Work it baby! A survey study to investigate the role of underaged children and privacy management strategies within parent influencer content

Emma Beuckels, L. Hudders, I. Vanwesenbeeck, Elisabeth Van den Abeele
{"title":"Work it baby! A survey study to investigate the role of underaged children and privacy management strategies within parent influencer content","authors":"Emma Beuckels, L. Hudders, I. Vanwesenbeeck, Elisabeth Van den Abeele","doi":"10.1177/14614448231218992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, parents are increasingly drawn to establish a successful influencer status on social media. Being a parent influencer offers an alluring work environment, allowing them to combine devotion to their children and generating a considerable income. However, both scholars and policymakers raise significant concerns regarding the orchestrated and monetized nature of influencer sharenting, which involves sharing children’s personal information online. The present study, which surveyed 89 parent influencers from Belgium and The Netherlands, shows that children are omnipresent in their parents’ influencer content. The findings do not only uncover the underlying motivations driving influencer sharenting, but also reveal a low sharenting risk awareness. Building on parent influencers’ safe sharenting strategies, this study identifies three parent influencer types: reckless, safe, and authoritarian safe sharenters. This classification contributes to a better understanding of the heterogeneity of the parent influencer landscape and will foster the development of protective measures in favor of children’s wellbeing.","PeriodicalId":508039,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"50 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Media & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231218992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nowadays, parents are increasingly drawn to establish a successful influencer status on social media. Being a parent influencer offers an alluring work environment, allowing them to combine devotion to their children and generating a considerable income. However, both scholars and policymakers raise significant concerns regarding the orchestrated and monetized nature of influencer sharenting, which involves sharing children’s personal information online. The present study, which surveyed 89 parent influencers from Belgium and The Netherlands, shows that children are omnipresent in their parents’ influencer content. The findings do not only uncover the underlying motivations driving influencer sharenting, but also reveal a low sharenting risk awareness. Building on parent influencers’ safe sharenting strategies, this study identifies three parent influencer types: reckless, safe, and authoritarian safe sharenters. This classification contributes to a better understanding of the heterogeneity of the parent influencer landscape and will foster the development of protective measures in favor of children’s wellbeing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作吧宝贝一项调查研究,旨在了解未成年儿童的作用以及家长影响者内容中的隐私管理策略
如今,越来越多的家长希望在社交媒体上建立成功的影响力。家长影响者提供了一个诱人的工作环境,使他们能够将对子女的奉献与赚取可观的收入结合起来。然而,学者和政策制定者都对 "影响者分享 "的精心策划和货币化性质(涉及在网上分享孩子的个人信息)提出了极大的担忧。本研究调查了来自比利时和荷兰的 89 位父母影响者,结果显示,儿童在父母影响者的内容中无处不在。研究结果不仅揭示了影响者分享的潜在动机,还揭示了分享风险意识的薄弱。在父母影响者安全分享策略的基础上,本研究确定了三种父母影响者类型:鲁莽型、安全型和专制型安全分享者。这种分类有助于更好地了解家长影响者的异质性,并有助于制定有利于儿童福祉的保护措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How to grow a transnational field: A network analysis of the global fact-checking movement How to grow a transnational field: A network analysis of the global fact-checking movement Flagging as a silencing tool: Exploring the relationship between de-platforming of sex and online abuse on Instagram and TikTok Flagging as a silencing tool: Exploring the relationship between de-platforming of sex and online abuse on Instagram and TikTok The politics of tech responsibility: Understanding companies’ responsibility as representative claims
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1