Functional evaluation of physical performance, gait, balance and activities of daily living in older individuals with long COVID syndrome

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Australasian Journal on Ageing Pub Date : 2024-01-29 DOI:10.1111/ajag.13274
Izzettin Kosel, Gamze Aydin, Laçin Naz Taşcilar Uyanik
{"title":"Functional evaluation of physical performance, gait, balance and activities of daily living in older individuals with long COVID syndrome","authors":"Izzettin Kosel,&nbsp;Gamze Aydin,&nbsp;Laçin Naz Taşcilar Uyanik","doi":"10.1111/ajag.13274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of our study was to evaluate the physical performance, balance, gait and activities of daily living (ADL) of older individuals with long COVID syndrome (LCS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 124 individuals (49% women) with a mean age of 71.8 ± 5.8 years were included in the study. Participants were divided into two groups, older individuals with LCS in the LCS group and older individuals who were not diagnosed with COVID-19 in the CON (control) group. Physical performance of participants was evaluated with the Alusti Test, balance and gait assessment was evaluated with the Tinetti Balance and Gait Assessment (TBGA), and ADL were evaluated with the Barthel Index (BI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the evaluations between groups, the mean score of active muscular mobility of right and left upper extremities, transfer supine position to sitting, trunk in sitting position and standing, which are among the subparameters of the Alusti Test, were statistically significantly lower in LCS compared to CON (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). TBGA total score and gait section mean score of TBGA were statistically significantly lower in LCS than in CON (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). There was no significant difference between the groups in the balance section of the TBGA and the mean BI scores (<i>p</i> &gt; .05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>It was concluded that physical performance parameters related to active muscular mobility of the upper extremity, transfer supine position to sitting, trunk in sitting position and walking in LCS were negatively affected by the disease, but this did not affect the level of balance and independence in ADL.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajag.13274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The aim of our study was to evaluate the physical performance, balance, gait and activities of daily living (ADL) of older individuals with long COVID syndrome (LCS).

Methods

A total of 124 individuals (49% women) with a mean age of 71.8 ± 5.8 years were included in the study. Participants were divided into two groups, older individuals with LCS in the LCS group and older individuals who were not diagnosed with COVID-19 in the CON (control) group. Physical performance of participants was evaluated with the Alusti Test, balance and gait assessment was evaluated with the Tinetti Balance and Gait Assessment (TBGA), and ADL were evaluated with the Barthel Index (BI).

Results

In the evaluations between groups, the mean score of active muscular mobility of right and left upper extremities, transfer supine position to sitting, trunk in sitting position and standing, which are among the subparameters of the Alusti Test, were statistically significantly lower in LCS compared to CON (p < .05). TBGA total score and gait section mean score of TBGA were statistically significantly lower in LCS than in CON (p < .05). There was no significant difference between the groups in the balance section of the TBGA and the mean BI scores (p > .05).

Conclusions

It was concluded that physical performance parameters related to active muscular mobility of the upper extremity, transfer supine position to sitting, trunk in sitting position and walking in LCS were negatively affected by the disease, but this did not affect the level of balance and independence in ADL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对患有长 COVID 综合征的老年人的身体表现、步态、平衡和日常生活活动进行功能评估。
研究目的我们的研究旨在评估患有长COVID综合征(LCS)的老年人的身体表现、平衡、步态和日常生活活动(ADL):研究共纳入 124 名患者(49% 为女性),平均年龄为 71.8 ± 5.8 岁。参与者被分为两组,长COVID-19综合征组为患有长COVID-19综合征的老年人,对照组为未被诊断患有长COVID-19综合征的老年人。参与者的体能表现由阿鲁斯提测试(Alusti Test)进行评估,平衡和步态评估由蒂内蒂平衡和步态评估(TBGA)进行评估,日常活动能力由巴特尔指数(Barthel Index,BI)进行评估:结果:在组间评估中,阿鲁斯蒂测试的子参数中,左右上肢主动肌肉活动度、仰卧位到坐位的转换、坐位躯干和站立的平均得分在统计学上,LCS 显著低于 CON(P.05):结论:与上肢主动肌肉活动度、仰卧位到坐位的转移、躯干坐位和行走相关的体能参数在 LCS 中受到疾病的负面影响,但这并不影响 ADL 中的平衡和独立性水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
Prescribing patterns in people living with dementia in the community: A cross-sectional study. The prevalence of falls and associated factors in older adults of the Torres Strait. Engaging under-represented oldest old in research: An approach for inclusive recruitment. Frailty in general medicine patients receiving geriatric medicine liaison services is predictive of adverse outcomes. Associations between dual-task walking and cognitive impairment in people attending a cognitive diagnostic clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1