Update on the seismogenic potential of the Upper Rhine Graben southern region

Sylvain Michel, C. Duverger, Laurent Bollinger, J. Jara, R. Jolivet
{"title":"Update on the seismogenic potential of the Upper Rhine Graben southern region","authors":"Sylvain Michel, C. Duverger, Laurent Bollinger, J. Jara, R. Jolivet","doi":"10.5194/nhess-24-163-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The Upper Rhine Graben (URG), located in France and Germany, is bordered by north–south-trending faults, some of which are considered active, posing a potential threat to the dense population and infrastructures on the Alsace plain. The largest historical earthquake in the region was the M6.5±0.5 Basel earthquake in 1356. Current seismicity (M>2.5 since 1960) is mostly diffuse and located within the graben. We build upon previous seismic hazard studies of the URG by exploring uncertainties in greater detail and revisiting a number of assumptions. We first take into account the limited evidence of neotectonic activity and then explore tectonic scenarios that have not been taken into account previously, exploring uncertainties for Mmax, its recurrence time, the b value, and the moment released aseismically or through aftershocks. Uncertainties in faults' moment deficit rates, on the observed seismic events' magnitude–frequency distribution and on the moment–area scaling law of earthquakes, are also explored. Assuming a purely dip-slip normal faulting mechanism associated with a simplified model with three main faults, Mmax maximum probability is estimated at Mw 6.1. Considering this scenario, there would be a 99 % probability that Mmax is less than 7.3. In contrast, with a strike-slip assumption associated with a four-main-fault model, consistent with recent paleoseismological studies and the present-day stress field, Mmax is estimated at Mw 6.8. Based on this scenario, there would be a 99 % probability that Mmax is less than 7.6.\n","PeriodicalId":508073,"journal":{"name":"Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences","volume":"4 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-163-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. The Upper Rhine Graben (URG), located in France and Germany, is bordered by north–south-trending faults, some of which are considered active, posing a potential threat to the dense population and infrastructures on the Alsace plain. The largest historical earthquake in the region was the M6.5±0.5 Basel earthquake in 1356. Current seismicity (M>2.5 since 1960) is mostly diffuse and located within the graben. We build upon previous seismic hazard studies of the URG by exploring uncertainties in greater detail and revisiting a number of assumptions. We first take into account the limited evidence of neotectonic activity and then explore tectonic scenarios that have not been taken into account previously, exploring uncertainties for Mmax, its recurrence time, the b value, and the moment released aseismically or through aftershocks. Uncertainties in faults' moment deficit rates, on the observed seismic events' magnitude–frequency distribution and on the moment–area scaling law of earthquakes, are also explored. Assuming a purely dip-slip normal faulting mechanism associated with a simplified model with three main faults, Mmax maximum probability is estimated at Mw 6.1. Considering this scenario, there would be a 99 % probability that Mmax is less than 7.3. In contrast, with a strike-slip assumption associated with a four-main-fault model, consistent with recent paleoseismological studies and the present-day stress field, Mmax is estimated at Mw 6.8. Based on this scenario, there would be a 99 % probability that Mmax is less than 7.6.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
莱茵河上游地堑南部地区潜在地震活动的最新情况
摘要莱茵河上游地堑(URG)位于法国和德国境内,毗邻南北走向的断层,其中一些被认为是活动断层,对阿尔萨斯平原上密集的人口和基础设施构成潜在威胁。该地区历史上最大的地震是 1356 年发生的 M6.5±0.5 级巴塞尔地震。目前的地震活动(1960 年以来 M>2.5 级)主要位于地堑内,且多为弥漫性地震。我们在之前对 URG 进行的地震危险性研究的基础上,更详细地探讨了不确定性,并重新审视了一些假设。我们首先考虑了新构造活动的有限证据,然后探讨了以前未曾考虑过的构造情况,探讨了最大震级、其重现时间、b 值以及地震或余震释放的力矩的不确定性。此外,还探讨了断层力矩亏损率的不确定性、观测到的地震事件的震级-频率分布以及地震的力矩-面积缩放规律。假设纯粹的倾滑正断层机制与三个主要断层的简化模型相关联,Mmax 最大概率估计为 Mw 6.1。在这种情况下,Mmax 小于 7.3 的概率为 99%。与此相反,根据与近期古地震学研究和当今应力场相一致的四主干断层模型相关的走向滑动假设,Mmax 估计为 Mw 6.8。根据这一假设,Mmax 小于 7.6 的可能性为 99%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flood occurrence and impact models for socioeconomic applications over Canada and the United States Harmonizing seismicity information in Central Asian countries: earthquake catalogue and active faults Model-based assessment of climate change impact on inland flood risk at the German North Sea coast caused by compounding storm tide and precipitation events Modelling crop hail damage footprints with single-polarization radar: the roles of spatial resolution, hail intensity, and cropland density A glacial lake outburst flood risk assessment for the Phochhu river basin, Bhutan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1