The Optimal Maintained Effective-site Concentration of Propofol under Target-controlled Infusion in Same-day Bidirectional Endoscopy

Chung-Yi Wu, Zhi-Fu Wu, Yi-Hsuan Huang, W. Tseng, Bo-Feng Lin, H. Lai
{"title":"The Optimal Maintained Effective-site Concentration of Propofol under Target-controlled Infusion in Same-day Bidirectional Endoscopy","authors":"Chung-Yi Wu, Zhi-Fu Wu, Yi-Hsuan Huang, W. Tseng, Bo-Feng Lin, H. Lai","doi":"10.4103/jmedsci.jmedsci_8_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The same-day bidirectional endoscopy (BDE) under anesthesia is commonly performed for its efficacy. Until now, the optimal regimen of sedation for same-day BDE is still inconclusive.\n \n \n \n The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the effect-site concentration at loss of consciousness (CeLOC) and maximal maintained Ce (CeM) in patients undergoing sole propofol sedation with the targeted-controlled infusion (TCI) pump and to explore the potential factors for extra fentanyl administration for same-day BDE to improve the quality of anesthesia.\n \n \n \n After excluding the patients with different anesthesiologists/endoscopists and esophagogastroduodenoscopy before colonoscopy, a total of 183 patients receiving BDE with the American Society of Anesthesiologists I to III were enrolled. Anesthesia with TCI of propofol ranged from 2.5 to 5.0 μg/mL was administrated and propofol was increased in steps of 0.5 μg/mL when inadequate or too deep sedation during the procedure. If the sedation level failed to meet satisfaction after two times of Ce increments or CeM achieve 5.0 μg/mL, bolus of fentanyl (25 μg) would be administered. The age, height, weight, gender, CeLOC, CeM, awake Ce, anesthesia time, examination time, frequency of TCI adjustments, total consumption of propofol or fentanyl, incidence of patient movements affecting the procedure, and use of ephedrine or atropine were retrieved from anesthetic charts and electronic medical record was recorded and the factors affecting the extra bolus of fentanyl or CeM were calculated.\n \n \n \n One hundred and fifty-seven patients underwent procedures with only propofol sedation and 26 patients with additional fentanyl bolus 25 μg. There were three patients with hypotension, bradycardia, and transient hypoxemia in only propofol sedation, respectively. The incidence of patient movements affecting the procedure was 36.6% (67/183), 41 patients completed the procedure after increasing propofol Ce, and 26 patients required an extra bolus of fentanyl. After linear regression, the optimal formula was CeM = 1.9–(0.006 × age) + 0.658 × CeLOC. After controlling for confounding covariates, only CeLOC was the most informative covariate for the demand for fentanyl. Finally, we simplified the formula as propofol CeM = CeLOC + 0.7 μg/mL to avoid patient movements affecting the procedure and adverse effects.\n \n \n \n We showed that the age and CeLOC were associated with CeM and only higher CeLOC (>4.5 μg/mL) was the only contributing factor for the extra bolus of fentanyl in BDE. We also provided the simplified formula as propofol CeM = CeLOC + 0.7 μg/mL to avoid patient movements affecting the procedure and adverse effects.\n","PeriodicalId":16486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"119 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmedsci.jmedsci_8_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The same-day bidirectional endoscopy (BDE) under anesthesia is commonly performed for its efficacy. Until now, the optimal regimen of sedation for same-day BDE is still inconclusive. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the effect-site concentration at loss of consciousness (CeLOC) and maximal maintained Ce (CeM) in patients undergoing sole propofol sedation with the targeted-controlled infusion (TCI) pump and to explore the potential factors for extra fentanyl administration for same-day BDE to improve the quality of anesthesia. After excluding the patients with different anesthesiologists/endoscopists and esophagogastroduodenoscopy before colonoscopy, a total of 183 patients receiving BDE with the American Society of Anesthesiologists I to III were enrolled. Anesthesia with TCI of propofol ranged from 2.5 to 5.0 μg/mL was administrated and propofol was increased in steps of 0.5 μg/mL when inadequate or too deep sedation during the procedure. If the sedation level failed to meet satisfaction after two times of Ce increments or CeM achieve 5.0 μg/mL, bolus of fentanyl (25 μg) would be administered. The age, height, weight, gender, CeLOC, CeM, awake Ce, anesthesia time, examination time, frequency of TCI adjustments, total consumption of propofol or fentanyl, incidence of patient movements affecting the procedure, and use of ephedrine or atropine were retrieved from anesthetic charts and electronic medical record was recorded and the factors affecting the extra bolus of fentanyl or CeM were calculated. One hundred and fifty-seven patients underwent procedures with only propofol sedation and 26 patients with additional fentanyl bolus 25 μg. There were three patients with hypotension, bradycardia, and transient hypoxemia in only propofol sedation, respectively. The incidence of patient movements affecting the procedure was 36.6% (67/183), 41 patients completed the procedure after increasing propofol Ce, and 26 patients required an extra bolus of fentanyl. After linear regression, the optimal formula was CeM = 1.9–(0.006 × age) + 0.658 × CeLOC. After controlling for confounding covariates, only CeLOC was the most informative covariate for the demand for fentanyl. Finally, we simplified the formula as propofol CeM = CeLOC + 0.7 μg/mL to avoid patient movements affecting the procedure and adverse effects. We showed that the age and CeLOC were associated with CeM and only higher CeLOC (>4.5 μg/mL) was the only contributing factor for the extra bolus of fentanyl in BDE. We also provided the simplified formula as propofol CeM = CeLOC + 0.7 μg/mL to avoid patient movements affecting the procedure and adverse effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当日双向内窥镜检查中目标控制输注的最佳丙泊酚有效部位维持浓度
麻醉下的当日双向内窥镜检查(BDE)因其疗效显著而被广泛采用。迄今为止,当日双向内窥镜检查的最佳镇静方案仍无定论。 本研究旨在探讨使用靶向控制输注(TCI)泵接受单纯异丙酚镇静的患者在意识丧失时的效应部位浓度(CeLOC)与最大维持Ce(CeM)之间的关系,并探索在当日BDE中额外使用芬太尼以提高麻醉质量的潜在因素。 在排除不同麻醉师/内镜医师和结肠镜检查前进行食管胃十二指肠镜检查的患者后,共有 183 名接受美国麻醉医师协会 I 至 III 级 BDE 的患者入选。使用 2.5 至 5.0 μg/mL 的异丙酚 TCI 进行麻醉,如果手术过程中镇静不足或过深,则以 0.5 μg/mL 为单位增加异丙酚。如果镇静水平在两次Ce递增或CeM达到5.0 μg/mL后仍不能令人满意,则会注射芬太尼(25 μg)。从麻醉病历和电子病历中提取年龄、身高、体重、性别、CeLOC、CeM、清醒Ce、麻醉时间、检查时间、TCI调整频率、丙泊酚或芬太尼总消耗量、影响手术过程的患者移动发生率、麻黄碱或阿托品的使用情况等数据,并计算影响额外栓注芬太尼或CeM的因素。 157例患者仅使用异丙酚镇静,26例患者额外使用了25微克芬太尼。在仅使用异丙酚镇静的情况下,分别有 3 名患者出现低血压、心动过缓和一过性低氧血症。影响手术过程的患者移动发生率为 36.6%(67/183),41 名患者在增加异丙酚 Ce 后完成了手术,26 名患者需要额外注射芬太尼。经过线性回归,最佳公式为 CeM = 1.9-(0.006 × 年龄) + 0.658 × CeLOC。在控制了混杂协变量后,只有 CeLOC 是对芬太尼需求量最有参考价值的协变量。最后,我们将公式简化为丙泊酚 CeM = CeLOC + 0.7 μg/mL,以避免患者移动影响手术过程和不良反应。 我们的研究表明,年龄和 CeLOC 与 CeM 相关,只有较高的 CeLOC(>4.5 μg/mL)才是 BDE 中额外栓注芬太尼的唯一因素。我们还提供了简化公式,即丙泊酚 CeM = CeLOC + 0.7 μg/mL,以避免患者移动影响手术过程和不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Self-expanding, Large-caliber Ureteral Stent Applied for Bilateral Long-segment Ureteral Strictures — A Case Report A Case Report of Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Pericardiectomy for Postpericardiotomy Recurrent Loculated Pericardial Effusion Dynamics of Urine Electrolytes in Term Neonates during the 1st Week of Life Extreme Delta Brush Electroencephalography Pattern in Anti-yo Encephalitis: A Case Report An Alternative Way to Manage Intraoperative Tear of Cuff Inflation Line of the Endotracheal Tube during Ophthalmic Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1