Assessment of Erythrocyte Osmotic Fragility and Its Determinants, and Comparison of Hematological Indices Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients on Follow-Up at Jimma Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia.

IF 2.1 Q3 HEMATOLOGY Journal of Blood Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JBM.S445620
Zenebe Tujara, Wondu Reta, Eyasu Tadesse, Ifa Dereje, Mekonnen Tesfa
{"title":"Assessment of Erythrocyte Osmotic Fragility and Its Determinants, and Comparison of Hematological Indices Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients on Follow-Up at Jimma Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia.","authors":"Zenebe Tujara, Wondu Reta, Eyasu Tadesse, Ifa Dereje, Mekonnen Tesfa","doi":"10.2147/JBM.S445620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is one of the most prevalent non-communicable diseases worldwide. Approximately 9.3% of the general population was estimated to have DM globally in 2019. Erythrocyte osmotic fragility (EOF) in hyperglycemic patients is expected to increase and determine the rate of erythrocyte hemolysis.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess erythrocyte osmotic fragility (EOF) and its determinants and to compare hematological indices among T2DM patients on follow-up at the Jimma Medical Center (JMC), Jimma, Southwest Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A facility-based cross-sectional study involving 124 participants (each 62) of T2DM patients and controls was conducted from October to November 2020 using a structured questionnaire. 5 mL of venous blood was drawn to assess OF, complete blood count, and blood glucose levels. EOF was investigated using a series hypotonic solution of NaCl. The supernatant of the centrifuged sample was transferred to cuvette test tubes, and the hemolysis stage was read on a spectrophotometer. The collected data were coded and entered into Epi-data Version 3.1. The analysis was performed using SPSS Version 23.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with non-diabetic controls, patients with T2DM had significantly increased EOF. FBG >126mg/dl (AOR=7.741, 95% CI: 1.562-38.360), PPBG >200 mg/dl (AOR=7.576, 95% CI: 1.519-37.791), RDW (AOR=4.558, 95% CI: 1.136-18.284) were significantly associated with abnormal EOF. A statistically significant increase in total white blood cells and absolute neutrophil counts (P < 0.001) were observed in T2DM patients. From RBC indices, red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) were significantly increased in T2DM patients (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that EOF was greater in patients with T2DM than in non-diabetic controls and was determined by FBG, PPBG, and RDW. The study also demonstrated that hematological index alterations were higher in T2DM subjects than in non-diabetic controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":15166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Blood Medicine","volume":"15 ","pages":"9-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10812138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Blood Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S445620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is one of the most prevalent non-communicable diseases worldwide. Approximately 9.3% of the general population was estimated to have DM globally in 2019. Erythrocyte osmotic fragility (EOF) in hyperglycemic patients is expected to increase and determine the rate of erythrocyte hemolysis.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess erythrocyte osmotic fragility (EOF) and its determinants and to compare hematological indices among T2DM patients on follow-up at the Jimma Medical Center (JMC), Jimma, Southwest Ethiopia.

Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study involving 124 participants (each 62) of T2DM patients and controls was conducted from October to November 2020 using a structured questionnaire. 5 mL of venous blood was drawn to assess OF, complete blood count, and blood glucose levels. EOF was investigated using a series hypotonic solution of NaCl. The supernatant of the centrifuged sample was transferred to cuvette test tubes, and the hemolysis stage was read on a spectrophotometer. The collected data were coded and entered into Epi-data Version 3.1. The analysis was performed using SPSS Version 23.

Results: Compared with non-diabetic controls, patients with T2DM had significantly increased EOF. FBG >126mg/dl (AOR=7.741, 95% CI: 1.562-38.360), PPBG >200 mg/dl (AOR=7.576, 95% CI: 1.519-37.791), RDW (AOR=4.558, 95% CI: 1.136-18.284) were significantly associated with abnormal EOF. A statistically significant increase in total white blood cells and absolute neutrophil counts (P < 0.001) were observed in T2DM patients. From RBC indices, red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) were significantly increased in T2DM patients (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: This study suggests that EOF was greater in patients with T2DM than in non-diabetic controls and was determined by FBG, PPBG, and RDW. The study also demonstrated that hematological index alterations were higher in T2DM subjects than in non-diabetic controls.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚西南部吉马医疗中心随访的 2 型糖尿病患者红细胞渗透脆性及其决定因素的评估以及血液指标的比较。
背景:糖尿病(DM)是全球最普遍的非传染性疾病之一。据估计,2019 年全球约有 9.3% 的普通人群患有糖尿病。目的:本研究旨在评估红细胞渗透脆性(EOF)及其决定因素,并比较埃塞俄比亚西南部吉马市吉马医疗中心(JMC)随访的T2DM患者的血液学指标:2020 年 10 月至 11 月,采用结构化问卷调查法对 124 名 T2DM 患者和对照组参与者(每组 62 人)进行了一项以医疗机构为基础的横断面研究。抽取 5 mL 静脉血以评估 OF、全血细胞计数和血糖水平。使用一系列低渗的氯化钠溶液调查 EOF。离心样本的上清液转移到比色皿试管中,在分光光度计上读取溶血阶段。收集的数据经编码后输入 Epi-data 3.1 版。使用 SPSS 23.0 版进行分析:与非糖尿病对照组相比,T2DM 患者的 EOF 明显增加。FBG >126mg/dl (AOR=7.741, 95% CI: 1.562-38.360)、PPBG >200 mg/dl (AOR=7.576, 95% CI: 1.519-37.791)、RDW (AOR=4.558, 95% CI: 1.136-18.284)与EOF异常明显相关。据统计,T2DM 患者的白细胞总数和中性粒细胞绝对数明显增加(P < 0.001)。从红细胞指数来看,T2DM 患者的红细胞分布宽度(RDW)和平均血球容积(MCV)明显增加(P < 0.001):本研究表明,与非糖尿病对照组相比,T2DM 患者的 EOF 值更高,并由 FBG、PPBG 和 RDW 决定。研究还表明,T2DM 患者的血液指标变化高于非糖尿病对照组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Blood Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal publishing laboratory, experimental and clinical aspects of all topics pertaining to blood based medicine including but not limited to: Transfusion Medicine (blood components, stem cell transplantation, apheresis, gene based therapeutics), Blood collection, Donor issues, Transmittable diseases, and Blood banking logistics, Immunohematology, Artificial and alternative blood based therapeutics, Hematology including disorders/pathology related to leukocytes/immunology, red cells, platelets and hemostasis, Biotechnology/nanotechnology of blood related medicine, Legal aspects of blood medicine, Historical perspectives. Original research, short reports, reviews, case reports and commentaries are invited.
期刊最新文献
Use and Effectiveness of Carboximaltose Iron in Preoperative Anemia Treatment: A Multicenter and Retrospective Study. Paving the Road for Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in the United Arab Emirates: A Single Centre's Experience. Evaluation of IgG and Complement Component C4 Levels in Low-Income Countries, Yemen Republic in Light of Their Proposed Role in the Hemolysis of Stored CPDA-1 Whole Blood. A Dosimetric Comparison Study for Blood Irradiation Employing Different Medium and Algorithms in Clinical Linear Accelerator. Newer Modalities and Updates in the Management of Sickle Cell Disease: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1