Tatjana Škrbić, Achille Giacometti, Trinh X Hoang, Amos Maritan, Jayanth R Banavar
{"title":"III. Geometrical framework for thinking about globular proteins: Turns in proteins.","authors":"Tatjana Škrbić, Achille Giacometti, Trinh X Hoang, Amos Maritan, Jayanth R Banavar","doi":"10.1002/prot.26671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have shown recently that the notion of poking pairwise interactions along a chain provides a unifying framework for understanding the formation of both secondary and the tertiary protein structure based on symmetry and geometry. α-helices and β-sheets are found to be special geometries that have systematic poking contacts in a repetitive manner with the contacts being local along the α-helix and non-local along a pair of adjacent strands within a β-sheet. Pairwise poking interactions also govern tertiary structure formation, but they are weaker and there are no special geometrical constraints as in secondary structure formation. Here we demonstrate that protein turns, the most prevalent non-repetitive structural element in proteins, are instances of local (as in α-helices) and isolated (non-repetitive) poking pairwise contacts for which the geometrical constraints are partially relaxed. This simple and purely geometrical definition of protein turns (also sometimes known as reverse turns, β-turns, β-bends, hairpin bends, 3<sub>10</sub> bends, kinks, widgets, etc.) provides a simple framework for unifying them. We present the results of a systematic analysis and identify their structural classes as well as their respective amino acid preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":56271,"journal":{"name":"Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics","volume":" ","pages":"341-358"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.26671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We have shown recently that the notion of poking pairwise interactions along a chain provides a unifying framework for understanding the formation of both secondary and the tertiary protein structure based on symmetry and geometry. α-helices and β-sheets are found to be special geometries that have systematic poking contacts in a repetitive manner with the contacts being local along the α-helix and non-local along a pair of adjacent strands within a β-sheet. Pairwise poking interactions also govern tertiary structure formation, but they are weaker and there are no special geometrical constraints as in secondary structure formation. Here we demonstrate that protein turns, the most prevalent non-repetitive structural element in proteins, are instances of local (as in α-helices) and isolated (non-repetitive) poking pairwise contacts for which the geometrical constraints are partially relaxed. This simple and purely geometrical definition of protein turns (also sometimes known as reverse turns, β-turns, β-bends, hairpin bends, 310 bends, kinks, widgets, etc.) provides a simple framework for unifying them. We present the results of a systematic analysis and identify their structural classes as well as their respective amino acid preferences.
期刊介绍:
PROTEINS : Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics publishes original reports of significant experimental and analytic research in all areas of protein research: structure, function, computation, genetics, and design. The journal encourages reports that present new experimental or computational approaches for interpreting and understanding data from biophysical chemistry, structural studies of proteins and macromolecular assemblies, alterations of protein structure and function engineered through techniques of molecular biology and genetics, functional analyses under physiologic conditions, as well as the interactions of proteins with receptors, nucleic acids, or other specific ligands or substrates. Research in protein and peptide biochemistry directed toward synthesizing or characterizing molecules that simulate aspects of the activity of proteins, or that act as inhibitors of protein function, is also within the scope of PROTEINS. In addition to full-length reports, short communications (usually not more than 4 printed pages) and prediction reports are welcome. Reviews are typically by invitation; authors are encouraged to submit proposed topics for consideration.