“We Try [to] Take the Barriers Away For You to Come in”: Active Recreation Contexts as Leisure Facilitators

IF 0.7 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Journal of Park and Recreation Administration Pub Date : 2024-01-26 DOI:10.18666/jpra-2024-12122
Jennifer P. Agans, Sammie L. Powers, Megan K. McCabe, J. S. Son
{"title":"“We Try [to] Take the Barriers Away For You to Come in”: Active Recreation Contexts as Leisure Facilitators","authors":"Jennifer P. Agans, Sammie L. Powers, Megan K. McCabe, J. S. Son","doi":"10.18666/jpra-2024-12122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Active recreation spaces provide important contexts for physical activity that can contribute to positive physical and mental health outcomes. However, individuals often face constraints which can limit their participation in active recreation. Although some constraints can be negotiated at the individual level, organizations may also take actions to facilitate participation. Extensive research has examined individual constraints to active recreation and constraint negotiation strategies, but there is a lack of research on how recreation agencies and organizations work to facilitate participation in active recreation. Recognizing this gap, we sought to understand facilitators of physically active recreation at the contextual level, with a larger goal of identifying the organizational facilitators that recreation providers use to encourage participation. This qualitative study of recreation providers included semi-structured focus groups conducted online with staff and program leaders at recreation organizations providing physically active programming in a college town in the northeastern United States. Focus groups were transcribed verbatim, coded both deductively and inductively using thematic analysis, and validated with qualitative techniques (e.g., consensus across coders). Results aligned with four themes: philosophy/culture, staff/volunteers, marketing, and program actions. These themes illustrate the actions taken by providers to encourage and support participation across various levels of their organizational operations. Our data provide evidence of specific facilitation strategies used by recreation providers, aligning with constraints and constraint negotiation strategies identified in previous research, as well as with business practices not typically viewed through this lens. The present study highlights the need for better integration of individual- and organizational-level research. By better understanding constraints faced by current and potential participants, providers can be more intentional in aligning their practices with the facilitation of participation. Recreation providers can use the facilitation strategies identified in this study to support constraint negotiation and better enable engagement in active recreation.","PeriodicalId":46684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Park and Recreation Administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Park and Recreation Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18666/jpra-2024-12122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Active recreation spaces provide important contexts for physical activity that can contribute to positive physical and mental health outcomes. However, individuals often face constraints which can limit their participation in active recreation. Although some constraints can be negotiated at the individual level, organizations may also take actions to facilitate participation. Extensive research has examined individual constraints to active recreation and constraint negotiation strategies, but there is a lack of research on how recreation agencies and organizations work to facilitate participation in active recreation. Recognizing this gap, we sought to understand facilitators of physically active recreation at the contextual level, with a larger goal of identifying the organizational facilitators that recreation providers use to encourage participation. This qualitative study of recreation providers included semi-structured focus groups conducted online with staff and program leaders at recreation organizations providing physically active programming in a college town in the northeastern United States. Focus groups were transcribed verbatim, coded both deductively and inductively using thematic analysis, and validated with qualitative techniques (e.g., consensus across coders). Results aligned with four themes: philosophy/culture, staff/volunteers, marketing, and program actions. These themes illustrate the actions taken by providers to encourage and support participation across various levels of their organizational operations. Our data provide evidence of specific facilitation strategies used by recreation providers, aligning with constraints and constraint negotiation strategies identified in previous research, as well as with business practices not typically viewed through this lens. The present study highlights the need for better integration of individual- and organizational-level research. By better understanding constraints faced by current and potential participants, providers can be more intentional in aligning their practices with the facilitation of participation. Recreation providers can use the facilitation strategies identified in this study to support constraint negotiation and better enable engagement in active recreation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"我们努力为你的到来扫除障碍":作为休闲促进因素的积极娱乐环境
积极的娱乐空间为体育活动提供了重要的环境,有助于取得积极的身心健康成果。然而,个人往往面临各种制约因素,这些因素可能会限制他们参与积极的娱乐活动。虽然有些制约因素可以在个人层面上协商解决,但组织也可以采取行动来促进参与。已有大量研究探讨了个人参与积极娱乐活动的限制因素以及限制因素的协商策略,但缺乏对娱乐机构和组织如何促进参与积极娱乐活动的研究。认识到这一差距后,我们试图从环境层面了解积极参加体育娱乐活动的促进因素,其更大的目标是确定娱乐提供者用于鼓励参与的组织促进因素。这项针对娱乐提供者的定性研究包括半结构式焦点小组,通过网络与美国东北部一个大学城提供体育锻炼项目的娱乐组织的员工和项目负责人进行了交流。对焦点小组进行了逐字记录,使用主题分析法进行了演绎和归纳编码,并使用定性技术进行了验证(例如,编码者之间达成共识)。结果与四个主题相一致:理念/文化、员工/志愿者、市场营销和计划行动。这些主题说明了医疗服务提供者在其组织运作的各个层面为鼓励和支持参与而采取的行动。我们的数据提供了娱乐服务提供者所使用的特定促进策略的证据,这些策略与以往研究中确定的制约因素和制约因素协商策略以及通常不从这一角度看待的商业实践相一致。本研究强调了更好地整合个人和组织层面研究的必要性。通过更好地了解当前和潜在参与者所面临的制约因素,提供者可以更有意识地调整他们的做法,以促进参与。娱乐服务提供者可以利用本研究中确定的促进策略来支持制约因素的协商,并更好地促进参与积极的娱乐活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Park and Recreation Administration
Journal of Park and Recreation Administration HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
23.10%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
The Management of Parks and Public Spaces in the Context of Unsheltered Homelessness: Perspectives from Three Key Stakeholder Groups Classifying Rural Parks: A Case Study in Iowa A Study of Parents’ Perceived Constraints on Participating in Outdoor Leisure Activities with Their Children in Japan Community-University Partnerships: The Benefits of Collaboration in Measuring Public Support for a Community Recreation Center s Recreation Part of the Story? Stakeholders’ Narratives about Youth Retention in a Rural State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1