Living in an Intimate Partner Violence Shelter During a Pandemic: Perspectives from Advocates and Survivors.

IF 1.4 Journal of evidence-based social work (2019) Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-29 DOI:10.1080/26408066.2024.2308828
Sarah Leat, Kristen E Ravi, Caterina Obenauf
{"title":"Living in an Intimate Partner Violence Shelter During a Pandemic: Perspectives from Advocates and Survivors.","authors":"Sarah Leat, Kristen E Ravi, Caterina Obenauf","doi":"10.1080/26408066.2024.2308828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With state-wide quarantine policies during the COVID-19 pandemic like those implemented in the state of Texas, intimate partner violence (IPV) shelter staff were forced to incorporate new safety measures to keep survivors and advocates safe. To understand the impact of these adaptations fully, authors interviewed shelter staff and residents to capture both of their experiences living and working in the same shelter during the height of the coronavirus pandemic (summer 2020) to understand how changes in policy and procedure in shelters impacted survivors and advocates.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A qualitative phenomenological design was utilized to collect and analyze data from 10 staff and 10 survivors to develop both a textual and a structural description of participant experiences living in an IPV shelter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The current study captured the survivors' and advocates' perspectives related to the 1) vacillating views of shelter social distancing and quarantine policies, 2) shelter occupancy and staffing unpredictability, 3) the broader challenges related to environmental stressors and 4) mobility challenges.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results of this study highlight factors related to interpersonal relationships within the shelter and structural factors of shelter which contributed to stress for participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The coronavirus is continuing to present challenges for shelters. Implications can be drawn from provider and client experiences that can inform policies and procedures for future health crises, including the need to mitigate environmental stress and transportation challenges, as well as considerations for maintaining social support should social distancing be necessary in future epidemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":73742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","volume":" ","pages":"435-454"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2024.2308828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: With state-wide quarantine policies during the COVID-19 pandemic like those implemented in the state of Texas, intimate partner violence (IPV) shelter staff were forced to incorporate new safety measures to keep survivors and advocates safe. To understand the impact of these adaptations fully, authors interviewed shelter staff and residents to capture both of their experiences living and working in the same shelter during the height of the coronavirus pandemic (summer 2020) to understand how changes in policy and procedure in shelters impacted survivors and advocates.

Materials and methods: A qualitative phenomenological design was utilized to collect and analyze data from 10 staff and 10 survivors to develop both a textual and a structural description of participant experiences living in an IPV shelter.

Results: The current study captured the survivors' and advocates' perspectives related to the 1) vacillating views of shelter social distancing and quarantine policies, 2) shelter occupancy and staffing unpredictability, 3) the broader challenges related to environmental stressors and 4) mobility challenges.

Discussion: Results of this study highlight factors related to interpersonal relationships within the shelter and structural factors of shelter which contributed to stress for participants.

Conclusion: The coronavirus is continuing to present challenges for shelters. Implications can be drawn from provider and client experiences that can inform policies and procedures for future health crises, including the need to mitigate environmental stress and transportation challenges, as well as considerations for maintaining social support should social distancing be necessary in future epidemics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大流行病期间在亲密伴侣暴力庇护所的生活:倡导者和幸存者的观点。
目的:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,德克萨斯州实施了全州范围的隔离政策,亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 庇护所的工作人员不得不采取新的安全措施来保证幸存者和倡导者的安全。为了充分了解这些调整措施的影响,作者采访了庇护所的工作人员和居民,以记录冠状病毒大流行期间(2020 年夏季)他们在同一庇护所的生活和工作经历,从而了解庇护所政策和程序的变化如何影响幸存者和倡导者:采用定性现象学设计,收集并分析来自 10 名工作人员和 10 名幸存者的数据,对参与者在 IPV 庇护所的生活经历进行文字和结构描述:本研究捕捉到了幸存者和倡导者对以下问题的看法:1)对庇护所社会隔离和检疫政策的看法摇摆不定;2)庇护所入住率和人员配置的不可预测性;3)与环境压力相关的更广泛挑战;4)流动性挑战:讨论:本研究的结果强调了与避难所内人际关系有关的因素和避难所的结构性因素,这些因素都是造成参与者压力的原因:结论:冠状病毒继续给避难所带来挑战。从提供者和客户的经验中可以得出一些启示,为未来的健康危机提供政策和程序方面的信息,包括减轻环境压力和交通挑战的必要性,以及在未来流行病肆虐时,如果有必要保持社会距离,维持社会支持的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patient and providers' perspectives on the unmet needs and considerations for participation in a mind-body program for Spanish-speaking adults with chronic pain. A Statewide Cluster Randomized Trial to Test the Impact of the Ohio Kinship and Adoption Navigator (OhioKAN) Program on Caregiver and Child Outcomes. Social Work Responses to Loneliness and Social Isolation Among Older Adults: Knowledge, Competences and Challenges. Risk and Protective Factors Associated with Opiate Misuse Among Young Adults with a History of Serious Violent Offending. Generative Artificial Intelligence Use Among Social Work Students: The Role of Perceived Utility and Knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1