Interaction Effects between Intentional Poison, Suicide Attempts, Psychological Disorders, and Gender Using Log-linear Models Approach

Yousef Veisani, Maryam Kheiry, Hojjat Sayyadi, Ghobad Moradi
{"title":"Interaction Effects between Intentional Poison, Suicide Attempts,\nPsychological Disorders, and Gender Using Log-linear Models\nApproach","authors":"Yousef Veisani, Maryam Kheiry, Hojjat Sayyadi, Ghobad Moradi","doi":"10.2174/0126660822270224231220063420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nBased on research evidence, intentional poisoning has a relatively\nhigh prevalence among people with psychiatric disorders, and the diagnosis of psychological\ndisorders can be an important predictor of suicide attempts and their recurrence. Gender\npresents a determinant in the occurrence of psychiatric conditions and suicidal behaviors.\n\n\n\nThis study aimed to investigate the relationship between suicide attempts, psychiatric\ndisorders, and gender in individuals hospitalized due to intentional poisoning.\n\n\n\nThis study used the data obtained from the disease registration program based on\nthe data of the patients hospitalized due to intentional poisoning during a two-year followup\n(2021-2022), including a total of 658 patients. In this study, log-linear models were\nused to assess the relationships between the main variables that independently entered the\nmodel. The outputs of the log-linear model we reanalyzed as independent, two-way, threeway,\nand saturated models using relevant fit indices. Finally, the results of the best model\nwere presented.\n\n\n\nBased on the conditional values retrieved from the final model, the risk of intentional\npoisoning was lower in women than in men after adjusting for the variables of a history\nof suicide attempts and the results of psychological assessment (OR=0.25, 95% CI:\n0.16-0.37, p = < 0.001). The risk of suicide attempts in women suffering from underlying\npsychiatric disorders (OR=1.57, 95% CI: 0.81-2.99, p = 0.188) and in women without underlying\npsychiatric disease, which was not statistically significant (OR=1.07, 95% CI:\n0.47-2.69, p = 0.785). Also, the results showed that the risk of psychiatric disorders in\npeople who had a prior suicide attempt (OR= 1.88, 95% CI: 1.05-2.25, p = < 0.001) and in\nwomen (OR=1.92, 95% CI: 1.05-2.77, p = < 0.001) was statistically significant.\n\n\n\nBased on our findings, men suffering from underlying psychological disorders\nand prior suicide attempts had a higher risk for intentional poisoning. On the other\nhand, among people without a history of suicide attempts and without underlying psychological\ndisorders, the risk of intentional poisoning was higher in women. Moreover, a positive\nhistory of suicide attempts in both genders significantly increases the risk of having a\npsychological disorder. Therefore, it seems that underlying psychological disorders and a\npositive history of suicide attempts render women more vulnerable to intentional poisoning\nthan men. Overall, it is suggested to consider screening for psychological disorders as a\npreventive measure in individuals proven to have intentional poisoning and suicide attempts,\nespecially in men.\n","PeriodicalId":36711,"journal":{"name":"Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126660822270224231220063420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on research evidence, intentional poisoning has a relatively high prevalence among people with psychiatric disorders, and the diagnosis of psychological disorders can be an important predictor of suicide attempts and their recurrence. Gender presents a determinant in the occurrence of psychiatric conditions and suicidal behaviors. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between suicide attempts, psychiatric disorders, and gender in individuals hospitalized due to intentional poisoning. This study used the data obtained from the disease registration program based on the data of the patients hospitalized due to intentional poisoning during a two-year followup (2021-2022), including a total of 658 patients. In this study, log-linear models were used to assess the relationships between the main variables that independently entered the model. The outputs of the log-linear model we reanalyzed as independent, two-way, threeway, and saturated models using relevant fit indices. Finally, the results of the best model were presented. Based on the conditional values retrieved from the final model, the risk of intentional poisoning was lower in women than in men after adjusting for the variables of a history of suicide attempts and the results of psychological assessment (OR=0.25, 95% CI: 0.16-0.37, p = < 0.001). The risk of suicide attempts in women suffering from underlying psychiatric disorders (OR=1.57, 95% CI: 0.81-2.99, p = 0.188) and in women without underlying psychiatric disease, which was not statistically significant (OR=1.07, 95% CI: 0.47-2.69, p = 0.785). Also, the results showed that the risk of psychiatric disorders in people who had a prior suicide attempt (OR= 1.88, 95% CI: 1.05-2.25, p = < 0.001) and in women (OR=1.92, 95% CI: 1.05-2.77, p = < 0.001) was statistically significant. Based on our findings, men suffering from underlying psychological disorders and prior suicide attempts had a higher risk for intentional poisoning. On the other hand, among people without a history of suicide attempts and without underlying psychological disorders, the risk of intentional poisoning was higher in women. Moreover, a positive history of suicide attempts in both genders significantly increases the risk of having a psychological disorder. Therefore, it seems that underlying psychological disorders and a positive history of suicide attempts render women more vulnerable to intentional poisoning than men. Overall, it is suggested to consider screening for psychological disorders as a preventive measure in individuals proven to have intentional poisoning and suicide attempts, especially in men.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用对数线性模型法分析故意投毒、自杀未遂、心理障碍和性别之间的交互效应
根据研究证据,故意投毒在精神障碍患者中的发生率相对较高,而心理障碍的诊断可能是自杀未遂及其复发的重要预测因素。本研究旨在调查因故意投毒而住院的患者中自杀未遂、精神障碍和性别之间的关系。本研究使用了疾病登记项目中获得的数据,这些数据基于两年随访期间(2021-2022 年)因故意投毒而住院的患者数据,共包括 658 名患者。本研究使用对数线性模型来评估独立进入模型的主要变量之间的关系。我们使用相关的拟合指数将对数线性模型的输出结果重新分析为独立模型、双向模型、三向模型和饱和模型。根据最终模型得出的条件值,在对自杀未遂史和心理评估结果这两个变量进行调整后,女性发生故意投毒的风险低于男性(OR=0.25,95% CI:0.16-0.37,p = <0.001)。患有潜在精神疾病的女性(OR=1.57,95% CI:0.81-2.99,p = 0.188)和无潜在精神疾病的女性自杀未遂的风险没有统计学意义(OR=1.07,95% CI:0.47-2.69,p = 0.785)。此外,研究结果表明,曾有自杀企图的男性(OR=1.88,95% CI:1.05-2.25,P=<0.001)和女性(OR=1.92,95% CI:1.05-2.77,P=<0.001)患精神疾病的风险具有统计学意义。另一方面,在无自杀未遂史且无潜在心理障碍的人群中,女性的故意投毒风险较高。此外,有自杀未遂史的男女都会显著增加患心理障碍的风险。由此看来,潜在的心理障碍和阳性的自杀未遂史使女性比男性更容易受到蓄意投毒的伤害。总之,建议考虑对被证实有故意投毒和自杀企图的人,尤其是男性,进行心理障碍筛查,作为预防措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews
Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊最新文献
The Efficacy of Bibliotherapy in Depression Management: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials Psychosis and Neurosis: Main Differences and Impact on Life The Social Media Mirror: Understanding the Distortion of Eating Habits and Body Image in the Digital Age The Experience of Parents When they Find Out that their Child has Autism: A Phenomenological Study Revolutionizing Psychiatric Care: Unleashing the Potential of Augmented and Virtual Reality for Diagnosis and Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1