{"title":"Investigating Science Teachers’ Nature of Science Conceptions and Argumentation in a Science Methods Course","authors":"Rola Khishfe","doi":"10.1007/s11191-024-00498-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study examined preservice teachers’ development in conceptions of NOS and their argumentation components using an explicit approach that targets NOS and argumentation. Participants were 20 preservice elementary teachers enrolled in a science methods course emphasizing explicit instruction of NOS and argumentation through various hands-on activities covering scientific and socioscientific contexts. Data were gathered through pre-/post context-specific questionnaires followed by semi-structured interviews. Results showed substantial improvements in participants’ conceptions of NOS and argumentation components. Notably, NOS comprehension showed a more pronounced enhancement in scientific contexts compared to socioscientific ones, while both contexts displayed developments in argumentation, slightly more so within scientific contexts. The results were interpreted taking into account the following issues: explicit approach for NOS and argumentation, connected approach to teach NOS and argumentation, and scientific vs. socioscientific contexts. Implications concerning NOS and argumentation pedagogy were discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":771,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"34 3","pages":"1223 - 1247"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-024-00498-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The study examined preservice teachers’ development in conceptions of NOS and their argumentation components using an explicit approach that targets NOS and argumentation. Participants were 20 preservice elementary teachers enrolled in a science methods course emphasizing explicit instruction of NOS and argumentation through various hands-on activities covering scientific and socioscientific contexts. Data were gathered through pre-/post context-specific questionnaires followed by semi-structured interviews. Results showed substantial improvements in participants’ conceptions of NOS and argumentation components. Notably, NOS comprehension showed a more pronounced enhancement in scientific contexts compared to socioscientific ones, while both contexts displayed developments in argumentation, slightly more so within scientific contexts. The results were interpreted taking into account the following issues: explicit approach for NOS and argumentation, connected approach to teach NOS and argumentation, and scientific vs. socioscientific contexts. Implications concerning NOS and argumentation pedagogy were discussed.
期刊介绍:
Science Education publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. In addition to original articles, the journal features the following special sections: -Learning : consisting of theoretical and empirical research studies on learning of science. We invite manuscripts that investigate learning and its change and growth from various lenses, including psychological, social, cognitive, sociohistorical, and affective. Studies examining the relationship of learning to teaching, the science knowledge and practices, the learners themselves, and the contexts (social, political, physical, ideological, institutional, epistemological, and cultural) are similarly welcome. -Issues and Trends : consisting primarily of analytical, interpretive, or persuasive essays on current educational, social, or philosophical issues and trends relevant to the teaching of science. This special section particularly seeks to promote informed dialogues about current issues in science education, and carefully reasoned papers representing disparate viewpoints are welcomed. Manuscripts submitted for this section may be in the form of a position paper, a polemical piece, or a creative commentary. -Science Learning in Everyday Life : consisting of analytical, interpretative, or philosophical papers regarding learning science outside of the formal classroom. Papers should investigate experiences in settings such as community, home, the Internet, after school settings, museums, and other opportunities that develop science interest, knowledge or practices across the life span. Attention to issues and factors relating to equity in science learning are especially encouraged.. -Science Teacher Education [...]