Realizing an Evidence-Based Framework for the Management and Delivery of Family Support Services.

Beth Archer-Kuhn, Candace Lind, Natalie Beltrano, Lisa Garrisen, Janet Hettler, Sandra Reilly
{"title":"Realizing an Evidence-Based Framework for the Management and Delivery of Family Support Services.","authors":"Beth Archer-Kuhn, Candace Lind, Natalie Beltrano, Lisa Garrisen, Janet Hettler, Sandra Reilly","doi":"10.1080/26408066.2024.2310599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This paper reports on how service providers and academic researchers partnered to support the journey of a primary prevention organization in western Canada as they reviewed their programming against an evidence-based practice (EBP) framework. The process allows the organization to increase their EBP culture by encouraging staff understanding and uptake of their nine family support programs. It also informs service users and other stakeholders of the evidentiary status of different kinds of support services. In this way, the families become more informed and engaged partners who might easily evaluate the respective risks and benefits of the various applications.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>As part of the process, an evidence-based framework used a common language to assess the efficacy of the respective nine programs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All nine programs are now mapped into the EBP framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review allows staff to become more intentional and informed about the EBPs they employ to support vulnerable families and to use this knowledge to better inform the families with whom they work. This paper and the process the agency followed can be a model for other organizations who serve families experiencing short-term housing crisis, provide infant nursery care, and other support services for families with young children.</p>","PeriodicalId":73742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","volume":" ","pages":"455-473"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2024.2310599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This paper reports on how service providers and academic researchers partnered to support the journey of a primary prevention organization in western Canada as they reviewed their programming against an evidence-based practice (EBP) framework. The process allows the organization to increase their EBP culture by encouraging staff understanding and uptake of their nine family support programs. It also informs service users and other stakeholders of the evidentiary status of different kinds of support services. In this way, the families become more informed and engaged partners who might easily evaluate the respective risks and benefits of the various applications.

Method: As part of the process, an evidence-based framework used a common language to assess the efficacy of the respective nine programs.

Results: All nine programs are now mapped into the EBP framework.

Conclusions: This review allows staff to become more intentional and informed about the EBPs they employ to support vulnerable families and to use this knowledge to better inform the families with whom they work. This paper and the process the agency followed can be a model for other organizations who serve families experiencing short-term housing crisis, provide infant nursery care, and other support services for families with young children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实现以证据为基础的家庭支持服务管理和提供框架。
目的:本文报告了加拿大西部的一个初级预防组织如何与服务提供者和学术研究人员合作,支持他们根据循证实践(EBP)框架审查其计划编制的过程。这一过程通过鼓励员工理解和采纳他们的九个家庭支持计划,使该组织增强了他们的 EBP 文化。它还让服务用户和其他利益相关者了解不同类型支持服务的证据地位。这样,家庭就会成为更加知情和参与的伙伴,可以轻松地评估各种应用各自的风险和益处:方法:作为该过程的一部分,一个基于证据的框架使用一种共同语言来评估九项计划各自的功效:结果:所有九项计划现在都被纳入了 EBP 框架:这次审查使工作人员能够更有意识地了解他们为支持弱势家庭而采用的 EBPs,并利用这些知识更好地为他们工作的家庭提供信息。这篇论文和该机构所遵循的程序可以为其他为经历短期住房危机的家庭提供服务、为有幼儿的家庭提供婴儿托儿服务和其他支持服务的机构树立典范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mental Health Problems of Self-Employed Workers: A Systematic Review of Potential Moderators. Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Revised Attitudes Toward Research Scale for Use with MSW Students. Racial Discrimination and Mental Health: Analyzing the Impact of Discrimination, Stress, Depressive Symptoms and Self-Esteem on Anxiety Experiences. Implementing Evidence-Based Practices in Rural Areas: Development and Testing of a Researcher Practitioner Collaboration in Mental Health. The Role of Social Support in Enhancing Life Satisfaction Among Syrian Refugees in Türkiye During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1