Neoauthoritarianism as a Challenge to Global Security

N. Khoma, M. Nikolayeva
{"title":"Neoauthoritarianism as a Challenge to Global Security","authors":"N. Khoma, M. Nikolayeva","doi":"10.14746/ps.2023.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study is to determine the features of neoauthoritarianism as a political regime, its tools, and consequences for global security. It is reasoned that neoauthoritarianism is an undemocratic system of methods and means of exercising centralized state power, which is characterized by the formalisation of democratic principles, institutions and procedures, and the use of digitalization to realize the goals of the regime. The features and tools of neoauthoritarianism are systematized, and the probable consequences of neoauthoritarianism on a global scale are assessed. The following features of neoauthoritarian regimes are determined: reduction of the role of ideology; integration into the global capitalist economy; imitation of a democratic facade; covert forms of pressure and control, manipulation, propaganda; providing a legal basis for any undemocratic initiatives; using the advantages of democratization, globalization, digitalization to achieve the regime’s destructive goals, etc. The following tools of neoauthoritarian influence are determined: power tools, tools of influence within the scope of “soft power,” tools of subversion, tools for changing values, electoral tools, tools of pressure on international organizations, etc. It is proven that due to neoauthoritarian intervention, the risks to global security are increased. The main consequence of ascending neoauthoritarianism on a global scale is the fact that neoauthoritarian regimes have endangered democracy as the dominant global model, reshaping the global security architecture.","PeriodicalId":247418,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Strategiczny","volume":"24 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Strategiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2023.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to determine the features of neoauthoritarianism as a political regime, its tools, and consequences for global security. It is reasoned that neoauthoritarianism is an undemocratic system of methods and means of exercising centralized state power, which is characterized by the formalisation of democratic principles, institutions and procedures, and the use of digitalization to realize the goals of the regime. The features and tools of neoauthoritarianism are systematized, and the probable consequences of neoauthoritarianism on a global scale are assessed. The following features of neoauthoritarian regimes are determined: reduction of the role of ideology; integration into the global capitalist economy; imitation of a democratic facade; covert forms of pressure and control, manipulation, propaganda; providing a legal basis for any undemocratic initiatives; using the advantages of democratization, globalization, digitalization to achieve the regime’s destructive goals, etc. The following tools of neoauthoritarian influence are determined: power tools, tools of influence within the scope of “soft power,” tools of subversion, tools for changing values, electoral tools, tools of pressure on international organizations, etc. It is proven that due to neoauthoritarian intervention, the risks to global security are increased. The main consequence of ascending neoauthoritarianism on a global scale is the fact that neoauthoritarian regimes have endangered democracy as the dominant global model, reshaping the global security architecture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新独裁主义对全球安全的挑战
本研究的目的是确定新权威主义作为一种政治制度的特点、其工具以及对全球安全的影响。研究认为,新权威主义是一种行使中央集权的方法和手段的非民主制度,其特点是将民主原则、制度和程序形式化,并利用数字化来实现该制度的目标。本文对新权威主义的特征和手段进行了系统化分析,并对新权威主义在全球范围内可能产生的后果进行了评估。确定了新权威主义政权的以下特征:降低意识形态的作用;融入全球资本主义经济;模仿民主的外表;暗中施压和控制、操纵、宣传;为任何不民主的举措提供法律依据;利用民主化、全球化、数字化的优势实现政权的破坏性目标等。新权威主义的影响工具包括:权力工具、"软权力 "范围内的影响工具、颠覆工具、改变价值观的工具、选举工具、向国际组织施压的工具等。事实证明,由于新权威主义的干预,全球安全的风险增加了。新威权主义在全球范围内上升的主要后果是,新威权主义政权危及了作为全球主导模式的民主,重塑了全球安全架构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Iran’s Attempted Denuclearization and the Legality of Nuclear Weapons Use Under International Law The Problem of Migration from Sub-Saharan Africa to Algeria in the Twenty-First Century Unification of Ukrainian Society in a Postwar Period as a Preventive Mechanism to Avert the Crisis of State How the Information Warfare Turns Into Full-Scale Military Agression: the Experience of Ukraine Analysis of Potential Threats to the Critical Infrastructure of the 31st Tactical Air Base, in the Context of the Security of the Poznan Agglomeration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1