The institutional environment and gig platform transaction cost solutions

IF 2.4 2区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Institutional Economics Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1017/s1744137423000383
Svetlana Golovanova, Eduardo Pontual Ribeiro, Evgeny Styrin, Ivan Makarov
{"title":"The institutional environment and gig platform transaction cost solutions","authors":"Svetlana Golovanova, Eduardo Pontual Ribeiro, Evgeny Styrin, Ivan Makarov","doi":"10.1017/s1744137423000383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A growing number of labour market participants transact through gig platforms. This choice should reflect a reduction in transaction costs for platform users, compared to costs they meet when using alternative modes of governance. We exploit a unique cross-platform, cross-country data set of gig platform users to test the impact of the institutional environment in one of its dimensions – the strictness of labour market regulation (LMR) – on the ability of gig platforms to reduce users' transaction costs. According to our findings, the regulation indicator of both the user and platform countries influences transaction costs for platform users, even controlling for platform and user characteristics. The platform appears to reduce transaction costs most when users face stricter <jats:italic>or</jats:italic> weaker LMR, in a U-shaped effect. In the former case, the platform may provide an escape from labour regulations when hiring for tasks, while in the latter case, the platform can economize on the usual transaction costs of private contracting by administrating some types of users' activities.","PeriodicalId":47221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Institutional Economics","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Institutional Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744137423000383","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A growing number of labour market participants transact through gig platforms. This choice should reflect a reduction in transaction costs for platform users, compared to costs they meet when using alternative modes of governance. We exploit a unique cross-platform, cross-country data set of gig platform users to test the impact of the institutional environment in one of its dimensions – the strictness of labour market regulation (LMR) – on the ability of gig platforms to reduce users' transaction costs. According to our findings, the regulation indicator of both the user and platform countries influences transaction costs for platform users, even controlling for platform and user characteristics. The platform appears to reduce transaction costs most when users face stricter or weaker LMR, in a U-shaped effect. In the former case, the platform may provide an escape from labour regulations when hiring for tasks, while in the latter case, the platform can economize on the usual transaction costs of private contracting by administrating some types of users' activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制度环境和千兆平台交易成本解决方案
越来越多的劳动力市场参与者通过演出平台进行交易。与使用其他治理模式时的成本相比,这种选择应反映出平台用户交易成本的降低。我们利用一个独特的跨平台、跨国家的演出平台用户数据集,检验了制度环境的一个维度--劳动力市场监管(LMR)的严格程度--对演出平台降低用户交易成本能力的影响。根据我们的研究结果,即使控制了平台和用户的特征,用户和平台所在国的监管指标也会影响平台用户的交易成本。当用户面临更严格或更薄弱的 LMR 时,平台似乎能最大程度地降低交易成本,呈 U 型效应。在前一种情况下,平台可以在招聘任务时逃避劳动法规的约束,而在后一种情况下,平台可以通过管理某些类型的用户活动来节约私人订约的通常交易成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
The role of political institutions in the Eurozone's economic convergence process Legal pluralism, ideology, and institutional change: the evolution of institutions for coastal resource governance in Ghana The economics of cognitive institutions: mapping debates, looking ahead Environmental enforcement, property rights, and violence: evidence from the Brazilian Amazon Economic freedom and academic freedom across nations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1