Calibration of burst strength models of corroded pipelines using the hierarchical Bayesian method

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Structural Safety Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.strusafe.2024.102444
U. Bhardwaj, A.P. Teixeira, C. Guedes Soares
{"title":"Calibration of burst strength models of corroded pipelines using the hierarchical Bayesian method","authors":"U. Bhardwaj,&nbsp;A.P. Teixeira,&nbsp;C. Guedes Soares","doi":"10.1016/j.strusafe.2024.102444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper proposes a probabilistic framework to calibrate burst strength models of intact and corroded pipelines based on the hierarchical Bayesian method. The approach uses burst test data of intact and corroded pipelines of different steel grades compiled from the literature and accounts for the variations among the data sources. First, the most appropriate burst strength models for corrosion-free and corroded pipelines are adopted. The burst pressure prediction models are categorised under low, medium and high-grade steel classes. Using the hierarchical Bayesian approach model uncertainty factors are derived to calibrate the burst strength models. The mean values and uncertainty of posterior probabilities of the model uncertainty factors are estimated for intact and corroded pipelines in three material categories. This study further investigates the uncertainty propagated by calibrated and non-calibrated models and draws important observations regarding the uncertainty associated with the calibration. The prediction uncertainties follow a non-linear increasing trend as corrosion defect increases. This study's importance is demonstrated with a case study that shows the differences in the uncertainty resulting from the use of the proposed approach compared to the conventional method. Additionally, for corroded pipes, model uncertainty factors are described as a function of defect depth with regression parameters estimated from hierarchical Bayesian-based regression analysis. Finally, a comparison between calibrated and non-calibrated models indicates that the calibrated models provide non-conservative predictions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21978,"journal":{"name":"Structural Safety","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 102444"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167473024000158/pdfft?md5=7a729f4829186e0b2872c3c8428bb482&pid=1-s2.0-S0167473024000158-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167473024000158","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper proposes a probabilistic framework to calibrate burst strength models of intact and corroded pipelines based on the hierarchical Bayesian method. The approach uses burst test data of intact and corroded pipelines of different steel grades compiled from the literature and accounts for the variations among the data sources. First, the most appropriate burst strength models for corrosion-free and corroded pipelines are adopted. The burst pressure prediction models are categorised under low, medium and high-grade steel classes. Using the hierarchical Bayesian approach model uncertainty factors are derived to calibrate the burst strength models. The mean values and uncertainty of posterior probabilities of the model uncertainty factors are estimated for intact and corroded pipelines in three material categories. This study further investigates the uncertainty propagated by calibrated and non-calibrated models and draws important observations regarding the uncertainty associated with the calibration. The prediction uncertainties follow a non-linear increasing trend as corrosion defect increases. This study's importance is demonstrated with a case study that shows the differences in the uncertainty resulting from the use of the proposed approach compared to the conventional method. Additionally, for corroded pipes, model uncertainty factors are described as a function of defect depth with regression parameters estimated from hierarchical Bayesian-based regression analysis. Finally, a comparison between calibrated and non-calibrated models indicates that the calibrated models provide non-conservative predictions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用分层贝叶斯法校准腐蚀管道的爆破强度模型
本文提出了一种基于分层贝叶斯法的概率框架,用于校准完好和腐蚀管道的爆破强度模型。该方法使用了从文献中收集的不同钢级的完好和腐蚀管道的爆破试验数据,并考虑了数据源之间的差异。首先,采用最适合无腐蚀和腐蚀管道的爆破强度模型。爆破压力预测模型分为低级、中级和高级钢级。使用分层贝叶斯方法得出模型不确定性因子,以校准爆破强度模型。对三种材料类别中完好和腐蚀管道的模型不确定性因子的平均值和后验概率的不确定性进行了估算。本研究进一步调查了校准和非校准模型传播的不确定性,并得出了与校准相关的不确定性的重要结论。随着腐蚀缺陷的增加,预测不确定性呈非线性增加趋势。这项研究的重要性体现在一个案例研究中,该案例显示了与传统方法相比,使用建议方法所产生的不确定性差异。此外,对于腐蚀管道,模型不确定性因素被描述为缺陷深度的函数,其回归参数由基于贝叶斯的分层回归分析估算得出。最后,校准模型和非校准模型之间的比较表明,校准模型提供了非保守预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Structural Safety
Structural Safety 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
8.60%
发文量
67
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Structural Safety is an international journal devoted to integrated risk assessment for a wide range of constructed facilities such as buildings, bridges, earth structures, offshore facilities, dams, lifelines and nuclear structural systems. Its purpose is to foster communication about risk and reliability among technical disciplines involved in design and construction, and to enhance the use of risk management in the constructed environment
期刊最新文献
Bivariate cubic normal distribution for non-Gaussian problems Yet another Bayesian active learning reliability analysis method Improved Bayesian model updating of geomaterial parameters for slope reliability assessment considering spatial variability Editorial Board Data-enhanced design charts for efficient reliability-based design of geotechnical systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1