Holding Back: The Impact of Motivation to Control Prejudice on Stereotypes About Immigrants

Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI:10.33134/njmr.541
Audun Fladmoe, Julia Orupabo, J. Brekke, Ferdinand Mohn
{"title":"Holding Back: The Impact of Motivation to Control Prejudice on Stereotypes About Immigrants","authors":"Audun Fladmoe, Julia Orupabo, J. Brekke, Ferdinand Mohn","doi":"10.33134/njmr.541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A central insight from the research building on the Stereotype Content Model (SMC) is that different groups elicit different emotional and threat reactions. To advance our knowledge about which groups are likely to share experiences of discrimination and prejudice, we must explore the content of the stereotypes connected to different immigrant groups. Building on population representative survey data, the study applies a split-sample experimental design to test the SCM in Norway, an egalitarian welfare state characterized by low-income inequality. The results confirm the relevance of the SCM model in an egalitarian welfare setting, displaying an ethnic hierarchy expressed through social stereotypes. The results further indicate that ambivalent stereotypes of immigrants are limited in the Norwegian context. Finally, this study extends the SCM model by examining how respondents’ motivation to control prejudice (MCP) moderate stereotype judgement and finds that respondents with a high MCP rated the groups that are stereotyped as cold and incompetent more positively than individuals with a low MCP. Thus, individual propensity to hold back on prejudices influences expressions of stereotype content.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A central insight from the research building on the Stereotype Content Model (SMC) is that different groups elicit different emotional and threat reactions. To advance our knowledge about which groups are likely to share experiences of discrimination and prejudice, we must explore the content of the stereotypes connected to different immigrant groups. Building on population representative survey data, the study applies a split-sample experimental design to test the SCM in Norway, an egalitarian welfare state characterized by low-income inequality. The results confirm the relevance of the SCM model in an egalitarian welfare setting, displaying an ethnic hierarchy expressed through social stereotypes. The results further indicate that ambivalent stereotypes of immigrants are limited in the Norwegian context. Finally, this study extends the SCM model by examining how respondents’ motivation to control prejudice (MCP) moderate stereotype judgement and finds that respondents with a high MCP rated the groups that are stereotyped as cold and incompetent more positively than individuals with a low MCP. Thus, individual propensity to hold back on prejudices influences expressions of stereotype content.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
退缩:控制偏见的动机对移民刻板印象的影响
建立在刻板印象内容模型(SMC)基础上的研究的一个核心观点是,不同的群体会引起不同的情绪和威胁反应。为了增进我们对哪些群体可能共同经历歧视和偏见的了解,我们必须探索与不同移民群体相关的刻板印象的内容。本研究以具有人口代表性的调查数据为基础,在挪威这个以低收入不平等为特征的平等主义福利国家,采用分离样本实验设计来检验 SCM。研究结果证实了单片机模型在平等主义福利环境中的相关性,显示了通过社会刻板印象表现出来的种族等级制度。研究结果进一步表明,在挪威,对移民的矛盾刻板印象是有限的。最后,本研究通过研究受访者控制偏见的动机(MCP)对刻板印象判断的调节作用,扩展了SCM模型,并发现MCP高的受访者对被刻板印象为冷漠和无能的群体的评价比MCP低的个人更积极。因此,个人抑制偏见的倾向会影响刻板印象内容的表达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1