Proton pump inhibitors and risk of bloodstream infection without an identifiable source: a hospital-based case-control study

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Japanese journal of infectious diseases Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI:10.7883/yoken.jjid.2023.253
Shintaro Hayashi, Tomohito Moriyama, Yuichiro Ito, Yuta Harada, Hiroki Dodo, Kana Kumahara, Tatsuji Yogi, Noritsugu Ohashi, Reiji Higashi, Akihiro Mori
{"title":"Proton pump inhibitors and risk of bloodstream infection without an identifiable source: a hospital-based case-control study","authors":"Shintaro Hayashi, Tomohito Moriyama, Yuichiro Ito, Yuta Harada, Hiroki Dodo, Kana Kumahara, Tatsuji Yogi, Noritsugu Ohashi, Reiji Higashi, Akihiro Mori","doi":"10.7883/yoken.jjid.2023.253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"</p><p>The association between proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) use and systemic infections caused by bacterial translocation is unclear. This study aims to investigate whether patients receiving PPI therapy have a higher risk for bloodstream infections (BSI) without an identifiable source of infection, as an alternative indicator of BSI secondary to bacterial translocation. We conducted a hospital-based case–control study which enrolled all patients aged 20 years and older who developed BSI confirmed by two sets of positive blood culture and had inpatient care in Ichinomiya-Nishi Hospital in 2019. Patients’ data were collected from medical records, and bacterial translocation type (BT-type) BSI group were defined as those who had BSI without an identifiable source of infection, whereas the others were classified control group based on the diagnostic criteria for each infectious disease. We analyzed data from 309 patients, including 66 cases and 243 controls. PPI users had a 2.4-fold higher risk of developing BT-type BSI compared to non-PPI-users after controlling for potential confounders (OR: 2.41, 95% CI: 1.29–4.51<i>, p</i>=0.006). In conclusion, PPI use is associated with higher risk of BSI without an identifiable source and therefore, PPI use may increase the risk of septic morbidity secondary to bacterial translocation.</p>\n<p></p>","PeriodicalId":14608,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of infectious diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7883/yoken.jjid.2023.253","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The association between proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) use and systemic infections caused by bacterial translocation is unclear. This study aims to investigate whether patients receiving PPI therapy have a higher risk for bloodstream infections (BSI) without an identifiable source of infection, as an alternative indicator of BSI secondary to bacterial translocation. We conducted a hospital-based case–control study which enrolled all patients aged 20 years and older who developed BSI confirmed by two sets of positive blood culture and had inpatient care in Ichinomiya-Nishi Hospital in 2019. Patients’ data were collected from medical records, and bacterial translocation type (BT-type) BSI group were defined as those who had BSI without an identifiable source of infection, whereas the others were classified control group based on the diagnostic criteria for each infectious disease. We analyzed data from 309 patients, including 66 cases and 243 controls. PPI users had a 2.4-fold higher risk of developing BT-type BSI compared to non-PPI-users after controlling for potential confounders (OR: 2.41, 95% CI: 1.29–4.51, p=0.006). In conclusion, PPI use is associated with higher risk of BSI without an identifiable source and therefore, PPI use may increase the risk of septic morbidity secondary to bacterial translocation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
质子泵抑制剂与无法确定来源的血流感染风险:一项基于医院的病例对照研究
质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的使用与细菌转位引起的全身感染之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨接受质子泵抑制剂治疗的患者在没有可识别感染源的情况下发生血流感染(BSI)的风险是否更高,以此作为继发于细菌转位的 BSI 的替代指标。我们开展了一项基于医院的病例对照研究,纳入了所有年龄在 20 岁及以上、经两组阳性血液培养证实为 BSI 的患者,他们于 2019 年在一宫西医院接受了住院治疗。患者的数据来自病历,细菌易位型(BT 型)BSI 组被定义为没有可识别感染源的 BSI 患者,而其他患者则根据每种传染病的诊断标准被划分为对照组。我们分析了 309 名患者的数据,其中包括 66 例病例和 243 例对照。在控制了潜在的混杂因素后,PPI 使用者发生 BT 型 BSI 的风险是非 PPI 使用者的 2.4 倍(OR:2.41,95% CI:1.29-4.51,P=0.006)。总之,使用 PPI 与较高的无可识别来源 BSI 风险相关,因此,使用 PPI 可能会增加继发于细菌易位的脓毒症发病风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
172
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases (JJID), an official bimonthly publication of National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan, publishes papers dealing with basic research on infectious diseases relevant to humans in the fields of bacteriology, virology, mycology, parasitology, medical entomology, vaccinology, and toxinology. Pathology, immunology, biochemistry, and blood safety related to microbial pathogens are among the fields covered. Sections include: original papers, short communications, epidemiological reports, methods, laboratory and epidemiology communications, letters to the editor, and reviews.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Efficacy of Therapeutic Agents for Clostridioides difficile Infection Based on Four Severity Classifications. Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Rodent Populations in Tokyo, Japan. Time from admission to the onset of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in a single acute care hospital in Japan. Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Improves Indicators and Short-Term Survival in People with AIDS Manifesting Sepsis and Acute Kidney Injury. Clinical Course and Molecular Characterization of Human Bocavirus Associated with Acute Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Northern India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1