Investigating Science Teachers’ Nature of Science Conceptions and Argumentation in a Science Methods Course

IF 3.4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Science & Education Pub Date : 2024-01-26 DOI:10.1007/s11191-024-00498-z
Rola Khishfe
{"title":"Investigating Science Teachers’ Nature of Science Conceptions and Argumentation in a Science Methods Course","authors":"Rola Khishfe","doi":"10.1007/s11191-024-00498-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study examined preservice teachers’ development in conceptions of NOS and their argumentation components using an explicit approach that targets NOS and argumentation. Participants were 20 preservice elementary teachers enrolled in a science methods course emphasizing explicit instruction of NOS and argumentation through various hands-on activities covering scientific and socioscientific contexts. Data were gathered through pre-/post context-specific questionnaires followed by semi-structured interviews. Results showed substantial improvements in participants’ conceptions of NOS and argumentation components. Notably, NOS comprehension showed a more pronounced enhancement in scientific contexts compared to socioscientific ones, while both contexts displayed developments in argumentation, slightly more so within scientific contexts. The results were interpreted taking into account the following issues: explicit approach for NOS and argumentation, connected approach to teach NOS and argumentation, and scientific vs. socioscientific contexts. Implications concerning NOS and argumentation pedagogy were discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":771,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"34 3","pages":"1223 - 1247"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-024-00498-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study examined preservice teachers’ development in conceptions of NOS and their argumentation components using an explicit approach that targets NOS and argumentation. Participants were 20 preservice elementary teachers enrolled in a science methods course emphasizing explicit instruction of NOS and argumentation through various hands-on activities covering scientific and socioscientific contexts. Data were gathered through pre-/post context-specific questionnaires followed by semi-structured interviews. Results showed substantial improvements in participants’ conceptions of NOS and argumentation components. Notably, NOS comprehension showed a more pronounced enhancement in scientific contexts compared to socioscientific ones, while both contexts displayed developments in argumentation, slightly more so within scientific contexts. The results were interpreted taking into account the following issues: explicit approach for NOS and argumentation, connected approach to teach NOS and argumentation, and scientific vs. socioscientific contexts. Implications concerning NOS and argumentation pedagogy were discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查科学教师在科学方法课程中的科学本质概念和论证方法
本研究考察了职前教师在NOS概念及其论证成分方面的发展,采用了一种明确的方法,以NOS和论证为目标。参与者是20名职前小学教师,他们参加了一门科学方法课程,强调通过科学和社会科学背景下的各种实践活动来明确指导NOS和论证。数据是通过前后特定情境的问卷调查和半结构化访谈收集的。结果显示,参与者对NOS和辩论成分的概念有了实质性的改善。值得注意的是,与社会科学语境相比,NOS理解在科学语境中表现出更明显的增强,而两种语境都表现出在论证方面的发展,在科学语境中表现得稍微更好。对结果的解释考虑了以下问题:NOS和论证的明确方法,NOS和论证的关联方法,以及科学与社会科学背景。讨论了NOS和论证教学法的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science & Education
Science & Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Science Education publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. In addition to original articles, the journal features the following special sections: -Learning : consisting of theoretical and empirical research studies on learning of science. We invite manuscripts that investigate learning and its change and growth from various lenses, including psychological, social, cognitive, sociohistorical, and affective. Studies examining the relationship of learning to teaching, the science knowledge and practices, the learners themselves, and the contexts (social, political, physical, ideological, institutional, epistemological, and cultural) are similarly welcome. -Issues and Trends : consisting primarily of analytical, interpretive, or persuasive essays on current educational, social, or philosophical issues and trends relevant to the teaching of science. This special section particularly seeks to promote informed dialogues about current issues in science education, and carefully reasoned papers representing disparate viewpoints are welcomed. Manuscripts submitted for this section may be in the form of a position paper, a polemical piece, or a creative commentary. -Science Learning in Everyday Life : consisting of analytical, interpretative, or philosophical papers regarding learning science outside of the formal classroom. Papers should investigate experiences in settings such as community, home, the Internet, after school settings, museums, and other opportunities that develop science interest, knowledge or practices across the life span. Attention to issues and factors relating to equity in science learning are especially encouraged.. -Science Teacher Education [...]
期刊最新文献
List of Reviewers—2025 Editorial Note: February 2026 Issue Information Issue Information Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1