Explaining how Wikipedia deals with credibility to university students: the case of Wikipedia in the Basque language

E. Bidegain, Txema Egaña, Aitor Zuberogoitia
{"title":"Explaining how Wikipedia deals with credibility to university students: the case of Wikipedia in the Basque language","authors":"E. Bidegain, Txema Egaña, Aitor Zuberogoitia","doi":"10.1108/jices-08-2023-0104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to analyse how first-year undergraduate audiovisual communication students assess the credibility and reliability of information on Wikipedia in Basque and analyse whether the experience of being a Wikipedia editor helps to improve students’ perceptions of Wikipedia’s trustworthiness. The purpose of this project was to help students to better understand the credibility mechanisms of Wikipedia in Basque regarding the work of editing and creating entries. Do students’ perceptions about how reliable Wikipedia is change if they receive training as Wikipedia content editors and understand Wikipedia’s credibility mechanisms? What are their perceptions about the credibility of Wikipedia?\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors observed and analysed students’ behaviour and perceptions when creating Wikipedia articles and learning about the process of evaluating Wikipedia. This research was carried out at [masked for review] over four consecutive years, where 188 students in the Degree Programme in Audiovisual Communication participated through a questionnaire and in-depth interviews.\n\n\nFindings\nAfter the experience of creating content on Wikipedia and learning about Wikipedia’s credibility mechanisms experientially, the majority of students reported that their perception of Wikipedia’s credibility had increased, and 70% of students believed Wikipedia to be reliable or more reliable than expected. A smaller number of students stated that understanding Wikipedia’s editing processes decreased their perception of Wikipedia’s credibility.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis project will lead to a better understanding of the performance of students in editing content on Wikipedia and of the impact that this editing experience has on students’ perceptions of credibility with respect to Wikipedia. It will make it possible to better incorporate Wikipedia content editing into the learning processes of students and citizens. This study provides interesting keys to improving the reliability and credibility of Wikipedia among students.\n\n\nSocial implications\nAs the study examined Basque Wikipedia, it has important social implications since Basque is a minority language and Wikipedia is the main sources of information for students who study in Basque.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe authors have been analysing the credibility of information in general and that of information on Wikipedia in particular since 2010. Based on this experience, the authors decided to design this study so that it was carried out while the students were creating and editing Wikipedia content as part of a project in their educational curriculum. Furthermore, the study expands the body of research carried out to date by incorporating the perspectives of media studies students.\n","PeriodicalId":186016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society","volume":"1 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-08-2023-0104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to analyse how first-year undergraduate audiovisual communication students assess the credibility and reliability of information on Wikipedia in Basque and analyse whether the experience of being a Wikipedia editor helps to improve students’ perceptions of Wikipedia’s trustworthiness. The purpose of this project was to help students to better understand the credibility mechanisms of Wikipedia in Basque regarding the work of editing and creating entries. Do students’ perceptions about how reliable Wikipedia is change if they receive training as Wikipedia content editors and understand Wikipedia’s credibility mechanisms? What are their perceptions about the credibility of Wikipedia? Design/methodology/approach The authors observed and analysed students’ behaviour and perceptions when creating Wikipedia articles and learning about the process of evaluating Wikipedia. This research was carried out at [masked for review] over four consecutive years, where 188 students in the Degree Programme in Audiovisual Communication participated through a questionnaire and in-depth interviews. Findings After the experience of creating content on Wikipedia and learning about Wikipedia’s credibility mechanisms experientially, the majority of students reported that their perception of Wikipedia’s credibility had increased, and 70% of students believed Wikipedia to be reliable or more reliable than expected. A smaller number of students stated that understanding Wikipedia’s editing processes decreased their perception of Wikipedia’s credibility. Practical implications This project will lead to a better understanding of the performance of students in editing content on Wikipedia and of the impact that this editing experience has on students’ perceptions of credibility with respect to Wikipedia. It will make it possible to better incorporate Wikipedia content editing into the learning processes of students and citizens. This study provides interesting keys to improving the reliability and credibility of Wikipedia among students. Social implications As the study examined Basque Wikipedia, it has important social implications since Basque is a minority language and Wikipedia is the main sources of information for students who study in Basque. Originality/value The authors have been analysing the credibility of information in general and that of information on Wikipedia in particular since 2010. Based on this experience, the authors decided to design this study so that it was carried out while the students were creating and editing Wikipedia content as part of a project in their educational curriculum. Furthermore, the study expands the body of research carried out to date by incorporating the perspectives of media studies students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
向大学生解释维基百科如何处理可信度问题:巴斯克语维基百科案例
目的 本研究旨在分析视听传播专业一年级本科生如何评估巴斯克语维基百科上信息的可信度和可靠性,并分析担任维基百科编辑的经历是否有助于改善学生对维基百科可信度的看法。本项目的目的是帮助学生更好地了解巴斯克语维基百科在编辑和创建词条方面的可信度机制。如果学生接受维基百科内容编辑培训并了解维基百科的可信度机制,他们对维基百科可信度的看法是否会改变?他们对维基百科可信度的看法如何?作者观察并分析了学生在创建维基百科文章和学习维基百科评估过程中的行为和看法。研究结果在经历了在维基百科上创建内容和学习维基百科可信度机制的体验后,大多数学生表示他们对维基百科可信度的看法有所提高,70%的学生认为维基百科是可靠的或比预期的更可靠。该项目将有助于更好地了解学生在编辑维基百科内容时的表现,以及这种编辑经历对学生对维基百科可信度的看法所产生的影响。这将使维基百科内容编辑更好地融入学生和公民的学习过程成为可能。本研究为提高维基百科在学生中的可靠性和可信度提供了有趣的关键。社会影响由于本研究考察的是巴斯克维基百科,因此具有重要的社会影响,因为巴斯克语是一种少数民族语言,而维基百科是学习巴斯克语的学生的主要信息来源。原创性/价值作者自 2010 年以来一直在分析一般信息的可信度,特别是维基百科上信息的可信度。基于这一经验,作者决定在学生们创建和编辑维基百科内容时开展本研究,作为其教育课程项目的一部分。此外,本研究还纳入了媒体研究专业学生的观点,从而扩展了迄今为止的研究范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examining ChatGPT adoption among educators in higher educational institutions using extended UTAUT model Unmasking user vulnerability: investigating the barriers to overcoming dark patterns in e-commerce using TISM and MICMAC analysis Rumours. Who believes them? Responsible living labs: what can go wrong? Editorial: the dark side of blockchains: threats, risks, ethics and biases in blockchain adoption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1