Maternal and Neonatal Morbidities by Race in College-Educated Women.

IF 0.8 Q4 PEDIATRICS AJP Reports Pub Date : 2024-01-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1778000
Adina R Kern-Goldberger, Nigel Madden, Caitlin Baptiste, Alexander Friedman, Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman
{"title":"Maternal and Neonatal Morbidities by Race in College-Educated Women.","authors":"Adina R Kern-Goldberger, Nigel Madden, Caitlin Baptiste, Alexander Friedman, Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1778000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  Non-Hispanic black and Hispanic women experience significantly higher adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes compared with non-Hispanic white women. The purpose of this study is to explore whether disparities in obstetric outcomes exist by race among women who are college-educated. <b>Study Design</b>  This is a retrospective cohort study from a multicenter observational cohort of women undergoing cesarean delivery. Women were defined as \"college-educated\" if they reported completion of a 4-year college degree. Race/ethnicity was categorized as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, or unknown. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal morbidity, and a composite of neonatal morbidity was evaluated as a secondary outcome. A multivariable logistic regression model was then utilized to assess associations of race with the primary and secondary outcomes. <b>Results</b>  A total of 2,540 women were included in the study. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, maternal morbidity was found to be significantly higher for college-educated non-Hispanic black women compared with non-Hispanic white women (odds ratio [OR] 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-2.80). The incidence of neonatal morbidity was significantly higher for non-Hispanic black (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.31-2.79) and Hispanic (OR 3.34, 95% CI 2.23-5.01) women. <b>Conclusion</b>  In this cohort, the odds of cesarean-related maternal and neonatal morbidities were significantly higher for college-educated non-Hispanic black women, compared with their non-Hispanic white counterparts. This demonstrates that even among women with higher level education, racial and ethnic disparities persist in obstetric outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7645,"journal":{"name":"AJP Reports","volume":"14 1","pages":"e57-e61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10824592/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJP Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1778000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective  Non-Hispanic black and Hispanic women experience significantly higher adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes compared with non-Hispanic white women. The purpose of this study is to explore whether disparities in obstetric outcomes exist by race among women who are college-educated. Study Design  This is a retrospective cohort study from a multicenter observational cohort of women undergoing cesarean delivery. Women were defined as "college-educated" if they reported completion of a 4-year college degree. Race/ethnicity was categorized as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, or unknown. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal morbidity, and a composite of neonatal morbidity was evaluated as a secondary outcome. A multivariable logistic regression model was then utilized to assess associations of race with the primary and secondary outcomes. Results  A total of 2,540 women were included in the study. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, maternal morbidity was found to be significantly higher for college-educated non-Hispanic black women compared with non-Hispanic white women (odds ratio [OR] 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-2.80). The incidence of neonatal morbidity was significantly higher for non-Hispanic black (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.31-2.79) and Hispanic (OR 3.34, 95% CI 2.23-5.01) women. Conclusion  In this cohort, the odds of cesarean-related maternal and neonatal morbidities were significantly higher for college-educated non-Hispanic black women, compared with their non-Hispanic white counterparts. This demonstrates that even among women with higher level education, racial and ethnic disparities persist in obstetric outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
按种族分列的受过大学教育妇女的产妇和新生儿发病率。
目标 与非西班牙裔白人妇女相比,非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔妇女的产妇和新生儿不良预后明显更高。本研究旨在探讨受过大学教育的女性在产科结果方面是否存在种族差异。研究设计 这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是接受剖宫产的多中心观察队列妇女。如果产妇报告已获得 4 年制大学学位,则将其定义为 "受过大学教育"。种族/人种分为非西班牙裔白人、非西班牙裔黑人、西班牙裔、亚裔、美国原住民或未知。主要结果是产妇的综合发病率,次要结果是新生儿的综合发病率。然后利用多变量逻辑回归模型评估种族与主要和次要结果之间的关联。结果 共有2540名妇女参与了研究。在对潜在的混杂变量进行调整后,发现受过大学教育的非西班牙裔黑人产妇的发病率明显高于非西班牙裔白人产妇(几率比 [OR] 1.77,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.12-2.80)。非西班牙裔黑人妇女(OR 1.91,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.31-2.79)和西班牙裔妇女(OR 3.34,95% 置信区间 [CI] 2.23-5.01)的新生儿发病率明显更高。结论 在该队列中,与非西班牙裔白人妇女相比,受过大学教育的非西班牙裔黑人妇女发生与剖宫产相关的孕产妇和新生儿疾病的几率明显更高。这表明,即使是受过高等教育的妇女,在产科结果方面仍然存在种族和民族差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJP Reports
AJP Reports PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Human Milk-Derived Fortifier to Reduce Hospital-Acquired Malnutrition in Uncomplicated Gastroschisis: A Case Report. Corrigendum: The Collection and Application of Autologous Amniotic Fluid to Cesarean Delivery Closure. Cardiac Dysfunction Associated with Lacosamide in a Premature Infant with Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy: A Case Report. Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome in a 10-Month-Old Ex-Preterm Infant with Delirium. Hemorrhaging Uterine Fibroid Leading to Emergent Early Term Cesarean Delivery: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1