Evaluation of PHARM-HF, a pharmacist-led heart failure medication titration clinic: A pre-post study

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP Pub Date : 2024-01-21 DOI:10.1002/jac5.1920
Simroop Ladhar B.Sc, Nathaniel M. Hawkins MBChB, M.D., MPH, Sean A. Virani M.D., M.Sc., MPH, Ricky D. Turgeon Pharm.D.
{"title":"Evaluation of PHARM-HF, a pharmacist-led heart failure medication titration clinic: A pre-post study","authors":"Simroop Ladhar B.Sc,&nbsp;Nathaniel M. Hawkins MBChB, M.D., MPH,&nbsp;Sean A. Virani M.D., M.Sc., MPH,&nbsp;Ricky D. Turgeon Pharm.D.","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The PHARM-HF clinic is a novel, pharmacist-led medication optimization clinic for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). PHARM-HF aims to achieve maximum-tolerated HFrEF guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) as outlined by the latest Canadian Cardiovascular Society heart failure guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective pre-post study evaluated consecutive patients attending PHARM-HF (January 2021–August 2022). The primary outcome was the modified Optimal Medication Therapy (mOMT) score, an aggregate score of HFrEF quadruple therapy. The mOMT score was categorized as suboptimal (score 0–4), acceptable (score 5–7), or optimal (score 8; all four drugs at maximum tolerated dose). Secondary outcomes included change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from baseline to 1 year, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 (KCCQ; range 0 [worst] to 100 [best]) from baseline to discharge.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 81 included patients, median age was 68 years, 21% were female, 61% had New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2 functional capacity, and median LVEF was 30%. Median mOMT improved from 6 (interquartile range [IQR] 4–7) at baseline to 8 (IQR 7–8) at clinic discharge (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; increase from 7% to 73% categorized as optimal). LVEF improved from a median of 30% to 38% at 1 year (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Among 16 patients who completed the KCCQ-12 at both time points, the score was 62 at baseline and 77 at discharge (<i>p</i> = 0.42).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Uptake of GDMT significantly increased from admission to discharge from the PHARM-HF medication optimization clinic, during which other cardiovascular clinicians did not modify HFrEF medications. Furthermore, there was an improvement in LVEF at 1 year. A pilot randomized controlled trial is currently underway to guide the development of a multicenter trial to provide definitive evidence for the role of pharmacist-led medication optimization in HFrEF.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jac5.1920","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jac5.1920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The PHARM-HF clinic is a novel, pharmacist-led medication optimization clinic for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). PHARM-HF aims to achieve maximum-tolerated HFrEF guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) as outlined by the latest Canadian Cardiovascular Society heart failure guidelines.

Methods

This retrospective pre-post study evaluated consecutive patients attending PHARM-HF (January 2021–August 2022). The primary outcome was the modified Optimal Medication Therapy (mOMT) score, an aggregate score of HFrEF quadruple therapy. The mOMT score was categorized as suboptimal (score 0–4), acceptable (score 5–7), or optimal (score 8; all four drugs at maximum tolerated dose). Secondary outcomes included change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from baseline to 1 year, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 (KCCQ; range 0 [worst] to 100 [best]) from baseline to discharge.

Results

Of 81 included patients, median age was 68 years, 21% were female, 61% had New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2 functional capacity, and median LVEF was 30%. Median mOMT improved from 6 (interquartile range [IQR] 4–7) at baseline to 8 (IQR 7–8) at clinic discharge (p < 0.001; increase from 7% to 73% categorized as optimal). LVEF improved from a median of 30% to 38% at 1 year (p < 0.001). Among 16 patients who completed the KCCQ-12 at both time points, the score was 62 at baseline and 77 at discharge (p = 0.42).

Conclusions

Uptake of GDMT significantly increased from admission to discharge from the PHARM-HF medication optimization clinic, during which other cardiovascular clinicians did not modify HFrEF medications. Furthermore, there was an improvement in LVEF at 1 year. A pilot randomized controlled trial is currently underway to guide the development of a multicenter trial to provide definitive evidence for the role of pharmacist-led medication optimization in HFrEF.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PHARM-HF 是一家由药剂师主导的心力衰竭药物滴定诊所:前后对比研究
PHARM-HF 诊所是由药剂师主导的新型药物优化诊所,主要针对射血分数降低型心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者。PHARM-HF旨在实现加拿大心血管协会最新心衰指南中规定的最大耐受HFrEF指导性药物治疗(GDMT)。这项回顾性事前事中研究对参加PHARM-HF(2021年1月至2022年8月)的连续患者进行了评估。主要结果是改良最佳药物治疗(mOMT)评分,这是高频心力衰竭四联疗法的综合评分。mOMT 评分分为次优(0-4 分)、可接受(5-7 分)或最优(8 分;所有四种药物均达到最大耐受剂量)。次要结果包括左心室射血分数(LVEF)从基线到1年的变化,以及堪萨斯城心肌病问卷调查-12(KCCQ;范围从0[最差]到100[最佳])从基线到出院的变化。在纳入的81名患者中,中位年龄为68岁,21%为女性,61%为纽约心脏协会(NYHA)2级功能,中位LVEF为30%。mOMT 中位数从基线时的 6(四分位间距 [IQR] 4-7)提高到出院时的 8(四分位间距 [IQR] 7-8)(p < 0.001;最佳分类从 7% 提高到 73%)。LVEF 从中位数 30% 提高到 1 年时 38%(P < 0.001)。在两个时间点均完成 KCCQ-12 测评的 16 名患者中,基线得分为 62 分,出院时得分为 77 分(p = 0.42)。从 PHARM-HF 药物优化门诊入院到出院,GDMT 的使用率显著增加,而在此期间,其他心血管临床医生并未对 HFrEF 药物进行调整。此外,1 年后 LVEF 有所改善。目前正在进行一项试点随机对照试验,以指导开展一项多中心试验,为药剂师指导的药物优化在 HFrEF 中的作用提供确凿证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A tale of two bills: Lessons learned in expanding pharmacist-led HIV pre-exposure and post-exposure prophylaxis Serving as a professional association board member: Benefits to leaders and their employers Unique model for pharmacist cross-coverage in the ambulatory care setting Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1