Cochlear implant referral patterns in the UK suggest a postcode lottery with inequitable access for older adults; results of a pilot audit in five Audiology sites.
Helen Cullington, Ann-Marie Dickinson, Unai Martinez de Estibariz, Joseph Blackaby, Lisa Kennedy, Katie McNeill, Sara O'Neill
{"title":"Cochlear implant referral patterns in the UK suggest a postcode lottery with inequitable access for older adults; results of a pilot audit in five Audiology sites.","authors":"Helen Cullington, Ann-Marie Dickinson, Unai Martinez de Estibariz, Joseph Blackaby, Lisa Kennedy, Katie McNeill, Sara O'Neill","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2023.2298751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To use a standardised reporting tool to identify potential eligible candidates for cochlear implant (CI) referral and quantify the proportion of adults who had a CI referral discussion after presenting with an audiogram within United Kingdom (UK) audiometric criteria.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective multicentre 6-month audit of Audiology clinic databases.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>A total of 810 adults from five geographically diverse UK Audiology sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected in late 2019 after UK CI audiometric candidacy criteria changed; one site collected only 3 months of data. The proportion of potential eligible adults (based only on audiometry) considered for CI referral was 64% (521 out of 810) and varied by site (from 50% to 83%). About 24% of patients (123 out of 521) declined CI referral; this also varied across sites (12-45%). The median age of patients where CI referral was not considered was 80 years - significantly higher than the group where CI referral was considered (73 years).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CI referral is dependent on where adults live, and how old they are. Older adults are significantly less likely to be considered for CI referral by Audiologists. Audiology clinics need more support to empower staff to talk to patients about CI referral.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"853-858"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2023.2298751","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To use a standardised reporting tool to identify potential eligible candidates for cochlear implant (CI) referral and quantify the proportion of adults who had a CI referral discussion after presenting with an audiogram within United Kingdom (UK) audiometric criteria.
Design: Retrospective multicentre 6-month audit of Audiology clinic databases.
Study sample: A total of 810 adults from five geographically diverse UK Audiology sites.
Results: Data were collected in late 2019 after UK CI audiometric candidacy criteria changed; one site collected only 3 months of data. The proportion of potential eligible adults (based only on audiometry) considered for CI referral was 64% (521 out of 810) and varied by site (from 50% to 83%). About 24% of patients (123 out of 521) declined CI referral; this also varied across sites (12-45%). The median age of patients where CI referral was not considered was 80 years - significantly higher than the group where CI referral was considered (73 years).
Conclusions: CI referral is dependent on where adults live, and how old they are. Older adults are significantly less likely to be considered for CI referral by Audiologists. Audiology clinics need more support to empower staff to talk to patients about CI referral.
目的:使用标准化报告工具确定潜在的符合人工耳蜗转诊条件的患者,并量化在听力图符合英国标准后进行人工耳蜗转诊讨论的成人比例:使用标准化报告工具确定潜在的符合人工耳蜗植入(CI)转诊条件的候选人,并量化在听力图符合英国(UK)听力标准后进行 CI 转诊讨论的成人比例:研究样本:研究样本:来自英国五个地理位置不同的听力学诊所的共810名成年人:数据收集于英国 CI 听力测量候选标准改变后的 2019 年底;其中一个站点仅收集了 3 个月的数据。被考虑转诊为 CI 的潜在合格成人比例为 64%(810 人中有 521 人)(仅基于测听结果),各医疗点的比例有所不同(从 50% 到 83%)。约 24% 的患者(521 人中有 123 人)拒绝接受 CI 转诊;这一比例在不同地区也存在差异(12%-45%)。未考虑转诊 CI 的患者年龄中位数为 80 岁,明显高于考虑转诊 CI 的患者(73 岁):CI转诊取决于成年人的居住地和年龄。听力学家考虑转诊 CI 的老年人明显较少。听力诊所需要更多支持,以增强员工与患者讨论 CI 转诊的能力。
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.