Understanding perceived loneliness: a multifaceted approach

IF 0.8 Q4 SOCIAL WORK Mental Health and Social Inclusion Pub Date : 2024-01-30 DOI:10.1108/mhsi-10-2023-0114
Vaishnavi Sharma
{"title":"Understanding perceived loneliness: a multifaceted approach","authors":"Vaishnavi Sharma","doi":"10.1108/mhsi-10-2023-0114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to understand loneliness with a special focus on perceived loneliness using a multifaceted approach.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTo the best of the author’s knowledge, this appears to be the first paper dedicated to investigating the perception of loneliness as its primary topic. Unfortunately, not much work is available on this specific focus. However, various facets and dimensions can be integrated to gain a better understanding. Therefore, the author has carefully selected four sections, each focusing on different aspects of loneliness. These sections can contribute to a better understanding of loneliness, keeping in mind its perception.\n\n\nFindings\nSection one examines the cognitive processes and self-assessment mechanisms that set lonely individuals apart from their non-lonely counterparts. These include heightened awareness, negative social cue interpretation and increased sensitivity to social threats. Section two examines the predictors of loneliness and associated emotional responses. This includes factors such as emotional responses, attributions, duration and situational variables. Section three challenges conventional definitions of loneliness by introducing social asymmetry. Within this framework, personality traits such as extraversion emerge as resilient against loneliness, even in social isolation. Section four discusses the significant influence of cultural diversity on perceptions of loneliness. Collectivist cultures rely on familial and community support to combat loneliness, whereas individualistic cultures require interventions that promote independence.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis comprehensive examination contributes insights for informing targeted interventions, reinforcing support systems and enhancing our understanding of human connectivity in an increasingly isolated world.\n","PeriodicalId":44476,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health and Social Inclusion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health and Social Inclusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mhsi-10-2023-0114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to understand loneliness with a special focus on perceived loneliness using a multifaceted approach. Design/methodology/approach To the best of the author’s knowledge, this appears to be the first paper dedicated to investigating the perception of loneliness as its primary topic. Unfortunately, not much work is available on this specific focus. However, various facets and dimensions can be integrated to gain a better understanding. Therefore, the author has carefully selected four sections, each focusing on different aspects of loneliness. These sections can contribute to a better understanding of loneliness, keeping in mind its perception. Findings Section one examines the cognitive processes and self-assessment mechanisms that set lonely individuals apart from their non-lonely counterparts. These include heightened awareness, negative social cue interpretation and increased sensitivity to social threats. Section two examines the predictors of loneliness and associated emotional responses. This includes factors such as emotional responses, attributions, duration and situational variables. Section three challenges conventional definitions of loneliness by introducing social asymmetry. Within this framework, personality traits such as extraversion emerge as resilient against loneliness, even in social isolation. Section four discusses the significant influence of cultural diversity on perceptions of loneliness. Collectivist cultures rely on familial and community support to combat loneliness, whereas individualistic cultures require interventions that promote independence. Originality/value This comprehensive examination contributes insights for informing targeted interventions, reinforcing support systems and enhancing our understanding of human connectivity in an increasingly isolated world.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解感知到的孤独:一种多方面的方法
设计/方法/途径 据笔者所知,这似乎是第一篇以孤独感为主要研究主题的论文。遗憾的是,关于这一特定主题的研究成果并不多。不过,可以综合各种方面和维度来加深理解。因此,作者精心挑选了四个部分,分别侧重于孤独感的不同方面。第一部分研究了使孤独者有别于非孤独者的认知过程和自我评估机制。这些机制包括增强意识、对负面社会线索的解释以及对社会威胁的敏感性。第二部分研究孤独感的预测因素和相关情绪反应。这包括情绪反应、归因、持续时间和情境变量等因素。第三部分通过引入社会不对称来挑战孤独感的传统定义。在这一框架内,性格特征(如外向性)即使在社会隔离的情况下也能抵御孤独。第四部分讨论了文化多样性对孤独感的重要影响。集体主义文化依赖家庭和社区的支持来消除孤独感,而个人主义文化则需要促进独立性的干预措施。原创性/价值这项全面的研究为有针对性的干预措施、加强支持系统以及加深我们对日益孤立的世界中人类联系的理解提供了真知灼见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Student perceptions of post-pandemic university learning: challenges and benefits Student perceptions of post-pandemic university learning: challenges and benefits Mental health and positive introversion: a positive autoethnographic case study of Mark Weeks Mental health and positive introversion: a positive autoethnographic case study of Mark Weeks “The urge to tell and its consequences”: women’s memoirs of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1