Empowered Relief, cognitive behavioral therapy, and health education for people with chronic pain: a comparison of outcomes at 6-month Follow-up for a randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Pain Reports Pub Date : 2024-01-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000001116
Beth D Darnall, John W Burns, Juliette Hong, Anuradha Roy, Kristin Slater, Heather Poupore-King, Maisa S Ziadni, Dokyoung S You, Corinne Jung, Karon F Cook, Kate Lorig, Lu Tian, Sean C Mackey
{"title":"Empowered Relief, cognitive behavioral therapy, and health education for people with chronic pain: a comparison of outcomes at 6-month Follow-up for a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Beth D Darnall, John W Burns, Juliette Hong, Anuradha Roy, Kristin Slater, Heather Poupore-King, Maisa S Ziadni, Dokyoung S You, Corinne Jung, Karon F Cook, Kate Lorig, Lu Tian, Sean C Mackey","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We previously conducted a 3-arm randomized trial (263 adults with chronic low back pain) which compared group-based (1) single-session pain relief skills intervention (Empowered Relief; ER); (2) 8-session cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for chronic back pain; and (3) single-session health and back pain education class (HE). Results suggested non-inferiority of ER vs. CBT at 3 months post-treatment on an array of outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here, we tested the durability of treatment effects at 6 months post-treatment. We examined group differences in primary and secondary outcomes at 6 months and the degree to which outcomes eroded or improved from 3-month to 6-month within each treatment group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Empowered Relief remained non-inferior to CBT on most outcomes, whereas both ER and CBT remained superior to HE on most outcomes. Outcome improvements within ER did not decrease significantly from 3-month to 6-month, and indeed ER showed additional 3- to 6-month improvements on pain catastrophizing, pain bothersomeness, and anxiety. Effects of ER at 6 months post-treatment (moderate term outcomes) kept pace with effects reported by participants who underwent 8-session CBT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The maintenance of these absolute levels implies strong stability of ER effects. Results extend to 6 months post-treatment previous findings documenting that ER and CBT exhibit similarly potent effects on outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"9 1","pages":"e1116"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10824382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We previously conducted a 3-arm randomized trial (263 adults with chronic low back pain) which compared group-based (1) single-session pain relief skills intervention (Empowered Relief; ER); (2) 8-session cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for chronic back pain; and (3) single-session health and back pain education class (HE). Results suggested non-inferiority of ER vs. CBT at 3 months post-treatment on an array of outcomes.

Methods: Here, we tested the durability of treatment effects at 6 months post-treatment. We examined group differences in primary and secondary outcomes at 6 months and the degree to which outcomes eroded or improved from 3-month to 6-month within each treatment group.

Results: Empowered Relief remained non-inferior to CBT on most outcomes, whereas both ER and CBT remained superior to HE on most outcomes. Outcome improvements within ER did not decrease significantly from 3-month to 6-month, and indeed ER showed additional 3- to 6-month improvements on pain catastrophizing, pain bothersomeness, and anxiety. Effects of ER at 6 months post-treatment (moderate term outcomes) kept pace with effects reported by participants who underwent 8-session CBT.

Conclusions: The maintenance of these absolute levels implies strong stability of ER effects. Results extend to 6 months post-treatment previous findings documenting that ER and CBT exhibit similarly potent effects on outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对慢性疼痛患者的赋权缓解、认知行为疗法和健康教育:随机对照试验 6 个月随访结果比较。
简介我们曾进行过一项三臂随机试验(263 名患有慢性腰背痛的成人),比较了基于小组的(1)单次疼痛缓解技能干预(Empowered Relief;ER);(2)针对慢性腰背痛的 8 次认知行为疗法(CBT);以及(3)单次健康和腰背痛教育课(HE)。结果表明,在治疗后 3 个月,ER 与 CBT 相比,在一系列结果上并无劣势。方法:在此,我们测试了治疗后 6 个月治疗效果的持久性。方法:在此,我们测试了治疗后 6 个月时治疗效果的持久性。我们检查了 6 个月时主要和次要结果的组间差异,以及每个治疗组从 3 个月到 6 个月期间结果的侵蚀或改善程度:结果:在大多数结果上,Empowered Relief仍然不劣于CBT,而在大多数结果上,ER和CBT仍然优于HE。ER 的疗效从 3 个月到 6 个月并没有明显降低,而且 ER 在疼痛灾难化、疼痛难忍性和焦虑方面的疗效在 3 个月到 6 个月期间有了进一步提高。ER在治疗后6个月的效果(中期效果)与接受了8次CBT治疗的参与者所报告的效果保持一致:这些绝对水平的保持意味着急诊室治疗效果具有很强的稳定性。结论:这些绝对水平的保持意味着ER疗效具有很强的稳定性。研究结果将之前的研究结果延伸到了治疗后6个月,证明ER和CBT对疗效的影响相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Preexisting chronic pain is not associated with moderate-to-severe acute pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study. Why might fears and worries persist after a pain education-grounded multimodal intervention for chronic back pain? A qualitative study. Pain and small fiber pathology in men with fibromyalgia syndrome. Upregulated spinal histone deacetylases induce nociceptive sensitization by inhibiting the GABA system in chronic constriction injury-induced neuropathy in rats. Integrated manual therapies: IASP taskforce viewpoint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1