Experiences of a communication-skills course for care partners of people living with dementia, empowered conversations: A qualitative framework analysis

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-01-30 DOI:10.1111/bjc.12447
Lydia Morris, Anthea Innes, Tracey Williamson, Megan Wyatt, Emma Smith, Phil McEvoy
{"title":"Experiences of a communication-skills course for care partners of people living with dementia, empowered conversations: A qualitative framework analysis","authors":"Lydia Morris,&nbsp;Anthea Innes,&nbsp;Tracey Williamson,&nbsp;Megan Wyatt,&nbsp;Emma Smith,&nbsp;Phil McEvoy","doi":"10.1111/bjc.12447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Our aims were to examine whether an experiential course for care partners of people living with dementia, Empowered Conversations (EC), was acceptable to participants and to explore participants' perceptions of the impact of the course upon their communicative interactions. EC is based on an integrative model derived from psychological and linguistic theory and empirical evidence. EC is based on mentalisation theory, perceptual control theory and linguistic theory (The Communicative Impact Model).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative data were collected via 28 semistructured interviews. Framework analysis was used to analyse data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Three superordinate themes, ‘improved communication’, ‘improved well-being’ and ‘support through others’ were identified. Twenty-seven out of the 28 participants described feeling that they were able to better connect with the person living with dementia that they were supporting through attending EC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The findings indicated that EC was acceptable and beneficial to care partners. Care partners developed a range of strategies and understandings that enabled them to communicate better with the person they were supporting, enhanced well-being and relationships, as well as developing social networks. This is the first qualitative study to examine a psychosocial intervention for care partners of people living with dementia using a non-CBT framework and indicates that perceived control could influence how care partners respond to stress and difficulties.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjc.12447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Our aims were to examine whether an experiential course for care partners of people living with dementia, Empowered Conversations (EC), was acceptable to participants and to explore participants' perceptions of the impact of the course upon their communicative interactions. EC is based on an integrative model derived from psychological and linguistic theory and empirical evidence. EC is based on mentalisation theory, perceptual control theory and linguistic theory (The Communicative Impact Model).

Methods

Qualitative data were collected via 28 semistructured interviews. Framework analysis was used to analyse data.

Results

Three superordinate themes, ‘improved communication’, ‘improved well-being’ and ‘support through others’ were identified. Twenty-seven out of the 28 participants described feeling that they were able to better connect with the person living with dementia that they were supporting through attending EC.

Conclusions

The findings indicated that EC was acceptable and beneficial to care partners. Care partners developed a range of strategies and understandings that enabled them to communicate better with the person they were supporting, enhanced well-being and relationships, as well as developing social networks. This is the first qualitative study to examine a psychosocial intervention for care partners of people living with dementia using a non-CBT framework and indicates that perceived control could influence how care partners respond to stress and difficulties.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为痴呆症患者的护理伙伴开设的沟通技能课程的经验,增强对话能力:定性框架分析。
目的:我们的目的是研究痴呆症患者护理伙伴的体验课程 "增强对话能力(EC)"是否为参与者所接受,并探讨参与者对该课程对其交流互动的影响的看法。EC是基于心理学和语言学理论以及经验证据的综合模型。EC以心智化理论、知觉控制理论和语言理论(交际影响模型)为基础:方法:通过 28 个半结构式访谈收集定性数据。采用框架分析法对数据进行分析:结果:确定了 "改善交流"、"改善福祉 "和 "通过他人提供支持 "这三个首要主题。28 名参与者中有 27 人表示,他们感觉通过参加老年教育活动,能够更好地与他们所支持的痴呆症患者建立联系:研究结果表明,EC 是可以接受的,并且对护理伙伴有益。护理伙伴发展了一系列策略和理解,使他们能够与所支持的患者更好地沟通,增进了福祉和人际关系,并发展了社交网络。这是第一项采用非 CBT 框架对痴呆症患者的护理伙伴进行心理干预的定性研究,研究结果表明,感知控制会影响护理伙伴如何应对压力和困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Current status and obstacles of narrowing yield gaps of four major crops. Cold shock treatment alleviates pitting in sweet cherry fruit by enhancing antioxidant enzymes activity and regulating membrane lipid metabolism. Removal of proteins and lipids affects structure, in vitro digestion and physicochemical properties of rice flour modified by heat-moisture treatment. Investigating the impact of climate variables on the organic honey yield in Turkey using XGBoost machine learning. Evaluation of the potential of achachairu peel (Garcinia humilis) for the fortification of cereal-based foods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1