Monoclonal Antibody Infusions for Outpatient Management of Mild-Moderate COVID-19.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Annals of Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-30 DOI:10.1177/10600280231222465
Hannah B Knox, Lisa A Dykes, Lancer A Scott, Bradley C Presley, Lara C Lambert
{"title":"Monoclonal Antibody Infusions for Outpatient Management of Mild-Moderate COVID-19.","authors":"Hannah B Knox, Lisa A Dykes, Lancer A Scott, Bradley C Presley, Lara C Lambert","doi":"10.1177/10600280231222465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a rapid, exponential increase in hospitalizations and morbidity/mortality. In November 2020, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) permitting administration of the first monoclonal antibodies (mAb) for outpatient treatment of COVID-19. Early data showed a reduction in COVID-19-related hospitalizations with few adverse events. However, since these treatments are only authorized under an EUA, real-world data are minimal.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess efficacy and safety of mAbs in a veteran population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed veterans at the Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Health Care System with mild-moderate COVID-19 and screened for mAb eligibility between December 1, 2020, and October 31, 2021. The primary outcome was hospitalizations and/or emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and post-COVID-19 conditions. Adverse events were also evaluated. Outcomes were compared between mAb-treated patients and eligible veterans who were not treated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 296 and 275 veterans in the mAb and control groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found for the primary outcome overall (25.7% vs 25.1%; <i>P</i> = 0.87), nor for COVID-19-related return visits or hospitalizations (13.9% v. 16%; <i>P</i> = 0.4). However, the mAb group had more return ED visits (<i>P</i> = 0.35), and the control group had significantly more hospitalizations (<i>P</i> = 0.02). Vaccinated veterans who received an mAb had fewer return visits and hospitalizations (<i>P</i> = 0.01). More mAb-treated veterans experienced post-COVID-19 conditions. No difference in mortality was found. Four nonsevere adverse events occurred after the mAb therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Overall, the mAbs appeared safe and effective. Sicker, higher-risk mAb-treated veterans faired similarly to less-sick, high-risk veterans not treated. Those who were vaccinated seemed to benefit the most from mAb therapy. Future prospective studies with more matched groups are needed to assess full benefits and risks of mAbs shown to neutralize the predominant variants.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"985-993"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280231222465","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a rapid, exponential increase in hospitalizations and morbidity/mortality. In November 2020, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) permitting administration of the first monoclonal antibodies (mAb) for outpatient treatment of COVID-19. Early data showed a reduction in COVID-19-related hospitalizations with few adverse events. However, since these treatments are only authorized under an EUA, real-world data are minimal.

Objective: To assess efficacy and safety of mAbs in a veteran population.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed veterans at the Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Health Care System with mild-moderate COVID-19 and screened for mAb eligibility between December 1, 2020, and October 31, 2021. The primary outcome was hospitalizations and/or emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and post-COVID-19 conditions. Adverse events were also evaluated. Outcomes were compared between mAb-treated patients and eligible veterans who were not treated.

Results: There were 296 and 275 veterans in the mAb and control groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found for the primary outcome overall (25.7% vs 25.1%; P = 0.87), nor for COVID-19-related return visits or hospitalizations (13.9% v. 16%; P = 0.4). However, the mAb group had more return ED visits (P = 0.35), and the control group had significantly more hospitalizations (P = 0.02). Vaccinated veterans who received an mAb had fewer return visits and hospitalizations (P = 0.01). More mAb-treated veterans experienced post-COVID-19 conditions. No difference in mortality was found. Four nonsevere adverse events occurred after the mAb therapy.

Conclusion and relevance: Overall, the mAbs appeared safe and effective. Sicker, higher-risk mAb-treated veterans faired similarly to less-sick, high-risk veterans not treated. Those who were vaccinated seemed to benefit the most from mAb therapy. Future prospective studies with more matched groups are needed to assess full benefits and risks of mAbs shown to neutralize the predominant variants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单克隆抗体输注用于门诊治疗轻度-中度 COVID-19。
背景:COVID-19 大流行导致住院人数和发病率/死亡率呈指数级快速增长。2020 年 11 月,美国食品和药物管理局 (FDA) 发布了紧急使用授权 (EUA),允许使用首批单克隆抗体 (mAb),用于 COVID-19 的门诊治疗。早期数据显示,与 COVID-19 相关的住院人数有所减少,不良反应也很少。然而,由于这些治疗仅获得欧盟授权,实际数据极少:目的:评估 mAbs 在退伍军人群体中的疗效和安全性:这项回顾性研究分析了拉尔夫-约翰逊退伍军人事务医疗保健系统(Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Health Care System)中患有轻中度 COVID-19 并在 2020 年 12 月 1 日至 2021 年 10 月 31 日期间通过 mAb 资格筛选的退伍军人。主要结果是 30 天内的住院和/或急诊就诊。次要结果包括 30 天死亡率和 COVID-19 后的情况。此外,还对不良事件进行了评估。对接受过 mAb 治疗的患者和未接受治疗的合格退伍军人的结果进行了比较:mAb 组和对照组分别有 296 名和 275 名退伍军人。主要结果的总体差异(25.7% 对 25.1%;P = 0.87)和 COVID-19 相关的复诊或住院差异(13.9% 对 16%;P = 0.4)均无统计学意义。然而,mAb组的急诊室复诊率更高(P = 0.35),对照组的住院率明显更高(P = 0.02)。接种过 mAb 的退伍军人复诊和住院次数较少(P = 0.01)。更多接受过 mAb 治疗的退伍军人出现了 COVID-19 后遗症。死亡率方面没有发现差异。mAb治疗后发生了4起非严重不良事件:总体而言,mAb 看起来安全有效。接受过 mAb 治疗的病情较重、风险较高的退伍军人与未接受治疗的病情较轻、风险较高的退伍军人的情况相似。接种过疫苗的退伍军人似乎从 mAb 治疗中获益最多。未来需要进行更多匹配群体的前瞻性研究,以评估中和主要变体的 mAb 的全部益处和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Pharmacotherapy (AOP) is a peer-reviewed journal that advances pharmacotherapy throughout the world by publishing high-quality research and review articles to achieve the most desired health outcomes.The articles provide cutting-edge information about the most efficient, safe and cost-effective pharmacotherapy for the treatment and prevention of various illnesses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 14 days
期刊最新文献
Persistence Within 6P Medicine Model Has Value for Clinical Decision Only When Adherence Is Assessed. Comparative Dose Response of Diazepam, Lorazepam, and Phenobarbital for Alcohol Withdrawal in the Emergency Department. Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study of Bivalirudin Compared to Unfractionated Heparin in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Predictive Value of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Swab PCR Assay for MRSA Pneumonia in Critically Ill Stroke Patients. Duration of Concurrent Oxycodone and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors Use and the Risk of Opioid Overdose.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1