Sanitation configurations in Lilongwe: Everyday experiences on and off the grid

Cecilia Alda-Vidal, Alison L Browne, M. Lawhon, Deljana Iossifova
{"title":"Sanitation configurations in Lilongwe: Everyday experiences on and off the grid","authors":"Cecilia Alda-Vidal, Alison L Browne, M. Lawhon, Deljana Iossifova","doi":"10.1177/00420980231217661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars have called for increased attention to the practices through which residents of southern cities create and use infrastructure. The failures and disruptions of many particular artefacts have meant that people often develop multiple ways to access water, electricity, or transportation, even if all of them have limitations. For sanitation, thinking through heterogeneous infrastructure configurations can help us to see connections between toilets, and the reasons for maintaining access to different types of toilets, given their different risks and benefits. In this paper, we focus on plots in Lilongwe with both indoor flush-toilets and backyard latrines, and the lived experiences of people as they navigate choices about the use of these toilets. The presence of on and off-grid toilets is rooted in colonial urban form, yet is perpetuated – and proliferates in new places – as residents face a number of constraints, including most recently recurrent water shortages due to droughts. We consider both how this configuration challenges official imaginaries of urban sanitation, and how it helps residents to address different risks and sanitation needs. Drawing on the experience of Lilongwe, we reflect on what can be learnt from this heterogeneous infrastructural configuration in terms of planning for more resilient water and sanitation services in Global South cities and beyond.","PeriodicalId":508536,"journal":{"name":"Urban Studies","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231217661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholars have called for increased attention to the practices through which residents of southern cities create and use infrastructure. The failures and disruptions of many particular artefacts have meant that people often develop multiple ways to access water, electricity, or transportation, even if all of them have limitations. For sanitation, thinking through heterogeneous infrastructure configurations can help us to see connections between toilets, and the reasons for maintaining access to different types of toilets, given their different risks and benefits. In this paper, we focus on plots in Lilongwe with both indoor flush-toilets and backyard latrines, and the lived experiences of people as they navigate choices about the use of these toilets. The presence of on and off-grid toilets is rooted in colonial urban form, yet is perpetuated – and proliferates in new places – as residents face a number of constraints, including most recently recurrent water shortages due to droughts. We consider both how this configuration challenges official imaginaries of urban sanitation, and how it helps residents to address different risks and sanitation needs. Drawing on the experience of Lilongwe, we reflect on what can be learnt from this heterogeneous infrastructural configuration in terms of planning for more resilient water and sanitation services in Global South cities and beyond.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利隆圭的卫生设施配置:网络内外的日常经验
学者们呼吁更多地关注南方城市居民创造和使用基础设施的实践。许多特定人工制品的失灵和破坏意味着人们往往会开发出多种获取水、电或交通的方式,即使所有这些方式都有局限性。就卫生设施而言,通过思考不同的基础设施配置,可以帮助我们了解厕所之间的联系,以及考虑到不同类型厕所的不同风险和益处,维持使用不同类型厕所的原因。在本文中,我们将重点关注利隆圭同时拥有室内冲水厕所和后院厕所的地块,以及人们在选择使用这些厕所时的生活经历。这种厕所的存在植根于殖民时期的城市形态,但由于居民面临一系列限制因素,包括最近干旱造成的经常性缺水,这种厕所得以延续,并在新的地方大量出现。我们既要考虑这种配置如何挑战官方对城市卫生设施的想象,也要考虑它如何帮助居民应对不同的风险和卫生需求。借鉴利隆圭的经验,我们思考了在规划全球南部城市及其他地区更具弹性的供水和卫生服务方面,可以从这种异质性的基础设施配置中学到什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Invisible fish: The selective (dis)connection of elite Chinese gated community residents from urban public space Examining collaborative planning processes and outcomes in urban regeneration: A deliberative turn in China? Book review: The Routledge Handbook of Urban Design Research Methods StadtTeilen Book review: Urban Design Governance: Soft Powers and the European Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1