者最初的 RBANS DMI 评分对其进行再筛查的价值有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: ​Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of clinicians and researchers, with primary emphasis on Alzheimer disease and associated disorders. The journal publishes original articles emphasizing research in humans including epidemiologic studies, clinical trials and experimental studies, studies of diagnosis and biomarkers, as well as research on the health of persons with dementia and their caregivers. The scientific portion of the journal is augmented by reviews of the current literature, concepts, conjectures, and hypotheses in dementia, brief reports, and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
The Difference in Cognitive Profiles Between Patients With Alzheimer Dementia With and Without Psychosis: A Rapid Review. Mapping the Landscape of Those Left Behind When a Person With Dementia Dies: Roles of Race and Ethnicity. DXA-Measured Abdominal Adipose Depots and Structural Brain Integrity in Postmenopausal Women. Association of Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity With Cognitive Performance: Evidence From Brazil. Incidence of Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias in Iran From 2010 to 2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1