Procedure for evaluation of LNG CCS with reference vessel using nonlinear dynamic analysis

Joongyu Kim, Yooil Kim
{"title":"Procedure for evaluation of LNG CCS with reference vessel using nonlinear dynamic analysis","authors":"Joongyu Kim, Yooil Kim","doi":"10.1177/14750902231226160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a procedure for evaluating the structural safety of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Cargo Containment System (CCS) against sloshing load by comparing the results of linear and nonlinear dynamic structural strength analysis with those of verified reference vessels. This comparative procedure indirectly considers (1) limitation of implementing real physical phenomena in model experiments including the Froude scaling method, density ratio, etc., (2) assumptions in statistical analysis for calculating design loads, and (3) complicated effects not implemented in nonlinear dynamic analysis such as phase transition between liquid and gas, hull deflection, and the detailed geometry of the CCS, among others. The uncertainties in sloshing model experiments and statistical analysis can be addressed by introducing the pressure correction factors, which make the linear design loads of the reference vessel satisfy the CCS’s capacity. Finally, the structural nonlinearity, which was not accounted for in the nonlinear dynamic analysis, can be taken into consideration through a comparison of the usage factors from nonlinear dynamic analysis. To apply the proposed structural assessment procedure, the GTT NO96 series were selected and applied to two failure modes. In the application of this procedure, the Triangular Impulse Response Function (TIRF) method was adopted, to efficiently calculate numerous linear dynamic structural strength analyses required for Dynamic Amplification Factor (DAF). Through this application applying larger sloshing loads to the reinforced NO96 CCS of the target vessel compared to the reference vessel, the feasibility of this procedure was shown.","PeriodicalId":20667,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14750902231226160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MARINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a procedure for evaluating the structural safety of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Cargo Containment System (CCS) against sloshing load by comparing the results of linear and nonlinear dynamic structural strength analysis with those of verified reference vessels. This comparative procedure indirectly considers (1) limitation of implementing real physical phenomena in model experiments including the Froude scaling method, density ratio, etc., (2) assumptions in statistical analysis for calculating design loads, and (3) complicated effects not implemented in nonlinear dynamic analysis such as phase transition between liquid and gas, hull deflection, and the detailed geometry of the CCS, among others. The uncertainties in sloshing model experiments and statistical analysis can be addressed by introducing the pressure correction factors, which make the linear design loads of the reference vessel satisfy the CCS’s capacity. Finally, the structural nonlinearity, which was not accounted for in the nonlinear dynamic analysis, can be taken into consideration through a comparison of the usage factors from nonlinear dynamic analysis. To apply the proposed structural assessment procedure, the GTT NO96 series were selected and applied to two failure modes. In the application of this procedure, the Triangular Impulse Response Function (TIRF) method was adopted, to efficiently calculate numerous linear dynamic structural strength analyses required for Dynamic Amplification Factor (DAF). Through this application applying larger sloshing loads to the reinforced NO96 CCS of the target vessel compared to the reference vessel, the feasibility of this procedure was shown.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用非线性动态分析对配有参照船的液化天然气 CCS 进行评估的程序
本文通过比较线性和非线性动态结构强度分析结果与经过验证的参照船的结果,提出了一种评估液化天然气(LNG)货物围护系统(CCS)结构安全性的程序。这种比较程序间接考虑了:(1)在模型实验中实施真实物理现象的限制,包括弗劳德缩放法、密度比等;(2)计算设计荷载的统计分析假设;(3)非线性动态分析中未实施的复杂效应,如液体和气体之间的相变、船体挠度和 CCS 的详细几何形状等。可以通过引入压力修正系数来解决荡气模型试验和统计分析中的不确定性,从而使参考船的线性设计载荷满足 CCS 的承载能力。最后,通过比较非线性动态分析中的使用系数,可以考虑非线性动态分析中未考虑的结构非线性因素。为了应用建议的结构评估程序,我们选择了 GTT NO96 系列,并将其应用于两种失效模式。在应用该程序时,采用了三角脉冲响应函数(TIRF)方法,以有效计算动态放大系数(DAF)所需的大量线性动态结构强度分析。通过对目标船的强化 NO96 CCS 施加比参照船更大的坍塌载荷,证明了该程序的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
77
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment is concerned with the design, production and operation of engineering artefacts for the maritime environment. The journal straddles the traditional boundaries of naval architecture, marine engineering, offshore/ocean engineering, coastal engineering and port engineering.
期刊最新文献
Integrated design method for protection against vibration of offshore platform plate structure A grouping module assessment method for ocean engineering systems: Subsea tree system as a case Effect of pre-swirl stator angles on broadband noise considering hydrodynamic performance of pump-jet propeller Effect of preload scatter on fatigue life of subsea pipeline connector bolts located at suspended span section A benchmark study on the energy efficiency and environmental impacts of alternative fuels in gulet-type sailing yachts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1