Predictability of the emergency department triage system during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-29 DOI:10.15441/ceem.23.107
Se Young Oh, Ji Hwan Lee, Min Joung Kim, Dong Ryul Ko, Hyun Soo Chung, Incheol Park, Jinwoo Myung
{"title":"Predictability of the emergency department triage system during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Se Young Oh, Ji Hwan Lee, Min Joung Kim, Dong Ryul Ko, Hyun Soo Chung, Incheol Park, Jinwoo Myung","doi":"10.15441/ceem.23.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Emergency department (ED) triage systems are used to classify the severity and urgency of emergency patients, and Korean medical institutions use the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS). During the COVID-19 pandemic, appropriate treatment for emergency patients was delayed due to various circumstances, such as overcrowding of EDs, lack of medical workforce resources, and increased workload on medical staff. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the KTAS in predicting the urgency of emergency patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively reviewed patients who were treated in the ED during the pandemic period from January 2020 to June 2021. Patients were divided into COVID-19-screening negative (SN) and COVID-19-screening positive (SP) groups. We compared the predictability of the KTAS for urgent patients between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a total of 107,480 patients, 62,776 patients (58.4%) were included in the SN group and 44,704 (41.6%) were included in the SP group. The odds ratios for severity variables at each KTAS level revealed a more evident discriminatory power of the KTAS for severity variables in the SN group (P<0.001). The predictability of the KTAS for severity variables was higher in the SN group than in the SP group (area under the curve, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During the pandemic, the KTAS had low accuracy in predicting patients in critical condition in the ED. Therefore, in future pandemic periods, supplementation of the current ED triage system should be considered in order to accurately classify the severity of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"195-204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11237259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.23.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Emergency department (ED) triage systems are used to classify the severity and urgency of emergency patients, and Korean medical institutions use the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS). During the COVID-19 pandemic, appropriate treatment for emergency patients was delayed due to various circumstances, such as overcrowding of EDs, lack of medical workforce resources, and increased workload on medical staff. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the KTAS in predicting the urgency of emergency patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed patients who were treated in the ED during the pandemic period from January 2020 to June 2021. Patients were divided into COVID-19-screening negative (SN) and COVID-19-screening positive (SP) groups. We compared the predictability of the KTAS for urgent patients between the two groups.

Results: From a total of 107,480 patients, 62,776 patients (58.4%) were included in the SN group and 44,704 (41.6%) were included in the SP group. The odds ratios for severity variables at each KTAS level revealed a more evident discriminatory power of the KTAS for severity variables in the SN group (P<0.001). The predictability of the KTAS for severity variables was higher in the SN group than in the SP group (area under the curve, P<0.001).

Conclusion: During the pandemic, the KTAS had low accuracy in predicting patients in critical condition in the ED. Therefore, in future pandemic periods, supplementation of the current ED triage system should be considered in order to accurately classify the severity of patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行期间急诊科分诊系统的可预测性。
背景:急诊科(ED)分诊系统用于对急诊病人的严重程度和紧急程度进行分类,韩国医疗机构使用韩国分诊和急性量表(KTAS)。在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,由于急诊室人满为患、医务人员资源匮乏、医务人员工作量增加等各种原因,急诊患者的适当治疗被延误。本研究旨在评估 KTAS 在 COVID-19 大流行期间预测急诊病人紧急程度的准确性:本研究对 2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月大流行期间在急诊室接受治疗的患者进行了回顾性分析。患者被分为 COVID-19 筛查阴性组(SN 组)和 COVID-19 筛查阳性组(SP 组)。我们比较了两组急诊患者 KTAS 的可预测性:在 107,480 名患者中,SN 组和 SP 组分别有 62,776 名(58.4%)和 44,704 名(41.6%)患者。KTAS各等级严重程度变量的几率比显示,KTAS对SN组严重程度变量的判别能力更明显(P值 结论:KTAS对SN组严重程度变量的判别能力更明显:在大流行期间,KTAS 预测急诊室危重病人的准确性较低。因此,在未来的大流行期间,应考虑对目前的急诊室分诊系统进行补充,以便准确地对患者的严重程度进行分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Acute iodinate contrast medium reaction: look at the CT images! Assessing the efficacy of electrocardiogram for heart rate evaluation during newborn resuscitation at birth: a prospective observational study. Case of multiple acute cerebral infarctions after blunt cerebrovascular injuries. Epidemiology of Deep Venous Thrombosis Among United States Emergency Departments Over an Eight-Year Period. Floating thrombus involving the aortic arch in a woman.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1