A narrative review of contemporary lethal pesticides: unveiling the ongoing threat of pesticide poisoning.

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-29 DOI:10.15441/ceem.23.167
Sangchun Choi, Gi Woon Kim, Hoon Lim
{"title":"A narrative review of contemporary lethal pesticides: unveiling the ongoing threat of pesticide poisoning.","authors":"Sangchun Choi, Gi Woon Kim, Hoon Lim","doi":"10.15441/ceem.23.167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Following the 2011 ban on paraquat sales, Korea has witnessed a significant reduction in the mortality rate associated with acute pesticide poisoning. Traditionally, paraquat and diquat, alongside several highly toxic organophosphates, carbamates, and organochlorine insecticides, have been recognized as culprits in causing fatalities among patients with acute pesticide poisoning. However, despite global efforts to curtail the use of these highly toxic pesticides, certain pesticides still exhibit a level of lethality surpassing their established clinical toxicity profiles. Understanding the clinical progression of these pesticides is paramount for physicians and toxicologists, as it holds the potential to enhance patient prognoses in cases of acute poisoning. This review aims to address the persistence of such highly lethal pesticides, which continue to pose a grave threat to victims of acute poisoning.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"335-348"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.23.167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following the 2011 ban on paraquat sales, Korea has witnessed a significant reduction in the mortality rate associated with acute pesticide poisoning. Traditionally, paraquat and diquat, alongside several highly toxic organophosphates, carbamates, and organochlorine insecticides, have been recognized as culprits in causing fatalities among patients with acute pesticide poisoning. However, despite global efforts to curtail the use of these highly toxic pesticides, certain pesticides still exhibit a level of lethality surpassing their established clinical toxicity profiles. Understanding the clinical progression of these pesticides is paramount for physicians and toxicologists, as it holds the potential to enhance patient prognoses in cases of acute poisoning. This review aims to address the persistence of such highly lethal pesticides, which continue to pose a grave threat to victims of acute poisoning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当代致命农药叙事评论》:揭开农药中毒的持续威胁。
继 2011 年禁止销售百草枯之后,韩国与急性杀虫剂中毒相关的死亡率大幅下降。传统上,百草枯和敌草快以及多种剧毒有机磷、氨基甲酸酯和有机氯杀虫剂被认为是导致急性农药中毒患者死亡的罪魁祸首。然而,尽管全球都在努力减少这些剧毒农药的使用,但某些农药的致死率仍然超过了其既定的临床毒性特征。对于医生和毒理学家来说,了解这些农药的临床进展至关重要,因为这有可能改善急性中毒患者的预后。本综述旨在探讨这类高致命性农药的持久性问题,它们继续对急性中毒的受害者构成严重威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
A narrative review of contemporary lethal pesticides: unveiling the ongoing threat of pesticide poisoning. The efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for skin perfusion following peripheral tissue injury due to usage of inotropes and vasopressors: a case report. Erector spinae plane block for intractable, nonsurgical abdominal pain: a scoping review. Factors associated with parental knowledge and attitudes toward pediatric concussions in Korea. Can left atrial diameter measured by computed tomography predict the presence and degree of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1