The effect of lexicalization biases on cross-situational statistical learning of novel verbs

IF 1.1 3区 心理学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language and Cognition Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1017/langcog.2023.70
Nathan R. George, Sabina Ciaccio, Lucia Berry, Daniel J. Weiss
{"title":"The effect of lexicalization biases on cross-situational statistical learning of novel verbs","authors":"Nathan R. George, Sabina Ciaccio, Lucia Berry, Daniel J. Weiss","doi":"10.1017/langcog.2023.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Languages vary in the mapping of relational terms onto events. For instance, English motion descriptions favor manner (how something moves) verbs over path (where something move) verbs, whereas those of other languages, like Spanish, show the opposite pattern. While these lexicalization biases are malleable, adopting a novel lexicalization pattern can be slow for second language learners. One potential mechanism for learning non-native verb mappings is cross-situational statistical learning (CSSL). However, the application of CSSL to verbs is limited and does not explicitly examine how lexicalization biases may complicate adults’ ability to resolve the referential uncertainty of multiple referents. We ask English-speaking monolingual adults to learn the mappings of ten verbs via CSSL. Verbs mapped onto either manner or path of motion, with the other event component held constant. Adults in both conditions demonstrated successful learning of novel verbs, with adults learning the manner verbs showing more consistent performance across accepting correct referents and rejecting incorrect ones. Our results are the first to demonstrate adults’ use of CSSL to acquire verb meanings that both align with and cut against native lexicalization biases and suggest a limited influence of lexicalization biases on adults’ learning in idealized CSSL conditions.","PeriodicalId":45880,"journal":{"name":"Language and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2023.70","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Languages vary in the mapping of relational terms onto events. For instance, English motion descriptions favor manner (how something moves) verbs over path (where something move) verbs, whereas those of other languages, like Spanish, show the opposite pattern. While these lexicalization biases are malleable, adopting a novel lexicalization pattern can be slow for second language learners. One potential mechanism for learning non-native verb mappings is cross-situational statistical learning (CSSL). However, the application of CSSL to verbs is limited and does not explicitly examine how lexicalization biases may complicate adults’ ability to resolve the referential uncertainty of multiple referents. We ask English-speaking monolingual adults to learn the mappings of ten verbs via CSSL. Verbs mapped onto either manner or path of motion, with the other event component held constant. Adults in both conditions demonstrated successful learning of novel verbs, with adults learning the manner verbs showing more consistent performance across accepting correct referents and rejecting incorrect ones. Our results are the first to demonstrate adults’ use of CSSL to acquire verb meanings that both align with and cut against native lexicalization biases and suggest a limited influence of lexicalization biases on adults’ learning in idealized CSSL conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
词汇化偏差对新动词跨情境统计学习的影响
各种语言在将关系词映射到事件上时各不相同。例如,英语的运动描述偏向于方式(事物如何运动)动词,而不是路径(事物在哪里运动)动词,而其他语言(如西班牙语)的运动描述则显示出相反的模式。虽然这些词汇化偏向是可塑的,但对于第二语言学习者来说,采用新的词汇化模式可能会很慢。学习非母语动词映射的一种潜在机制是跨情景统计学习(CSSL)。然而,CSSL 在动词方面的应用很有限,而且没有明确研究词汇化偏差如何使成人解决多指不确定性的能力复杂化。我们要求说英语的单语成人通过 CSSL 学习十个动词的映射。在其他事件成分保持不变的情况下,动词映射到运动方式或运动路径上。两种条件下的成人都成功地学习了新动词,其中学习方式动词的成人在接受正确参照物和拒绝错误参照物时表现得更为一致。我们的研究结果首次证明了成人使用 CSSL 来学习动词词义时,既与本地词汇化偏向一致,又与本地词汇化偏向相悖,并表明在理想化 CSSL 条件下,词汇化偏向对成人学习的影响是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Multimodal training on L2 Japanese pitch accent: learning outcomes, neural correlates and subjective assessments Head metonymies and metaphors in Jordanian and Tunisian Arabic: an extended conceptual metaphor theory perspective Facial expressions in different communication settings: A case of whispering and speaking with a face mask in Farsi The effect of emotional prosody and referent characteristics on novel noun learning Inherent linguistic preference outcompetes incidental alignment in cooperative partner choice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1