Incidence and Outcomes of New-Onset Right Bundle Branch Block Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-30 DOI:10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012377
Nicholas Y Tan, Demilade Adedinsewo, Abdallah El Sabbagh, Ahmed F Sayed Ahmed, Andrea Carolina Morales-Lara, Mikolaj Wieczorek, Malini Madhavan, Siva K Mulpuru, Abhishek J Deshmukh, Samuel J Asirvatham, Mackram F Eleid, Paul A Friedman, Yong-Mei Cha, Ammar M Killu
{"title":"Incidence and Outcomes of New-Onset Right Bundle Branch Block Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.","authors":"Nicholas Y Tan, Demilade Adedinsewo, Abdallah El Sabbagh, Ahmed F Sayed Ahmed, Andrea Carolina Morales-Lara, Mikolaj Wieczorek, Malini Madhavan, Siva K Mulpuru, Abhishek J Deshmukh, Samuel J Asirvatham, Mackram F Eleid, Paul A Friedman, Yong-Mei Cha, Ammar M Killu","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence and prognosis of right bundle branch block (RBBB) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are unknown. Hence, we sought to characterize the incidence of post-TAVR RBBB and determine associated risks of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients 18 years and above without preexisting RBBB or PPM who underwent TAVR at US Mayo Clinic sites and Mayo Clinic Health Systems from June 2010 to May 2021 were evaluated. Post-TAVR RBBB was defined as new-onset RBBB in the postimplantation period. The risks of PPM implantation (within 90 days) and mortality following TAVR were compared for patients with and without post-TAVR RBBB using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling. The risks of PPM implantation (within 90 days) and mortality following TAVR were compared for patients with and without post-TAVR RBBB using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1992 patients, 15 (0.75%) experienced new RBBB post-TAVR. There was a higher degree of valve oversizing among patients with new RBBB post-TAVR versus those without (17.9% versus 10.0%; <i>P</i>=0.034). Ten patients (66.7%) with post-TAVR RBBB experienced high-grade atrioventricular block and underwent PPM implantation (median 1 day; Q1, 0.2 and Q3, 4), compared with 268/1977 (13.6%) without RBBB. Following propensity score adjustment for covariates (age, sex, balloon-expandable valve, annulus diameter, and valve oversizing), post-TAVR RBBB was significantly associated with PPM implantation (hazard ratio, 8.36 [95% CI, 4.19-16.7]; <i>P</i><0.001). No statistically significant increase in mortality was seen with post-TAVR RBBB (hazard ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.33-2.11]; <i>P</i>=0.69), adjusting for age and sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although infrequent, post-TAVR RBBB was associated with elevated PPM implantation risk. The mechanisms for its development and its clinical prognosis require further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":10319,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"e012377"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012377","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The incidence and prognosis of right bundle branch block (RBBB) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are unknown. Hence, we sought to characterize the incidence of post-TAVR RBBB and determine associated risks of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation and mortality.

Methods: All patients 18 years and above without preexisting RBBB or PPM who underwent TAVR at US Mayo Clinic sites and Mayo Clinic Health Systems from June 2010 to May 2021 were evaluated. Post-TAVR RBBB was defined as new-onset RBBB in the postimplantation period. The risks of PPM implantation (within 90 days) and mortality following TAVR were compared for patients with and without post-TAVR RBBB using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling. The risks of PPM implantation (within 90 days) and mortality following TAVR were compared for patients with and without post-TAVR RBBB using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Results: Of 1992 patients, 15 (0.75%) experienced new RBBB post-TAVR. There was a higher degree of valve oversizing among patients with new RBBB post-TAVR versus those without (17.9% versus 10.0%; P=0.034). Ten patients (66.7%) with post-TAVR RBBB experienced high-grade atrioventricular block and underwent PPM implantation (median 1 day; Q1, 0.2 and Q3, 4), compared with 268/1977 (13.6%) without RBBB. Following propensity score adjustment for covariates (age, sex, balloon-expandable valve, annulus diameter, and valve oversizing), post-TAVR RBBB was significantly associated with PPM implantation (hazard ratio, 8.36 [95% CI, 4.19-16.7]; P<0.001). No statistically significant increase in mortality was seen with post-TAVR RBBB (hazard ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.33-2.11]; P=0.69), adjusting for age and sex.

Conclusions: Although infrequent, post-TAVR RBBB was associated with elevated PPM implantation risk. The mechanisms for its development and its clinical prognosis require further study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发右束支传导阻滞的发生率和预后。
背景:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)的发生率和预后尚不清楚。因此,我们试图描述经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 RBBB 的发生率,并确定永久起搏器(PPM)植入和死亡率的相关风险:方法: 我们对 2010 年 6 月至 2021 年 5 月期间在美国梅奥诊所和梅奥诊所医疗系统接受 TAVR 的所有 18 岁及以上无 RBBB 或 PPM 的患者进行了评估。TAVR后RBBB定义为植入术后新发的RBBB。采用 Kaplan-Meier 分析和 Cox 比例危险模型比较了有和没有 TAVR 后 RBBB 的患者在 TAVR 后的 PPM 植入风险(90 天内)和死亡率。TAVR后RBBB定义为植入后新发的RBBB。使用Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox比例危险模型比较了有TAVR后RBBB和没有TAVR后RBBB患者的PPM植入风险(90天内)和TAVR后死亡率:1992名患者中,15人(0.75%)在TAVR后出现新的RBBB。TAVR术后出现新RBBB的患者与未出现新RBBB的患者相比,瓣膜过大的比例更高(17.9%对10.0%;P=0.034)。TAVR后RBBB患者中有10人(66.7%)出现高级别房室传导阻滞并接受了PPM植入术(中位数为1天;第一季度为0.2天,第三季度为4天),而无RBBB的患者有268/1977人(13.6%)。在对协变量(年龄、性别、球囊扩张瓣膜、瓣环直径和瓣膜过大)进行倾向评分调整后,TAVR后RBBB与PPM植入显著相关(危险比为8.36 [95% CI, 4.19-16.7];PP=0.69),调整了年龄和性别:TAVR后RBBB虽然不常见,但与PPM植入风险升高有关。结论:TAVR术后RBBB虽然不常见,但与PPM植入风险升高有关,其发生机制和临床预后需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology is a journal dedicated to the study and application of clinical cardiac electrophysiology. It covers a wide range of topics including the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, as well as research in this field. The journal accepts various types of studies, including observational research, clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and advancements in translational research.
期刊最新文献
Exercise Training Improves Cognitive Function and Neurovascular Control: A Secondary Analysis of the Exercise Training in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Permanent Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Resuscitated Sudden Cardiac Arrest as the Initial Presentation of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Impact of Being Underweight on the Safety and Efficacy of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: An Analysis From the Japanese Catheter Ablation Registry. Multicenter Hemodynamic Assessment of the LOT-CRT Strategy: When Does Combining Left Bundle Branch Pacing and Coronary Venous Pacing Enhance Resynchronization?: Primary Results of the CSPOT Study. Performance of Atrial Fibrillation Burden Trends for Stroke Risk Stratification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1