AI-artifacts in engineering change management – a systematic literature review

IF 2.3 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Research in Engineering Design Pub Date : 2024-01-29 DOI:10.1007/s00163-023-00430-6
Peter Burggräf, Johannes Wagner, Till Saßmannshausen, Tim Weißer, Ognjen Radisic-Aberger
{"title":"AI-artifacts in engineering change management – a systematic literature review","authors":"Peter Burggräf, Johannes Wagner, Till Saßmannshausen, Tim Weißer, Ognjen Radisic-Aberger","doi":"10.1007/s00163-023-00430-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Changes and modifications to existing products, known as engineering changes (EC), are common in complex product development. They require appropriate implementation planning and supervision to mitigate the economic downsides due to complexity. These tasks, however, take a high administrative toll on the organization. In response, automation by computer tools has been suggested. Due to the underlying process complexity, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) is advised. To support research and development of new AI-artifacts for EC management (ECM), a knowledge base is required. Thus, this paper aims to gather insights from existing approaches and discover literature gaps by conducting a systematic literature review. 39 publications applying AI methods and algorithms in ECM were identified and subsequently discussed. The analysis shows that the methods vary and are mostly utilized for predicting change propagation and knowledge retrieval. The review’s results suggest that AI in EC requires developing distributed AI systems to manage the ensuing complexity. Additionally, five concrete suggestions are presented as future research needs: Research on metaheuristics for optimizing EC schedules, testing of stacked machine learning methods for process outcome prediction, establishment of process supervision, development of the mentioned distributed AI systems for automation, and validation with industry partners.</p>","PeriodicalId":49629,"journal":{"name":"Research in Engineering Design","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Engineering Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-023-00430-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Changes and modifications to existing products, known as engineering changes (EC), are common in complex product development. They require appropriate implementation planning and supervision to mitigate the economic downsides due to complexity. These tasks, however, take a high administrative toll on the organization. In response, automation by computer tools has been suggested. Due to the underlying process complexity, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) is advised. To support research and development of new AI-artifacts for EC management (ECM), a knowledge base is required. Thus, this paper aims to gather insights from existing approaches and discover literature gaps by conducting a systematic literature review. 39 publications applying AI methods and algorithms in ECM were identified and subsequently discussed. The analysis shows that the methods vary and are mostly utilized for predicting change propagation and knowledge retrieval. The review’s results suggest that AI in EC requires developing distributed AI systems to manage the ensuing complexity. Additionally, five concrete suggestions are presented as future research needs: Research on metaheuristics for optimizing EC schedules, testing of stacked machine learning methods for process outcome prediction, establishment of process supervision, development of the mentioned distributed AI systems for automation, and validation with industry partners.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工程变更管理中的人工智能工件--系统性文献综述
对现有产品进行变更和修改,即工程变更(EC),是复杂产品开发中的常见现象。它们需要适当的实施规划和监督,以减少复杂性带来的经济损失。然而,这些任务会给组织带来高昂的行政费用。为此,有人建议使用计算机工具实现自动化。由于基本流程的复杂性,建议应用人工智能(AI)。为支持研究和开发用于电子文件管理(ECM)的新人工智能工具,需要一个知识库。因此,本文旨在通过进行系统的文献综述,从现有方法中收集见解并发现文献空白。本文确定了 39 篇在 ECM 中应用人工智能方法和算法的出版物,并随后进行了讨论。分析表明,这些方法各不相同,主要用于预测变化传播和知识检索。综述结果表明,EC 中的人工智能需要开发分布式人工智能系统,以管理随之而来的复杂性。此外,还就未来的研究需求提出了五项具体建议:研究用于优化 EC 计划的元搜索、测试用于过程结果预测的叠加式机器学习方法、建立过程监督、开发上述用于自动化的分布式人工智能系统,以及与行业合作伙伴进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Engineering Design
Research in Engineering Design 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
23
审稿时长
18 months
期刊介绍: Research in Engineering Design is an international journal that publishes research papers on design theory and methodology in all fields of engineering, focussing on mechanical, civil, architectural, and manufacturing engineering. The journal is designed for professionals in academia, industry and government interested in research issues relevant to design practice. Papers emphasize underlying principles of engineering design and discipline-oriented research where results are of interest or extendible to other engineering domains. General areas of interest include theories of design, foundations of design environments, representations and languages, models of design processes, and integration of design and manufacturing. Representative topics include functional representation, feature-based design, shape grammars, process design, redesign, product data base models, and empirical studies. The journal also publishes state-of-the-art review articles.
期刊最新文献
The effect of targeting both quantitative and qualitative objectives in generative design tools on the design outcomes M-ARM: An automated systematic approach for generating new variant design options from an existing product family A proposal for an operational methodology to assist the ranking-aggregation problem in manufacturing The impacts of non-perceptual cognition (NPC) on design process and ideation A new method to prioritize the QFDs’ engineering characteristics inspired by the Law of  Comparative Judgment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1