Comparison of three different prophylactic treatments for postoperative nausea and vomiting after total joint arthroplasty under general anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial

Jinwei Xie, Yingcun Cai, Fuxing Pei
{"title":"Comparison of three different prophylactic treatments for postoperative nausea and vomiting after total joint arthroplasty under general anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial","authors":"Jinwei Xie, Yingcun Cai, Fuxing Pei","doi":"10.1186/s40360-024-00735-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after total joint arthroplasty is common and associated with delayed recovery. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of three different prophylactic regimens for PONV after total joint arthroplasty under general anesthesia. Patients undergoing primary total hip or knee arthroplasty were randomized to Group A (ondansetron), Group B (10 mg dexamethasone plus ondansetron and mosapride), or Group C (three doses of 10 mg dexamethasone plus ondansetron and mosapride). The primary outcome was the total incidence of PONV during postoperative 48 h. The secondary outcomes were complete response, rescue antiemetic treatment, opioid consumption, time until first defecation, postoperative appetite score, satisfaction score, length of hospital stay, blood glucose level, and complications. Patients in Group C experienced a lower incidence of total PONV (29.3%, p = 0.001) and a higher incidence of complete response (70.7%, p = 0.001) than did patients in Group A (51.9%, 48.2%, respectively). Patients in Group C also experienced a lower incidence of severe PONV (4.3%) than patients in Group A (25.9%, p<0.001) and B (20.4%, p<0.001). Moreover, less rescue antiemetic treatment (1.4 ± 0.5 mg Metoclopramide) and postoperative opioid consumption (1.8 ± 0.3 mg Oxycodone, 6.0 ± 1.0 mg Pethidine) was needed in Group C. Additionally, a shorter time until first defecation, shorter length of stay, and better postoperative appetite scores and satisfaction scores were detected in patients in Group C. A slight increase in the fasting blood glucose level was observed in Group C, and the complications were comparable among the groups. Combined use of ondansetron, mosapride and three doses of dexamethasone can provide better antiemetic effectiveness, postoperative appetite, bowel function recovery, and pain relief than a single dose or ondansetron only. The protocol was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800015896, April 27, 2018).","PeriodicalId":501597,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-024-00735-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after total joint arthroplasty is common and associated with delayed recovery. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of three different prophylactic regimens for PONV after total joint arthroplasty under general anesthesia. Patients undergoing primary total hip or knee arthroplasty were randomized to Group A (ondansetron), Group B (10 mg dexamethasone plus ondansetron and mosapride), or Group C (three doses of 10 mg dexamethasone plus ondansetron and mosapride). The primary outcome was the total incidence of PONV during postoperative 48 h. The secondary outcomes were complete response, rescue antiemetic treatment, opioid consumption, time until first defecation, postoperative appetite score, satisfaction score, length of hospital stay, blood glucose level, and complications. Patients in Group C experienced a lower incidence of total PONV (29.3%, p = 0.001) and a higher incidence of complete response (70.7%, p = 0.001) than did patients in Group A (51.9%, 48.2%, respectively). Patients in Group C also experienced a lower incidence of severe PONV (4.3%) than patients in Group A (25.9%, p<0.001) and B (20.4%, p<0.001). Moreover, less rescue antiemetic treatment (1.4 ± 0.5 mg Metoclopramide) and postoperative opioid consumption (1.8 ± 0.3 mg Oxycodone, 6.0 ± 1.0 mg Pethidine) was needed in Group C. Additionally, a shorter time until first defecation, shorter length of stay, and better postoperative appetite scores and satisfaction scores were detected in patients in Group C. A slight increase in the fasting blood glucose level was observed in Group C, and the complications were comparable among the groups. Combined use of ondansetron, mosapride and three doses of dexamethasone can provide better antiemetic effectiveness, postoperative appetite, bowel function recovery, and pain relief than a single dose or ondansetron only. The protocol was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800015896, April 27, 2018).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全身麻醉下全关节置换术后恶心和呕吐的三种不同预防疗法比较:随机临床试验
全关节置换术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)很常见,并与延迟康复有关。本研究旨在评估三种不同的预防方案对全身麻醉下全关节置换术后 PONV 的疗效。接受初级全髋关节或膝关节置换术的患者被随机分为 A 组(昂丹司琼)、B 组(10 毫克地塞米松加昂丹司琼和莫沙必利)或 C 组(三次剂量的 10 毫克地塞米松加昂丹司琼和莫沙必利)。主要结果是术后 48 小时内 PONV 的总发生率,次要结果是完全反应、止吐治疗、阿片类药物用量、首次排便时间、术后食欲评分、满意度评分、住院时间、血糖水平和并发症。与 A 组患者(分别为 51.9%、48.2%)相比,C 组患者的总 PONV 发生率较低(29.3%,P = 0.001),完全反应发生率较高(70.7%,P = 0.001)。与 A 组(25.9%,p<0.001)和 B 组(20.4%,p<0.001)患者相比,C 组患者的严重呕吐发生率(4.3%)也更低。此外,C 组患者所需的术后止吐药(1.4 ± 0.5 毫克甲氧氯普胺)和阿片类药物(1.8 ± 0.3 毫克羟考酮、6.0 ± 1.0 毫克哌替啶)用量也较少。此外,C 组患者首次排便时间更短、住院时间更短、术后食欲评分和满意度评分更好。联合使用昂丹司琼、莫沙必利和三种剂量的地塞米松在止吐效果、术后食欲、肠道功能恢复和止痛方面均优于单药或仅使用昂丹司琼。该方案已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR1800015896,2018年4月27日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stratified analysis of the association between anti-obesity medications and digestive adverse events: a real-world study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system database Safety assessment of asenapine in the FAERS database: real adverse event analysis and discussion on neurological and psychiatric side effects A systematic review and Bayesian analysis of the adverse effects of dienogest A systematic review of the drug-drug interaction between Statins and Quinolones Sustained release delivery of favipiravir through statistically optimized, chemically cross-linked, pH-sensitive, swellable hydrogel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1